Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
Sun Aug 16, 2015, 04:59 AM Aug 2015

Half of the money raised for the presidential elections comes from just 130 families

The Affluent Ante Up for the Presidency


When the Republican candidates for president expounded on what they would do for ordinary Americans in their debate this month, they neglected to mention that more than half the money underpinning their campaigns has been coming from just 130 big-spending families and the businesses they run. These families are determined to influence the election with six- and seven-figure checks.

The stark, sad truth of modern campaigning is that a small pool of the richest Americans is making the candidates in both parties increasingly dependent on special-interest money. Fewer than 400 of the nation’s most affluent families have supplied almost half of the money raised so far by presidential candidates in both parties, according a survey of federal campaign data by The Times.


This is an alarming new direction in modern campaigning that arose along with the nation’s growing income disparity and is empowered by shadowy new methods of raising unlimited, untraceable money from the richest donors.



Hillary Rodham Clinton’s formal campaign celebrates large-scale support from small-dollar donors, but her affiliated super PAC reported that most of its $15 million came from nine donors giving $1 million each. Some of the money, as is the case in rival campaigns, is untraceable because of another cynical innovation — “social welfare” nonprofit groups. Fueled by the Supreme Court’s reckless Citizens United decision in 2010, which ended limits on campaign spending by corporations and unions, spending by exempt organizations that do not have to disclose donors increased 60-fold to more than $300 million in the 2012 presidential cycle, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. An even bigger infusion is expected in 2016.


Mrs. Clinton has, to her credit, promised to make campaign reform one of her main priorities if she wins..............................



http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/15/opinion/the-affluent-ante-up-for-the-presidency.html
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Half of the money raised for the presidential elections comes from just 130 families (Original Post) Ichingcarpenter Aug 2015 OP
Mrs. Clinton madokie Aug 2015 #1
HRC And The Republicans Are The Primary Beneficiaries cantbeserious Aug 2015 #2
How many families will the Presidents come from?... n/t PoliticAverse Aug 2015 #3
K&R Waiting For Everyman Aug 2015 #4
If you're in one of those families, LuvNewcastle Aug 2015 #5

madokie

(51,076 posts)
1. Mrs. Clinton
Sun Aug 16, 2015, 05:08 AM
Aug 2015

will promise anything to get elected. End of story

Bernie Sanders Will be our next President.

LuvNewcastle

(16,846 posts)
5. If you're in one of those families,
Sun Aug 16, 2015, 09:32 AM
Aug 2015

I'm sure you could get away with just about anything. I'd be curious to find out some history on those families. Why the hell don't we have gossip columnists anymore? I mean, I know we do, but they talk about boring stars. Just think of the stories we'd hear about the princes of the one percent.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Half of the money raised ...