Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 08:37 AM Jul 2015

Movement to restore PLUTO's planetary status: Time to start one.

Looks like a planet to me, dammit! How much more 'planety' can you get?

PLUTO - PLUTO - PLUTO - PLANET - PLANET - PLANET








Just because it's out there all alone at the edge of the solar system, doesn't make it a "solar pariah".

If MERCURY can be a planet, so can PLUTO!!!

So say I!

48 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Movement to restore PLUTO's planetary status: Time to start one. (Original Post) Surya Gayatri Jul 2015 OP
. Wilms Jul 2015 #1
Good one! What would Walt do? He'd buy Pluto! LOL! Surya Gayatri Jul 2015 #9
It can look very planety, especially if the artist wants it to muriel_volestrangler Jul 2015 #2
Who knew? Google came up with the 1st pic for 'Pluto'. Hard to tell them apart at that distance! Surya Gayatri Jul 2015 #5
Pluto is a Kuiper Belt Object muriel_volestrangler Jul 2015 #10
So, they may correctly be referred to as 'second league' or 'pee-wee' planets? Surya Gayatri Jul 2015 #12
Pluto is a Kuiper Belt Object AlbertCat Jul 2015 #36
"It looks like a planet" isn't a reason tkmorris Jul 2015 #3
Existential question... Surya Gayatri Jul 2015 #6
. GreatGazoo Jul 2015 #4
Saw that before! LOL! Surya Gayatri Jul 2015 #7
Is 36,373 mph "real slow?" AlbertCat Jul 2015 #37
Cute! I never dumped Pluto.. did not agree it wasn't one of the Planets in our Solar System. Cha Jul 2015 #40
I don't know, it looks a little scary gollygee Jul 2015 #8
This message was self-deleted by its author MineralMan Jul 2015 #11
The Spock Test Bad Thoughts Jul 2015 #13
That's the issue. It is definitely not "out there all alone" longship Jul 2015 #14
Third choice--classes of planets: Terrestrial, Gaseous, Icy. eom. Bad Thoughts Jul 2015 #15
Well, that's true. And we already do that. longship Jul 2015 #17
The choice to demote Pluto had more to do with having a Pantheon Bad Thoughts Jul 2015 #18
Your second claim seems dubious. longship Jul 2015 #22
New Horizons funded when Pluto was a planet Bad Thoughts Jul 2015 #23
All planetary science funding (which includes KBOs and dwarf planets) is tough. longship Jul 2015 #25
Fair enough. eom. Bad Thoughts Jul 2015 #26
Not literally 'all alone', but imagine how lonely it must feel, having been Surya Gayatri Jul 2015 #19
I have to admit I'm on team Neil DeGrasse tyson gollygee Jul 2015 #20
There we have it. backscatter712 Jul 2015 #35
There's already a petition for this on change.org... Princess Turandot Jul 2015 #16
Dr. Stern sounds like a man after my own heart! Surya Gayatri Jul 2015 #21
If Science were rooted in the number of people who signed a petition, Volaris Jul 2015 #30
I'm on Team Stern, too! mahalo PT Cha Jul 2015 #41
Suck it, Neal Degrasse Tyson. nt Tommy_Carcetti Jul 2015 #24
You think THAT's a planet? DetlefK Jul 2015 #27
Forever relegated to the second league? What a come down for a once Surya Gayatri Jul 2015 #28
Other moons don't count. Orrex Jul 2015 #31
And Ceres! Make Ceres a planet too! nt Adrahil Jul 2015 #29
Ceres is our largest beautiful asteroid! Cha Jul 2015 #42
How about we let the scientists figure it out? HuckleB Jul 2015 #32
I guess some folks don't like scientists figuring shit out. longship Jul 2015 #38
Not a planet. Sorry... Not a planet. Glassunion Jul 2015 #33
this movement is kinda Goofy olddots Jul 2015 #34
Plutoids -- look it up. LiberalAndProud Jul 2015 #39
Pro Pluto here.. raises hand. Cha Jul 2015 #43
I agree madokie Jul 2015 #44
Hey there, good buddy. Pluto's had a bum rap for too long! LOL! Surya Gayatri Jul 2015 #46
Thank you, madokie Jul 2015 #47
Now is the time to revisit our plan to bomb the moon. Orrex Jul 2015 #45
This message was self-deleted by its author FreedomRain Jul 2015 #48

muriel_volestrangler

(101,321 posts)
2. It can look very planety, especially if the artist wants it to
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 08:55 AM
Jul 2015

like your 3rd image:
http://www.sci-news.com/space/science-new-horizons-polar-cap-pluto-02749.html

Your 1st image is not of Pluto, but of Eris (called, at first, 'Xena') - are you campaigning for that too?

