General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsStone Mt's Dem, AA Congressman has no problem with the carving remaining.
with all the shouting I'm seeing here about it today, that may as well be factored into the discussion.
http://atlanta.cbslocal.com/2015/07/13/atlanta-naacp-says-they-can-sand-blast-lee-jefferson-and-jackson-off-of-stone-mountain/
http://politics.blog.ajc.com/2015/07/14/sandblasting-the-confederate-faces-off-stone-mountain-yeah-right/
Should we blast those images off Stone Mountain? How far do we go? Stone Mountain is a Confederate area, heritage area, I guess you would call it. And but it is a public park that all of us go to, and I guess we have to all keep it in perspective.
I view Stone Mountain as more of a museum-type archaeological place of remembrance for those who want to remember back then and they have a right to remember back then and the park is there."
So I think the park is not the same as the state capitol or an office building where official business is being taken care of. Stone Mountain is like a park, and sure its a Confederate park, and so I respect it being there.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Is the same, to me, as burning books we don't like, or AG John Ashcroft putting drapes over statues of
Naked justice.
It is wrong.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Place something akin to this...
adjacent to the original carving and it would allow additional art and additional context.
Warpy
(111,261 posts)and quite another to destroy a monument. Doing the latter is what the Taliban and ISIS have done to their heritage sites that don't conform to their interpretation of how things ought to be.
The former is correcting a current and ongoing insult. The latter is revisionism, trying to destroy a historical record in an attempt to make it more palatable. I'm perfectly happy to have old Confederate monuments stand, they record the past even for those of us who don't afford it much honor.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)The real Confederate flag.