General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMassive tax fraud by undocumented workers in Indiana
If it's happening to this extent in Indiana it must be nationwide...
20 kids = $30,000
WTHR spoke to several undocumented workers who confirmed it is easy.
They all agreed to talk with WTHR investigative reporter Bob Segall and a translator as long as WTHR agreed not to reveal their identity.
One of the workers, who was interviewed at his home in southern Indiana, admitted his address was used this year to file tax returns by four other undocumented workers who don't even live there. Those four workers claimed 20 children live inside the one residence and, as a result, the IRS sent the illegal immigrants tax refunds totaling $29,608.
13 Investigates saw only one little girl who lives at that address (a small mobile home). We wondered about the 20 kids claimed as tax deductions?
"They don't live here," said the undocumented worker. "The other kids are in their country of origin, which is Mexico."
He later explained none of the 20 children have ever visited the United States let alone lived here.
So why should undocumented workers receive tax credits for children living in a foreign country, which is a violation of IRS tax rules?
"If the opportunity is there and they can give it to me, why not take advantage of it?" the worker said.
Other undocumented workers in Indiana told 13 Investigates the same thing. Their families are collecting tax refunds for children who do not live in this country. Several of the workers told WTHR they were told it was legal for them to claim the tax credit for a child who does not live in the United States.
http://www.wthr.com/story/17798210/tax-loophole-costs-billions
sinkingfeeling
(51,474 posts)ret5hd
(20,522 posts)not stating a position on whether it SHOULD be legal but:
<snip from your link>
What does the IRS have to say about all this?
The agency sent WTHR a statement, defending its policy of paying tax credits to illegal immigrants.
"The law has been clear for over a decade that eligibility for these credits does not depend on work authorization status or the type of taxpayer identification number used. Any suggestion that the IRS shouldn't be paying out these credits under current law to ITIN holders is simply incorrect. The IRS administers the law impartially and applies it as it is written," the statement said.
</snip>
True Earthling
(832 posts)when they're actually in Mexico.
Vanje
(9,766 posts)or in a car, What will the parents claim as their residential address?
There are a lot of Mexican families with kids in school locally (Homedale / Wilder Idaho) who have no residential address.
Should'nt these children be counted as dependents on their parents taxes?
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)I see it the same way: perhaps it is technically legal, but it shouldn't be.
So fraud may not be the right term. But it is dishonest.
former9thward
(32,082 posts)And the other people claiming the deductions at that mobile home are fictional too.
dems_rightnow
(1,956 posts)Children who have never been to the US fail both of these tests to claim the credit:
Citizenship Test - To meet the citizenship test, the child must be a U.S. citizen, U.S. national, or U.S. resident alien.
Residence Test - The child must have lived with you for more than half of the year.
obnoxiousdrunk
(2,910 posts)SSN for the kids ??
sadbear
(4,340 posts)because I messed up my son's SSN by one digit. These people would need 20 legitimate SSN's to pull of this kind of fraud. Story smells fishy.
Pisces
(5,602 posts)you?? Your selective outrage on who should use the tax loopholes and who shouldn't says it all.
Look at Romney and his Cayman accounts. I am sure you can find millions of unpaid tax loopholes he has taken advantage
of.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)Consider: there are on the low estimate 10 million people living here illegally.
That means if they get 6 and a half bucks per from the tax system they are costing us the same as the fella from facebook.
It's easier to be outraged by the one guy who get's away with a lot, but that doesn't mean that a lot of people getting away with a little aren't also a problem.
True Earthling
(832 posts)from the article...
Claims for additional child tax credits by ITIN filers have skyrocketed during the past decade, from $161 million in 2001 to $4.2 billion in tax year 2010.
· Undocumented workers filed 3.02 million tax returns in 2010. 72% of those returns (2.18 million) claimed the additional child tax credit.
· In 2010, the IRS owed undocumented workers more in claimed additional child tax credits than it collected from those workers in taxes.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)we could certainly use that for other things.
True Earthling
(832 posts)and should be banned from re-entering the country. There are lot's of threads I didn't post on. What does that say about me?
zzaapp
(531 posts)GeorgeGist
(25,323 posts)This is so last week. Try to keep up.
jehop61
(1,735 posts)It was posted several weeks ago. I wonder just how someone could get a "REFUND" on his taxes on 20 children. Doesn't REFUND mean you already paid something and are getting it back because the government took too much? This story doesn't pass the smell test and the tv station that showed it is very very suspect. Do you believe everything you see on tv and on the "nets"?
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)So a "refund" doesn't always mean you paid too much.
The-Roof-Is-On-Fire
(6 posts)You were wondering how someone gets money back that they didn't pay in...read up on tax credits.
Education is empowerment.
trof
(54,256 posts)coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)the local supermarket to buy foie de gras and caviar?
channeling my inner Reagan.
This is such right wing, anti-worker horseshit.