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/hst_xena_20060410.html
http://www.universetoday.com/13573/why-pluto-is-no-longer-a-planet/


Pluto is smaller than our Moon. What makes it look more planety than the Moon?

Ironically, it was the discovery of Eris that got people thinking "maybe we've got loads of these out there, and this one's more massive than Pluto - do we want to call them all planets?"

Pluto's orbit crosses Neptune's, and is locked into a resonance with it because of Neptune's far larger gravity - for every 3 times Neptune goes round the Sun, Pluto goes round twice.

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
5. Who knew? Google came up with the 1st pic for 'Pluto'. Hard to tell them apart at that distance!
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 09:04 AM
Jul 2015

If Eris is a candidate, why not?

If it's not a moon, not a comet, not an asteroid, then what is it? A "planetary entity", a "solar left-over"?

muriel_volestrangler

(101,321 posts)
10. Pluto is a Kuiper Belt Object
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 09:20 AM
Jul 2015

along with over 1,000 other bodies: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuiper_belt

Eris is technically a Scattered-Disk Object (it goes even further out from the Sun than Pluto does).

They are both dwarf planets.

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
12. So, they may correctly be referred to as 'second league' or 'pee-wee' planets?
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 09:30 AM
Jul 2015

Not big enough for the premier league - sorry fellas.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
36. Pluto is a Kuiper Belt Object
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 02:44 PM
Jul 2015

Indeed.


Pluto went from being a the smallest planet...


to the largest Kuiper Belt object.

That's not a demotion!

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
6. Existential question...
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 09:06 AM
Jul 2015
'If it's not a moon, not a comet, not an asteroid, then what is it? A "planetary entity", a "solar left-over"?'

Response to Surya Gayatri (Original post)

Bad Thoughts

(2,524 posts)
13. The Spock Test
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 09:38 AM
Jul 2015

I think that Allen Stern, one of the lead astronomers on New Horizon, is right: the status of an object should be judged from its innate qualities. The Enterprise needs to go into orbit, look at it, and judge what it is. Spock should not go about arduously calculating all the orbits of all the objects in the solar system to see if this one objects "clears its orbits."

longship

(40,416 posts)
14. That's the issue. It is definitely not "out there all alone"
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 09:40 AM
Jul 2015

So the IAU had a choice.

1. Eight planets.

2. Twelve planets with likely uncountable more to come.

Also, the IAU did not define the word planet as much as they made it a concept.

Anyway, Pluto is definitely different from all the planets, both in character and in behavior. Now it is true that the eight planets have different characteristics. That is why Pluto not being a "planet" is because of its behavior.

"Pluto. Get over it." (Neil deGrasse Tyson)

longship

(40,416 posts)
17. Well, that's true. And we already do that.
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 09:52 AM
Jul 2015

We have terrestrial: MVEM
Gas giants: JS
Ice giants: UN
Dwarf planets: quite a few, including Pluto, which is apparently the largest of them.

Pluto is also classified as a Kuiper Belt Object.

But your point is well taken. But remember, Pluto's status is not about its appearance or its make up, but about its behavior.

My regards.

Bad Thoughts

(2,524 posts)
18. The choice to demote Pluto had more to do with having a Pantheon
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 09:57 AM
Jul 2015

They members of the association wanted to keep the number of planets limited, and found qualities (not belonging to dwarf planets themselves) that allowed them to do so.

Three problems. First, the solar system is much messier, much more complex than eight planets and some minor objects. Second, it's going to get harder to convince the public to fund research on "Kuiper belt objects" or "scattered disc objects" than it would be for planetary research. Third, getting less money for research on these areas means that they will deny themselves the resources to look at the current frontier in planetary research.

longship

(40,416 posts)
22. Your second claim seems dubious.
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 10:02 AM
Jul 2015

Especially given both the currently active New Horizons and Dawn probes, which neatly and simply falsifies your claim.

