Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

former9thward

(32,023 posts)
Fri Aug 7, 2015, 08:50 PM Aug 2015

EPA Workers trigger 1 million gallons of pollution into river.

DURANGO — A spill that sent 1 million gallons of wastewater from an abandoned mine into the Animas River, turning the river orange, set off warnings Thursday that contaminants threaten water quality for those downstream.

The Environmental Protection Agency confirmed it triggered the spill while using heavy machinery to investigate pollutants at the Gold King Mine, north of Silverton.

Health and environmental officials are evaluating the river as it flows through San Juan and La Plata counties. They said the wastewater contained zinc, iron, copper and other heavy metals, prompting the EPA to warn agricultural users to shut off water intakes along the river and law officials to close the river to recreational users.

"There's nothing that can be done to stop the flow of the river," said Joe Lewandowski, a spokesman for Colorado Parks and Wildlife. "We can only wait until the flows slow down. We had a big heavy spring (of rain) here."



http://www.denverpost.com/environment/ci_28595759/animas-river-contaminated-by-1-million-gallons-contaminated

63 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
EPA Workers trigger 1 million gallons of pollution into river. (Original Post) former9thward Aug 2015 OP
The EPA will immediate initiate a lawsuit against itself Igel Aug 2015 #1
epa, Americas domestic worst enemy DustyJoe Aug 2015 #2
Take your anti-EPA garbage somewhere else tabasco Aug 2015 #3
okay DustyJoe Aug 2015 #8
(spouts Ronald Reagan talking point) louis-t Aug 2015 #30
One oil and three mining companies already have that locked up. LanternWaste Aug 2015 #37
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/oregon-man-sentenced-30-days-jail-collecting-rainwater-his-property Travis_0004 Aug 2015 #52
If you're thinking of the case in Oregon (a well-known RW talking point) KamaAina Aug 2015 #51
A portion of my drinking water comes from this river.. likesmountains 52 Aug 2015 #4
Well the republicans want to abolish the EPA. Kingofalldems Aug 2015 #5
Link to where anyone wants to abolish the EPA. former9thward Aug 2015 #6
Here you go: Kingofalldems Aug 2015 #7
Must be a long nap RandiFan1290 Aug 2015 #18
.. tosh Aug 2015 #9
You didn't know that many Republicans want to abolish the EPA? stevenleser Aug 2015 #29
Romney never said that. former9thward Aug 2015 #32
Notice I didn't say nominees. Most of the folks who have ran have said so. But in terms of Romney stevenleser Aug 2015 #40
I am not a hyper partisan. former9thward Aug 2015 #43
Here, have some bedtime stories Lancero Aug 2015 #44
I am not going to click that link. former9thward Aug 2015 #46
Uh huh. Lancero Aug 2015 #47
Your game, not mine. former9thward Aug 2015 #48
I forgot, what did you ask for? Lancero Aug 2015 #49
A poster stated the R party wanted to abolish the EPA. former9thward Aug 2015 #50
And you asked to a link to ANYONE wanting to abolish the EPA. Lancero Aug 2015 #53
You don't want to show the previous post I was replying to, do you? former9thward Aug 2015 #54
Keep moving the goalposts. Lancero Aug 2015 #55
Thanks for the kick! former9thward Aug 2015 #56
That mine leaks continuously into the river... hunter Aug 2015 #10
Exactly. This is a Superfund site. Silverton officials opposed the designation and clean up. greatlaurel Aug 2015 #11
oh, how disgusting, gold mine spent/used toxic water :( Sunlei Aug 2015 #12
Where is the outrage these mines have been allowed to leak and degrade these rivers for decades? greatlaurel Aug 2015 #13
Wouldn't it be great if the mining company would have to pay for clean-up? Octafish Aug 2015 #14
To blame the EPA for this is playing into Republican hands. n/t PowerToThePeople Aug 2015 #15
They blamed themselves. former9thward Aug 2015 #17
Did they blame themselves for accumulating millions of gallons of filth? Orrex Aug 2015 #22
No, they blamed themselves for causing the release. former9thward Aug 2015 #23
Well, let me put it another way Orrex Aug 2015 #24
If a company caused the release they would be fined by the EPA. former9thward Aug 2015 #25
You're right--it's the EPA's fault that the company didn't clean up its shit Orrex Aug 2015 #26
It should certainly pay for all the damages done downstream. former9thward Aug 2015 #31
What if the dump had happened on its own, as it certainly would have? Orrex Aug 2015 #33
I reject your "it was only a matter of time" theory. former9thward Aug 2015 #35
Right. The leaky, abandoned, century-old mine would have lasted forever Orrex Aug 2015 #36
Your rejection is predicated on what specific man-made structure which never degraded over time? LanternWaste Aug 2015 #38
I said there was no evidence. former9thward Aug 2015 #39
Why not blame the EPA? Calista241 Aug 2015 #42
Fucking A is the flow still constant with this crap? lonestarnot Aug 2015 #16
That's about 3 minutes of the river's flow rate Recursion Aug 2015 #20
And continues today. What fucking moron did this? lonestarnot Aug 2015 #57
Not that this is a joke but yuiyoshida Aug 2015 #19
Check out entry #5 Orrex Aug 2015 #21
And this is exactly why Blue_In_AK Aug 2015 #27
Yes! Stop them. What are they trying to dig up there? lonestarnot Aug 2015 #59
Copper and gold. Blue_In_AK Aug 2015 #60
Copper and gold can be found elsewhere and this bullshit is not for the greater good use of lonestarnot Aug 2015 #61
Thank you. Blue_In_AK Aug 2015 #62
Navajo Nation of 4 corners is being threatened by spill by EPA from an old mine. We just suck ass. lonestarnot Aug 2015 #63
Republicans on facebook are joyous kwolf68 Aug 2015 #28
Why didn't the mining company clean up their mess before abandoning the mine? B Calm Aug 2015 #34
The mine was abandon in 1920. Calista241 Aug 2015 #41
That's a long time ago. I worked for a cellophane company B Calm Aug 2015 #45
So does the federal government now own the shit? lonestarnot Aug 2015 #58

