Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBen Carson doesn't apologize for fetal tissue research, because it was never about that.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2015/08/13/the_planned_parenthood_attacks_aren_t_about_fetal_tissue_revelations_about.htmlAs seen in the Slatest this morning, Dr. Ben Carsonwho has been hungrily exploiting right-wing hay-making over Planned Parenthood donating fetal tissue to researchhas done research using fetal tissue himself. Credit to OB-GYN and pro-choice blogger Dr. Jen Gunter, who found Carson's 1992 paper on research done using fetal samples obtained from abortions.
Carson's response? His case was different. Why? Because it just was.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 753 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ben Carson doesn't apologize for fetal tissue research, because it was never about that. (Original Post)
gollygee
Aug 2015
OP
lordsummerisle
(4,651 posts)1. I looked up hypocrisy in the dictionary
and there was a picture of Ben Carson...
Suich
(10,642 posts)2. I thought I heard him say the tissue he used
was not from abortions.
gollygee
(22,336 posts)3. Well, if you believe what he wrote at the time . . .
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2015/08/13/ben_carson_fetal_tissue_research_neurosurgeon_s_1992_paper_involved_material.html
While opining on the uselessness of fetal tissue research to Megyn Kelly Dr. Carson neglected to mention his own paper Colloid Cysts of the Third Ventricle: Immunohistochemical evidence for nonneuropithelial differentiation published in Hum Pathol 23:811-816 in 1992. The materials and methods describe using human choroid plexus ependyma and nasal mucosa from two fetuses aborted in the ninth and 17th week of gestation."
While opining on the uselessness of fetal tissue research to Megyn Kelly Dr. Carson neglected to mention his own paper Colloid Cysts of the Third Ventricle: Immunohistochemical evidence for nonneuropithelial differentiation published in Hum Pathol 23:811-816 in 1992. The materials and methods describe using human choroid plexus ependyma and nasal mucosa from two fetuses aborted in the ninth and 17th week of gestation."
enlightenment
(8,830 posts)5. Not defending the guy
because he is an absolute tool - but "aborted" can refer to miscarriage as well as termination.
840high
(17,196 posts)6. Yes it can.
malaise
(269,022 posts)4. He didn't expect to get caught
Fugging hypocrite - he should really know better
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)7. Here's why it's different:
Dr. Carson got paid for his work and paper. He's not getting any coin from fetal tissue anymore, so now it's bad, bad, bad. Oh, and he would like Republican dimwits to vote for him. So, you know, totally different.