General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsour stupid media keeps reporting that Obama made a deal with iran
CHINA, RUSSIA, UNITED KINGDOM, FRANCE, GERMANY and Obama made a deal with iran
MADem
(135,425 posts)They came to us--not the other way around.
About time/good thing. The world is safer today than it was yesterday.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Stupid media is reporting it differently because "blaming Obama because...reasons" is all they got.
And associating China and Russia with peace is against the narrative.
MADem
(135,425 posts)that to happen. We got our accommodation, and a new day is dawning.
Now we can hit that reset button, and begin anew.
Response to MADem (Reply #1)
Post removed
yurbud
(39,405 posts)the same way every other country does: defensively.
The "threat" of their nuke program was that it would make it harder for neocons and/or Israel to conduct airstrikes, invade, or bully Iran.
It makes us safer in the sense that frustrating those warmongers means a conflict that would escalate to World War III is less likely to happen.
But they are still trying in the Ukraine.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Iran doesn't need nuclear weapons, at least those of their own manufacture.
And they've got neighbors who have them, who might be more than willing to make a deal, for the right price if it ever came to that--there's a bear-riding, dolphin-kissing fool up that way, just over the Caspian, who isn't feeling a lot of love lately. His predecessor's operatives were all over Iran back in the seventies. I'm sure there are plenty still there, stirring up shit.
That said, odds are, since the ulema have realized that their ham-handed, asinine tactics are not resonating with the next generation, that they are starting to recognize that they had a better game going on when they were friendly with us, and the side benefit to Iran is that rapprochement with USA will accompany a small amount of liberalization within Persian society--not just for the wealthy up Tajrish way (who have always gotten away with everything short of murder), but for the rank and file in the middle of the city.
The children of Iran are the future, and they just don't want to put up with all that fundy shit. They observe the hypocrisy, and they TIRE of it:
With the same dress code you will be arrested by the morality police but not in pro-regime demonstrations. Under the existing laws of the Islamic Republic, just last year 3.6 million Iranian women were warned by the police just because they were not wearing following the proper Islamic dress code. Under the laws of the Islamic Republic, just last year more than 18,000 women ended up in court for being badly veiled.
http://mystealthyfreedom.net/en/
yurbud
(39,405 posts)the region than Russia or even Iran.
MADem
(135,425 posts)When I was living further south, they weren't well meaning, either.
The Russians made a mess in Bushehr--they're like the gang that couldn't shoot (or build) straight. And they've taken more land from Iran throughout history than anyone else at that table ever did--so the idea that they're 'good buddies' with Iran is a bit fraught by historical reality. Iran has dealt with them because they've had to--not because they necessarily wanted to. IMO, anyway...!
Here is an article that might explain some of my views on this subject:
http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2015/07/09/big-loser-in-any-nuclear-deal-with-iran-may-be-russia/
still_one
(92,190 posts)ignoring the fact that it will be up to the congressional Democrats, NOT the republicans if the U.S. accepts this deal.
Of course, as you pointed out, even if the U.S. didn't approve the deal, the other countries party to this deal will go it alone.
The idiots in congress against this deal, most likely have no alternative, and so effectively what they are proposing is doing nothing, which means Iran would continue enrichment. Is their proposal to invade Iran?
spanone
(135,832 posts)he already opposes it.
still_one
(92,190 posts)override, they are powerless.
Yeah, and most of these idiots are doing just that: Defending the Repukes.
Iggo
(47,552 posts)Of course they'd rather invade.
kairos12
(12,861 posts)lark
(23,099 posts)Yes, it is their proposal and steadfast belief that we should go to war with Iran. After all, that's what the little murderer in charge in Israel has demanded and we MUST comply! Boner is little murderers #1 fan and Mcturtle not far behind.
malaise
(268,999 posts)only America counts - you know exceptional and all that. The others better behave or else.
still_one
(92,190 posts)spanone
(135,832 posts)Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)France 24: 'Netanyahu threatens openly to take fight against Iran Nuclear Deal to American political arena - will use influence with US right-wing to try to scupper it.'
karynnj
(59,503 posts)I am surprised that he didn't learn from earlier in the year, when his actions actually moved the Democrats, who were moving to support sanctions, to the President's side.
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)at NOTHING to keep his 'base' riled up and his American RW enablers in line.
What he does revolts me, but doesn't shock me.
karynnj
(59,503 posts)Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)were made 'behind closed doors'.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)Damn megalomaniac have the equivalent of two tankers filled with blood on his hands.
xocet
(3,871 posts)oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)Yes! When I have lived in other countries the papers report that country and others doing something. Here, me me me. Only matters if you can say U.S.A did something. sigh.
Romeo.lima333
(1,127 posts)dvduval
(260 posts)He dictates to the Republicans which treaties he will making, unlike Bush who dictated which countries he would be invading (with false evidence).
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)And Russia,....and China....
thesquanderer
(11,986 posts)Saying Obama made the deal could sound like blame... or it could sound like credit. Depends on the source, and the listener...
spanone
(135,832 posts)i don't think 'OBAMACARE' was born out of giving him credit either....it was republican slander that the media immediately adopted
thesquanderer
(11,986 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)had Iran not said "Yes, it is time. These sanctions are crippling us; we need medicine, we need help getting our oil and gas fields up to snuff, we need these sanctions to end. Our lives were better when we were part of the world, not railing against it."
Life is going to get much better in Iran. The children of Iran, the ones who never knew the Shah, who never understood that period of time, who never knew life under anything but a religous--as opposed to monarchial--dictatorship, can look forward to a brighter day.
Obama's leadership made this happen, but it would not have happened unless Iran agreed to begin anew with all of those countries sitting at that table.
I'm happy as hell--this could be the start of some good things.
Jakes Progress
(11,122 posts)rladdi
(581 posts)They chase and report anything they can make news on. IE Donald Trump