Igel

(35,320 posts)
1. The EPA will immediate initiate a lawsuit against itself
Fri Aug 7, 2015, 10:15 PM
Aug 2015

and levy fines, will it not?

I mean, it's unforgiving when others do things like this. I expect the same exacting attitude towards itself.

/sarcasm off

DustyJoe

(849 posts)
2. epa, Americas domestic worst enemy
Fri Aug 7, 2015, 10:58 PM
Aug 2015

Hopefully they will provide water for downstream communities and the Navajo tribe. I live 3 miles from the river and 24 miles south of Durango. Domestic water comes from this river for many communities and the the Animas river merges with the San Juan river on the southwest edge of Farmington NM. The feds better activate fema or military to get water to these areas, the plume is over 45 miles long and all the communities have to stop pumping water to their water systems.

http://www.daily-times.com/four_corners-news/ci_28601678/officials-declare-state-emergency-close-animas-river-san

The same epa that sues landowners for letting rainwater collect on private land or in a rain barrel.

 

tabasco

(22,974 posts)
3. Take your anti-EPA garbage somewhere else
Fri Aug 7, 2015, 11:16 PM
Aug 2015

The EPA has never sued anybody for collecting rainwater in a rain barrel. Therefore, you are a liar or believe everything you read on right wing nutjob websites like Fox "News."

In fact, the EPA encourages the collection and use of rain water.


http://water.epa.gov/infrastructure/greeninfrastructure/upload/gi_munichandbook_harvesting.pdf

DustyJoe

(849 posts)
8. okay
Sat Aug 8, 2015, 09:42 AM
Aug 2015

Bring your rah-rah EPA garbage here and get a cold glass of river water to quench your thirst then.

The EPA let some 3 stooges equipment operator breach the containment area and now affects 3 states, the largest native tribe in the US. All irrigation, livestock water, recreation use is shut down for many miles for an unknown time and will poison who knows how much wildlife because the agency that will sue you at the drop of a hat if you let water collect that 'might' get polluted get downstream. Seems like the EPA is going to be known as the worst polluter of 2015. We're the government and we're here to help you.

Let me know if you're in the area and i'll have a cold glass saved and ready for you.

louis-t

(23,295 posts)
30. (spouts Ronald Reagan talking point)
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 02:15 PM
Aug 2015

Yes, of course the EPA "let" some guy "breach the containment area". Did it on purpose, they did. Sat there and watched him do it. Then laughed about it, I'm sure.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
37. One oil and three mining companies already have that locked up.
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 03:40 PM
Aug 2015

" Seems like the EPA is going to be known as the worst polluter of 2015..."

One oil and three mining companies already have that locked up. Bless your little heart. Good luck!

