Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

RiffRandell

(5,909 posts) Fri Aug 7, 2015, 10:34 PM Aug 2015

Donald Trump is in The Twilight Zone.

Apologies to Shatner, Christine White as his passenger, Nick Cravat as Gremlin and Rod Serling.

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Donald Trump is in The Twilight Zone. (Original Post) RiffRandell Aug 2015 OP

Well done gwheezie Aug 2015 #1

Wonder what those 200 mph winds on that wing did to his hair (or fur) aint_no_life_nowhere Aug 2015 #2

Probably something better than he does with it himself. Marie Marie Aug 2015 #3

No, not that one. This one! longship Aug 2015 #4

gwheezie

(3,580 posts)

1. Well done

Reply to RiffRandell (Original post)

Fri Aug 7, 2015, 10:37 PM

Aug 2015

I really did lol. Perfect.

aint_no_life_nowhere

(21,925 posts)

2. Wonder what those 200 mph winds on that wing did to his hair (or fur)

Reply to RiffRandell (Original post)

Fri Aug 7, 2015, 10:37 PM

Aug 2015

Marie Marie

(9,999 posts)

3. Probably something better than he does with it himself.

Reply to aint_no_life_nowhere (Reply #2)

Sat Aug 8, 2015, 12:47 AM

Aug 2015

longship

(40,416 posts)

4. No, not that one. This one!

Reply to RiffRandell (Original post)

Sat Aug 8, 2015, 01:32 AM

Aug 2015

Twilight Zone, Four O'Clock.

Starring the recently late Theodore Bikel, who was a great Democrat.

But in Four O'Clock he plays a despicable, hateful person, just like was evident in Ohio last night.

That is the iconic Twilight Zone episode that connects with last night's GOP candidate debate.

Rod Serling was a really nice guy, but he apparently had a sharp wit and was prescient.

Reply to this discussion