True Earthling
(832 posts)I'm against fraud regardless of who commits it. What kind of society would it be to selectively prosecute crimes... look the other way for those we have sympathy for and prosecute those we dislike? The law should be applied equally to all.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)population 'deserves' to own\control 40% of its wealth and 10% to own\control 80% of its wealth.
Since we're talking 'deserves'.
Flame away
True Earthling
(832 posts)and take advantage of other taxpayers to even things out? The $4.2B that these workers received came from somewhere.... the taxes collected from other workers.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Citizens see crime commited by the leaders/owners of their country, why not they as well? It is shitty piss poor leaders that instead commit crimes that become the champions of those that might not have considered a life of crime in the first place.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)income from labor for most workers. So forgive me if I fail to lose much sleep over the rearranging of deck chairs on the U.S.S. Titanic.
Note we were talking about the question of who 'deserves' what, not the morality or lack thereof over obeying the laws of a highly suspect capitalist state where wealth and opportunity are highly concentrated and daily becoming more so. After Katrina and the smashing of Occupy by a federally coordinated attack nationwide, it should be obvious to all but the most somnolent that it's every person for him- or herself. The government has for the most part abandoned, and declared its enmity for, the working and middle class.
If you wish to keep whistling past the graveyard, more power to ya.
True Earthling
(832 posts)If it's every person for him/herself then it's anarchy. Is that what you're advocating?
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)of the population.
Is that what you're advocating?
True Earthling
(832 posts)I advocate the law equally applied to all but the law has to be fair as well. I don't advocate fraud and theft as a form of social justice.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)every great fortune lies a great crime."
Sometimes the social contract becomes so corrupt and rotted from the inside out that only a fresh start will fix matters. I believe we are living in such a time, reminiscent of France 1789 or Russia 1917.
Chan790
(20,176 posts)To revolt is a natural tendency of life. Even a worm turns against the foot that crushes it. In general, the vitality and relative dignity of an animal can be measured by the intensity of its instinct to revolt.
The liberty of man consists solely in this: that he obeys natural laws because he has himself recognized them as such, and not because they have been externally imposed upon him by any extrinsic will whatever, divine or human, collective or individual
Does it follow that I reject all authority? Perish the thought. In the matter of boots, I defer to the authority of the boot-maker.
-All quotes Mikhail Bakunin
Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)OP was kind enough to point that out to us once THC was found in Martin's blood. Ahem.
True Earthling
(832 posts)Please explain.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)too many chocolate chip cookies
While I long ago discontinued the pot use, my aggressive tendencies toward chocolate chip cookies (and all things chocolate, actually) remain unabated.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)that drive down wages for american laborers and make organizing all that more difficult = pro-worker?
With friends like this . . .
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)chauvinism are quite telling.
Care to explain how 'government subsidies for low wage earners' make organizing all that more difficult? Otherwise, spare me the right wing cant.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)The availability of 10+ million disposable low wage workers that can be held to lower safety/health standards than American workers harms the ability of American workers to demand better conditions.
You I assume believe that they are helping to drive up wages and improve labor conditions by . . . magic perhaps?
Race-baiting: never mentioned race.
national chavinism: well if you mean I think American tax dollars should primarily benefit Americans who are now suffering yes, I suppose so.
You believe our wealth should instead be used to the benefit of everyone else while American workers struggle to make ends meet?
And government subsidies to these people mean they can work for even lower wages. Meaning that at the mere hint of organizing those companies that still employ americans will gladly kick them all out for near slave workers.
Explain how adding a large number of easily exploited low wage workers improves the lot of the rest please.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)rid of every undocumented worker in the greater Los Angeles metropolitan area, the entire city would come to a screeching, grinding halt. Hint: it ain't the gringos who are mowing the lawns, changing the diapers and collecting the garbage here.
You're either for workers or you're not. Undocumented workers are workers first and citizens of some arbitrary nation-state second.
40% of the wealth of this country is controlled by 1% of the population. And 80% of the wealth of this country is controlled by 10% of the population. News flash: the 1% (or 10%) are not, generally speaking, undocumented workers.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)Anyone?
Bueller?
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)in right wing fascist fantasy land.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)Actually according to the law, there is.
You may be basing your definition of legal/illegal on something else (the Bible perhaps). But generally speaking it's based on the law.
And the law clearly defines who may and who may not work in the US for a wage.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)you know, forcing Americans to compete with low wage workers in a game that benefits owners and drives wages down.
You're cool with that right? You think anyone who argues against outsourcing is a racist no doubt.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)"outsourcing" , then labor should be free also to move freely across borders.
I think anyone who argues against outsourcing is failing to back the international working class. Sometimes that's racism, sometimes it's national chauvinism and sometimes (as in the case of MinuteMen), it's both.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)and you claim to also stand up for working Americans.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)you no doubt believe in a highminded way that you are working for international solidarity or whatever.