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
52. http://cnsnews.com/news/article/oregon-man-sentenced-30-days-jail-collecting-rainwater-his-property
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 07:56 PM
Aug 2015

It does happen

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
51. If you're thinking of the case in Oregon (a well-known RW talking point)
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 07:22 PM
Aug 2015

it was the state, not the EPA, that sued the landowner, because he was illegally channeling runoff away from the stream that bordered his land.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
29. You didn't know that many Republicans want to abolish the EPA?
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 02:11 PM
Aug 2015

Every four years Republican Presidential candidates talk about how they want to do it.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
40. Notice I didn't say nominees. Most of the folks who have ran have said so. But in terms of Romney
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 04:08 PM
Aug 2015

He and McCain basically wanted to neuter the EPA. So it would still be around, just completely powerless.

former9thward

(32,023 posts)
43. I am not a hyper partisan.
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 04:50 PM
Aug 2015

You can always find candidates running in either party who say out of the park statements just to get some coverage. That does not mean the mainstream party has that position. But if you are a partisan then you take those statements and say "See this party stands for this!" No question the Rs want to weaken the EPA but they do not want to abolish it. The EPA was created by Nixon and Reagan and the two Bush presidents. They increased its budget every year.

Lancero

(3,003 posts)
49. I forgot, what did you ask for?
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 06:58 PM
Aug 2015

Oh yeah - Links to people calling for the EPA to be abolished.

Now a backtrack on thats.

Enjoy your games.

former9thward

(32,023 posts)
50. A poster stated the R party wanted to abolish the EPA.
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 07:19 PM
Aug 2015

I asked for a link to that. None was supplied because that is not their position. They want to weaken it, not abolish it.

Lancero

(3,003 posts)
53. And you asked to a link to ANYONE wanting to abolish the EPA.
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 08:20 PM
Aug 2015

If you meant Republicans, why say anyone?

Don't recall saying that? Here, lemme refresh your memory...

[img][/img]

former9thward

(32,023 posts)
54. You don't want to show the previous post I was replying to, do you?
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 08:24 PM
Aug 2015

Well everyone else can see it and knows the context of my remark. But continue to play your games. BTW thanks for all the kicks!

hunter

(38,317 posts)
10. That mine leaks continuously into the river...
Sat Aug 8, 2015, 11:05 AM
Aug 2015

... so much so that there were no fish miles downstream of it.

If the EPA contractors hadn't busted the thing open by accident, it probably would have busted open on its own someday soon, maybe even releasing more crud.

They were attempting to install a system to dewater the mine, pumping the contaminated water out in a controlled manner and treating it before it got into the river.

The root cause of the pollution wasn't the EPA, it was the crappy mine itself, and the general attitude that "what you can't see can't hurt you;" the head-in-the-sand notion that actually measuring and treating the toxic mine waste would be bad for Colorado's tourism, ranching, and mining industries.

greatlaurel

(2,004 posts)
11. Exactly. This is a Superfund site. Silverton officials opposed the designation and clean up.
Sat Aug 8, 2015, 11:23 AM
Aug 2015

"Holly Jobson, 62, walking at noon along banks where yellow sediment was glomming onto rocks, said Silverton ought to push for a proper federal cleanup around mines. Silverton officials in the past have resisted, fearing the stigma of a federal Superfund cleanup designation and the impact on tourism.

"I don't know why we can't get the best possible cleanup," Jobson said. "This is awful. All that wildlife along the river. It may kill everything. And the water. Rivers are wonderful. And to have this happen?""

http://www.denverpost.com/environment/ci_28601566/animas-river-spill-leaves-durango-officials-edge-waiting?source=pkg

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
12. oh, how disgusting, gold mine spent/used toxic water :(
Sat Aug 8, 2015, 11:30 AM
Aug 2015

can't they make the gold mining corp. suck up up every drop of that toxic water and replace it with fresh water.

Even if they have to pay the costs to fly in and out water tanks with tanker trucks helicopters for several months

greatlaurel

(2,004 posts)
13. Where is the outrage these mines have been allowed to leak and degrade these rivers for decades?
Sat Aug 8, 2015, 11:33 AM
Aug 2015
http://www2.epa.gov/region8/upper-animas-mining-district

"Background

EPA and the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) conducted a Superfund Site Assessment of the site in the 1990s. This assessment identified the severe impacts to aquatic life in the UA and its tributaries from naturally occurring and mining-related heavy metals. It also acknowledged the community-based collaborative effort that was under way at that time to address those impacts. In recognition of the community-based collaborative effort, EPA agreed to postpone adding all or a portion of the site to the Superfund National Priorities List (NPL), as long as progress was being made to improve the water quality of the Animas River.

In support of the collaborative effort, EPA’s Superfund Remedial program has contributed resources for water quality sampling, ecological risk assessment and data analysis. In addition, the Superfund Removal program has contributed resources for the investigation and closure (bulkheading) of the Red and Bonita Mine tunnel.

