Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHalf of the money raised for the presidential elections comes from just 130 families
The Affluent Ante Up for the PresidencyWhen the Republican candidates for president expounded on what they would do for ordinary Americans in their debate this month, they neglected to mention that more than half the money underpinning their campaigns has been coming from just 130 big-spending families and the businesses they run. These families are determined to influence the election with six- and seven-figure checks.
The stark, sad truth of modern campaigning is that a small pool of the richest Americans is making the candidates in both parties increasingly dependent on special-interest money. Fewer than 400 of the nations most affluent families have supplied almost half of the money raised so far by presidential candidates in both parties, according a survey of federal campaign data by The Times.
This is an alarming new direction in modern campaigning that arose along with the nations growing income disparity and is empowered by shadowy new methods of raising unlimited, untraceable money from the richest donors.
Hillary Rodham Clintons formal campaign celebrates large-scale support from small-dollar donors, but her affiliated super PAC reported that most of its $15 million came from nine donors giving $1 million each. Some of the money, as is the case in rival campaigns, is untraceable because of another cynical innovation social welfare nonprofit groups. Fueled by the Supreme Courts reckless Citizens United decision in 2010, which ended limits on campaign spending by corporations and unions, spending by exempt organizations that do not have to disclose donors increased 60-fold to more than $300 million in the 2012 presidential cycle, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. An even bigger infusion is expected in 2016.
Mrs. Clinton has, to her credit, promised to make campaign reform one of her main priorities if she wins..............................
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/15/opinion/the-affluent-ante-up-for-the-presidency.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 728 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Half of the money raised for the presidential elections comes from just 130 families (Original Post)
Ichingcarpenter
Aug 2015
OP
madokie
(51,076 posts)1. Mrs. Clinton
will promise anything to get elected. End of story
Bernie Sanders Will be our next President.
cantbeserious
(13,039 posts)2. HRC And The Republicans Are The Primary Beneficiaries
eom
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)3. How many families will the Presidents come from?... n/t
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)4. K&R
LuvNewcastle
(16,846 posts)5. If you're in one of those families,
I'm sure you could get away with just about anything. I'd be curious to find out some history on those families. Why the hell don't we have gossip columnists anymore? I mean, I know we do, but they talk about boring stars. Just think of the stories we'd hear about the princes of the one percent.