But in reality by promoting the use of wage lowering illegal labor you are only harming american workers to the benefit of the 1%.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)to move freely across borders, then labor should be allowed to move freely across borders too."
Do I have to spell it out for you any more clearly? if labor is not allowed to move freely across borders, then capital should not be allowed to move across borders either.
Screw you. I was a labor shop steward. All you do is spew. So screw you. I am a democratic socialist and an internationalist. YOU ARE A NATIONALIST AND A CRYPTO-FASCIST.
4th law of robotics
(6,801 posts)then call me a fascist.
Interesting.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)the wealth of the 1% and placing it under public control.
You, on the other hand, spout nationalistic tripe like 'American jobs for American workers' and expect not to get called on it.
Interesting indeed.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)EFerrari
(163,986 posts)Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Surprise, surprise.
Even if it's true to the exent the story would have you believe (and I highly doubt it is), pointing this out while failing to mention the 40% of bonafide US citizens who cheat on their taxes seems more than a little disingenuous.
EFerrari
(163,986 posts)So, are they telling the truth to the reporter or were they telling the truth to the IRS or what?
This story was just a clear attempt to rile nativist anti-immigrant feeling.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)So it's definitely making the rounds within wingnut circles. That alone is very telling, even before you realize it's ridiculously easy to debunk.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)If it ever reaches the extent of corporate fraud (e.g, KPMG defrauded the government for 11 billion dollars, businessman Water Anderson, or Deutsche Bank), I'll allow it consideration.
Until then, I can only presume that those focusing on the aberration of tax fraud by undocumented workers rather than the frauds that actually make a dent in our collective treasury are less interested in tax fraud, and more interested in finding irrelevant criticisms regarding undocumented workers.
And just a heads-up...
"If it's happening to this extent in Indiana it must be nationwide... " That is a logical fallacy known as Denying the Antecedent
True Earthling
(832 posts)Disapproving tax fraud by undocumented workers does not imply approval of tax fraud by the 1% or corporations.
Since the 1% and corporations don't pay their fair share of taxes then the $4B paid in credits to the undocumented workers came from honest working taxpayers. You're advocating theft and fraud as a form of social justice which is really harming the average law abiding taxpayer. The money taken out by fraud has to be made up from somewhere... additional gov't debt, job cuts, higher taxes etc. which we all pay for.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"You're advocating theft and fraud as a form of social justice ..."
Nope-- appears you're inferring sentiments simply that don't exist-- unless of course you can point to the relevant and specific implication which may only be interpreted as such.
I simply do not give due consideration to mice when a pack of lions appears. Crack open some research (e.g., Wenzel's The Impact of Outcome Orientation and Justice Concerns on Tax Compliance, Tax Havens: How Globalization Really Works by Ronen Palan, & Treasure Islands: Uncovering the Damage of Offshore Banking and Tax Havens by Nicholas Shaxson) to find out that the bulk of tax fraud and evasion (in dollar amounts) is by far due to the machinations of corporations.
I realize that may not validate your narrative, but until you at least cite sources (other than simply "unnamed sources" as per the OP article), you're blowing wind without an instrument...
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)It used to be laughably easy to get a driver's license there because they never used to double-check the addresses on the application...So a lot of undocumented immigrants used imaginary house numbers or dozens of people would use one 'real' address
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)and the article has a mistake.
it's not a "loophole" if you cheat the system out of illegally taken tax deductions and/or tax credits.
trof
(54,256 posts)Earlier this month, a reader sent me an email with a link to a news clip from Channel 13 (WHTR in Indianapolis) with the title 13 Investigates: IRS tax loophole. She wrote:
I was wondering if it was true
seems a little far-fetched to me.
checked it out and dismissed it as much ado about nothing.
But then I saw it on Twitter.
And I saw it on Facebook.
And I realized that the video had gone viral as taxpayer outrage mounted.
But folks are mad about the wrong thing.
This is not a loophole. Its tax fraud. Those are two totally different things. And Channel 13 knows it.
A loophole is an ambiguity. Theres nothing ambiguous about whats going on here: this kind of fraud simply isnt allowable under the Tax Code. The credit that the report refers to is the Additional Tax Credit and its claimed on a federal form 8812 (form downloads as a pdf). The credit is for certain taxpayers who get less than the full amount of the child tax credit it is not some kind of loophole for undocumented workers to use to beef up their refunds. The rules for qualifying children still apply and its very clear that the credit is restricted to those children who are classified as a U.S. citizen, a U.S. national, or a U.S. resident alien.
Nonresident aliens meaning those living abroad like those cited in the news piece dont qualify. And the scenarios that were noted in the piece? Those instances are used as the example of what doesnt count in the IRS Publication on child tax credits.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kellyphillipserb/2012/05/15/viral-tax-loophole-video-is-misleading-taxpayer-fraud-is-a-much-bigger-problem/
Vanje
(9,766 posts)These guys are taking all the money!
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)This has been the most important DU thread ever!