EPA, through its Ecosystem Protection program, also provides the Colorado Water Quality Division of CDPHE with Nonpoint Source Management program (Section 319) grant funds. ARSG and others have received grants under that program for investigation and cleanup efforts in the watershed.

Until approximately 2005, water quality in the Animas River was improving. However, since 2005, water quality in the Animas River has not improved and, for at least 20 miles below the confluence with Cement Creek, has declined significantly.

Because of this declining water quality in the Animas River, in 2008, EPA’s Superfund Site Assessment program began investigations in Upper Cement Creek focused on evaluating whether the Upper Cement Creek area alone would qualify for inclusion on the NPL. This evaluation indicated that the area would qualify, although after receiving additional community input, EPA again postponed efforts to include the area on the NPL. Since that time, EPA has continued and broadened its investigations of conditions at the site in order to understand the major sources of heavy metal contamination in the UA."



http://www2.epa.gov/region8/gold-king-mine-release-emergency-response

"Gold King Mine Release Emergency Response

(August 7, 2015) — On August 5, 2015, EPA was conducting an investigation of the Gold King Mine. The intent of the investigation was to assess the on-going water releases from the mine and to treat mine water and to assess the feasibility of further mine remediation. The plan was to excavate the loose material that had collapsed into the cave entry back to the timbering. During the excavation, the loose material gave way, opening the adit (mine tunnel) and spilling the water stored behind the collapsed material into Cement Creek, a tributary of the Animas River.

Initial estimates are that the release contained approximately one million gallons of water (estimated from the dimensions of the mine adit) that was held behind unconsolidated debris near an abandoned mine portal. There were several workers at the site at the time of the breach, all were unharmed.

The large pulse of water dissipated in about an hour. Today the water in Cement Creek and the Animas River in Silverton is clearing. The adit is still discharging lower flows into Cement Creek. Today, EPA is rebuilding settling ponds to treat these flows – the upper pond will be completed by early afternoon, and the lower pond by COB or early tomorrow. EPA will treat the mine water diverted to the ponds with caustic soda and flocculent once the ponds are built."

This is a disaster. The real problem is the fact that there are hundreds of superfund sites that are still not cleaned up. One of the most frequent "clean up" strategies is to cover the site and leave it in place. This strategy is cheapfor the corporations thatcreated the mess , but fails to protect citizens and the environment.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
14. Wouldn't it be great if the mining company would have to pay for clean-up?
Sat Aug 8, 2015, 11:34 AM
Aug 2015

Oops. I forgot! It's only fair that We the People pick up the tab, like we do for the warmongers and banksters.

Orrex

(63,215 posts)
22. Did they blame themselves for accumulating millions of gallons of filth?
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 07:10 AM
Aug 2015

Under shoddy, unsustainable conditions? I guess I missed that part.


The accident was the EPA's fault in the same way that an escalator collapse is the fault of the guy who got crushed by it.

Orrex

(63,215 posts)
24. Well, let me put it another way
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 01:23 PM
Aug 2015

The accident was the EPA's fault in the same way that an escalator collapse is the fault of the guy who got crushed by it.


It was a disaster waiting to happen. It's unfortunate that the attempted clean-up hastened the disaster, but the mining company is still at fault.

It's rather like the way Republicans have attacked Obama for failing to correct the Republican-wrought economic disaster fast enough.

former9thward

(32,023 posts)
25. If a company caused the release they would be fined by the EPA.
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 01:50 PM
Aug 2015

And shown no mercy. The EPA causes a disaster and they say "Oh well"... That mine has been inactive since the 1920s. To say a long ago mine company is responsible for something that occurred almost 100 years later is ridiculous.

Orrex

(63,215 posts)
26. You're right--it's the EPA's fault that the company didn't clean up its shit
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 01:59 PM
Aug 2015

What, exactly, do you think the EPA should have done instead?

How, exactly, do you think the EPA should punish itself?

What, exactly, do you think should be changed for next time?

How, exactly, should this almost entirely toothless agency fulfill its duties when it's been aggressively opposed by corporate interests and corporate-friendly legislators for decades?

former9thward

(32,023 posts)
31. It should certainly pay for all the damages done downstream.
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 03:00 PM
Aug 2015

As it would require any company to do. What would you do? Dig up the mine owner's from their graves and make them pay?

Orrex

(63,215 posts)
33. What if the dump had happened on its own, as it certainly would have?
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 03:10 PM
Aug 2015

As was noted upthread, the mine was already poisoning the river, and it was only a matter of time before the dump occurred anyway.