Bad Thoughts

(2,524 posts)
23. New Horizons funded when Pluto was a planet
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 10:06 AM
Jul 2015

And the funding for Ceres and Pluto probes were cancelled many times, their budgets slashed.

longship

(40,416 posts)
25. All planetary science funding (which includes KBOs and dwarf planets) is tough.
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 10:13 AM
Jul 2015

The funding issue has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the classification of the objects. It is about the fact that cutting edge science is difficult to do and thus expensive. Your claim is just not credible.

A counter example. The James Webb Space Telescope, also under funding stress.
Sorry.

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
19. Not literally 'all alone', but imagine how lonely it must feel, having been
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 09:59 AM
Jul 2015

ignominiously demoted to 'object' status, after so many years in the big league?

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
20. I have to admit I'm on team Neil DeGrasse tyson
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 10:00 AM
Jul 2015

I don't think it should be considered a planet either. It seems like the only excuse to do so is nostalgia over the days it was a planet, and that's an incredibly weak scientific argument.

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
35. There we have it.
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 01:29 PM
Jul 2015

If Pluto becomes an Official Planet again, we'd have to do the same for Eris, Haumea, Makemake, Ceres, Sedna, Orcus, Quaoar, Varuna, etc....

Princess Turandot

(4,787 posts)
16. There's already a petition for this on change.org...
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 09:44 AM
Jul 2015

addressed to the International Astronomical Union.

Dr. Stern calls it a planet and since he actually went and took a look at it, that's good enough for me.

https://www.change.org/p/international-astronomical-union-declare-pluto-a-planet-plutoflyby

Volaris

(10,272 posts)
30. If Science were rooted in the number of people who signed a petition,
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 10:42 AM
Jul 2015

The Earth would still be flat and Gravity would be subject to Trickle-down economics.
Pluto's not a planet.
Get over it.
=)

DetlefK

(16,423 posts)
27. You think THAT's a planet?
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 10:33 AM
Jul 2015

some diameters:

Ceres 963 km
Pluto 2370 km
Luna 3476 km
Callisto 4821 km
Io 3643 km
Europa 3122 km
Ganymede 5262 km

Mercury 4879 km
Venus 12,103 km
Terra 12,756 km
Mars 6792 km

Now, which of those are planets and which are moons?

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
28. Forever relegated to the second league? What a come down for a once
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 10:37 AM
Jul 2015

proud, proper planet. Always to be referred to as a "pee-wee" or dwarf?

Oh, the ignominy!

Orrex

(63,215 posts)
31. Other moons don't count.
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 11:29 AM
Jul 2015

That eliminates Luna, Callisto, Io, Europa and Ganymede (and Titan as well, though it wasn't on the list).

That means that of all the known objects in the solar system, Pluto is among the largest whose primary orbit is around the sun rather than the host planet.

longship

(40,416 posts)
38. I guess some folks don't like scientists figuring shit out.
Wed Jul 15, 2015, 03:25 PM
Jul 2015

Amazingly, those same folks manage to get online using the fruits of that same shit.

I have to shrug, too.




Also, there's no law that says Pluto is not a planet. This is just for how science sees things. (Some scientists disagree, as usual.)

My best to you.

madokie

(51,076 posts)
44. I agree
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:26 AM
Jul 2015


ETA: it is so awesome that we can build and send a space craft that is over 9 years in the journey in order to get these photos. I forgot how long it takes for the signals to travel from here to there. Those signals are traveling at the speed of light so that little bugger is a long ways away.

Planet Pluto indeed. it will always be to me as I lived most of my life knowing it was anyway.
 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
46. Hey there, good buddy. Pluto's had a bum rap for too long! LOL!
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:31 AM
Jul 2015

Seriously, I don't care what they call it--it's still cool.

Have you seen this?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026979204

'Historic image of Pluto, with 10 times the resolution of anything ever seen before...'

madokie

(51,076 posts)
47. Thank you,
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:41 AM
Jul 2015

I have now seen this. To me this is the crown jewel of what we as humans can do. This space craft has been over 9 years in getting there. What an achievement that is let alone send back these awesome pictures.

Response to Surya Gayatri (Original post)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Movement to restore PLUTO...