Who should have been fined in that case?

Orrex

(63,215 posts)
36. Right. The leaky, abandoned, century-old mine would have lasted forever
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 03:34 PM
Aug 2015

Leaking consistently, as it's been doing for decades. But that's apparently fine.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
38. Your rejection is predicated on what specific man-made structure which never degraded over time?
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 03:43 PM
Aug 2015

Your rejection is predicated on what specific man-made structure which never degraded over time?

former9thward

(32,023 posts)
39. I said there was no evidence.
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 03:46 PM
Aug 2015

You have never been to the site and you did not see what happened. Yet you appear to know everything about it.

Calista241

(5,586 posts)
42. Why not blame the EPA?
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 04:33 PM
Aug 2015

They're the ones that went in there and unleashed this disaster.

By and large, the EPA does good work in this country, but this is a colossal fuck up.

The better strategy is to clean this the fuck up and draw attention to the need to clean up the other toxic shitholes in our country.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
20. That's about 3 minutes of the river's flow rate
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 07:07 AM
Aug 2015

And if I'm reading it right the discharge happened over the course of two days.

yuiyoshida

(41,832 posts)
19. Not that this is a joke but
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 06:41 AM
Aug 2015

Wasn't it that government guy in the Ghost Buster movie that ordered the shut down of their containment system, thus setting all of that energy free? Sorry, for some reason, this reminded me of that, the government making things accidentally worse....

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
27. And this is exactly why
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 02:00 PM
Aug 2015

the Pebble Mine at the headwaters of Bristol Bay, one of the last great salmon spawning areas on earth, must be stopped. There is NO safe way to contain this crap.

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
60. Copper and gold.
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 08:34 PM
Aug 2015

I don't have anything against mining, per se, but they really need to protect the waters. Pebble is truly a horrifying prospect, and I urge everyone to lobby whoever they can to stop this.

This is a good place to start:

http://www.savebristolbay.org/about-the-bay/about-pebble-mine

 

lonestarnot

(77,097 posts)
61. Copper and gold can be found elsewhere and this bullshit is not for the greater good use of
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 08:37 PM
Aug 2015

finite resource. Fuck the enrichment of these mine owner fuckwits to the sacrifice of the greater good! I will start!

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
62. Thank you.
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 08:42 PM
Aug 2015

It is a serious issue here and almost universally opposed except among certain power brokers. We keep having small victories and small defeats ... what really needs to happen is for the land to be declared off limits in perpetuity, as a national park or monument, or somehow set aside to prevent this kind of atrocity. You are right, copper and gold can be found other, less sensitive, places. To potentially destroy this tremendous renewable resource - i.e., the fish - for some short-term profit of a very few people is insane. Not to mention if there were ever a breach in this earthen dam, all of the people in the villages downstream would be threatened.

 

lonestarnot

(77,097 posts)
63. Navajo Nation of 4 corners is being threatened by spill by EPA from an old mine. We just suck ass.
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 08:48 PM
Aug 2015

kwolf68

(7,365 posts)
28. Republicans on facebook are joyous
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 02:07 PM
Aug 2015

They are so stupid. It wasn't like the EPA was TRYING to pollute the river. Good god...I am glad they are now "concerned" about the environment, but in their feeble minds they forget that the companies that produced this nasty shit have NOT PAID for the cleanup, which should be a FACTOR of production. FREE market economics says the factors of production in bringing a product to market should be borne by the consumer. But it's not....companies rape the environment, sell their shit at below market wages, the product demand outstrips supply and the government (taxpayers, people NOT privvy to the transaction) take on some of the "costs of production".

Simple Econ 101...their hatred for the EPA and the government (except those parts of government involved in killing people and waging wars) is so strong they totally miss the fact their own stupid principles are being sacrificed for idle hatred. That's assuming they even fucking know what free market economics REALLY is. Hell, they constantly get socialism all messed up, I am sure they lack general understanding of market economics as well.

DOLTS!
 

B Calm

(28,762 posts)
45. That's a long time ago. I worked for a cellophane company
Mon Aug 10, 2015, 05:23 PM
Aug 2015

that was open in 1956 and closed down in 1997. The company is a fortune 500 company even today. We had two unlined landfills on the property and the garbage was covered over everyday with coal ash from the powerhouse. They left the mess buried in the ground and this old abandoned landfill is on the banks of the Wabash River. The fortune 500 company that ran the factory sold it to an unscrupulous business man who ran it for ten years and then filed bankruptcy. I look for this landfill to come back and haunt us someday and the taxpayers will end up paying to clean it up.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»EPA Workers trigger 1 mil...