Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBe careful what you wish for - Monsanto’s coming up with an alternative to GMOs
Monsantos coming up with an alternative to GMOs
Grist
8/13/15
Sharpen your talons, Monsanto haters. Everyones favorite biotech company is cooking up a new GMO alternative, and its just begging to be crucified.
The new technology, called BioDirect, is a kind of temporary, spray-on defense mechanism for plants. It relies on a natural phenomenon called RNA interference that scientists can use to block crucial genes in, say, Roundup-resistant weeds or killer pests. MIT Technology Reviews Antonio Regalado took a deep dive into the new technology, and it sounds a bit like an Arnold Schwarzenegger character. No one has ever tried spraying RNA on thousands of acres of crops before, so it does raise some legitimate concerns.
Heres how it works: All living things contain DNA, and that DNA carries the genetic information that cells need to make proteins. But its actually RNA, DNAs less famous workhorse of a partner, that takes that genetic information out into the cell to get shit done. Viruses also use RNA, however, so cells have a kind of defense mechanism to detect viral RNA, memorize its contents, destroy it, and then hunts down its progeny to destroy them too.
Told you it was kind of badass.
With a little tweak, however, this defense mechanism can be turned against itself, so that a cell starts attacking its own genetic code. Thats where BioDirect comes in. Using spray-on RNA that looks like viral RNA but is actually genetic information from weeds or pests or whatever it is Monsanto wants to target, the company can effectively turn the enemy against itself. It could even use BioDirect to target certain genes in crops themselves in order to make those crops, for example, drought resistant....
Read the rest here~
http://grist.org/news/monsantos-coming-up-with-an-alternative-to-gmos/
Grist
8/13/15
Sharpen your talons, Monsanto haters. Everyones favorite biotech company is cooking up a new GMO alternative, and its just begging to be crucified.
The new technology, called BioDirect, is a kind of temporary, spray-on defense mechanism for plants. It relies on a natural phenomenon called RNA interference that scientists can use to block crucial genes in, say, Roundup-resistant weeds or killer pests. MIT Technology Reviews Antonio Regalado took a deep dive into the new technology, and it sounds a bit like an Arnold Schwarzenegger character. No one has ever tried spraying RNA on thousands of acres of crops before, so it does raise some legitimate concerns.
Heres how it works: All living things contain DNA, and that DNA carries the genetic information that cells need to make proteins. But its actually RNA, DNAs less famous workhorse of a partner, that takes that genetic information out into the cell to get shit done. Viruses also use RNA, however, so cells have a kind of defense mechanism to detect viral RNA, memorize its contents, destroy it, and then hunts down its progeny to destroy them too.
Told you it was kind of badass.
With a little tweak, however, this defense mechanism can be turned against itself, so that a cell starts attacking its own genetic code. Thats where BioDirect comes in. Using spray-on RNA that looks like viral RNA but is actually genetic information from weeds or pests or whatever it is Monsanto wants to target, the company can effectively turn the enemy against itself. It could even use BioDirect to target certain genes in crops themselves in order to make those crops, for example, drought resistant....
Read the rest here~
http://grist.org/news/monsantos-coming-up-with-an-alternative-to-gmos/
As a person concerned about honey bees, and all pollinators, I was wondering if this would be better, same, or worse for their survival.
Looks like no one knows just yet, acc to the MIT "deep dive" referenced above~
Last year the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency asked a panel of experts to help it decide how to regulate RNA insecticides, including sprays as well as those incorporated into a plants genes. In an 81-page letter to the agency, Monsanto lobbied against any special rules. It said RNA products should actually be spared safety tests it called irrelevant, including those designed to assess whether they were toxic to rodents and whether they could cause allergies, as well as in-depth studies of what happens to the molecules in the environment. Only proteins cause allergies, Monsanto said. And when the company doused dirt with RNA, it degraded and was undetectable after 48 hours.
Company research probably wont ever satisfy critics. The National Honey Bee Advisory Board told the EPA that using RNA interference at this point would put natural systems at the epitome of risk and could be as regrettable as our earlier embrace of DDT. We are decades away from enough scientific understanding to allow sustainable and predictable use of this technology under field conditions, they said. The beekeepers worry that pollinators could be hurt by unintended effects. They made the point that the genomes of many insects arent yet known, so scientists cant predict whether their genes will match an RNA target.
http://www.technologyreview.com/featuredstory/540136/the-next-great-gmo-debate/
Company research probably wont ever satisfy critics. The National Honey Bee Advisory Board told the EPA that using RNA interference at this point would put natural systems at the epitome of risk and could be as regrettable as our earlier embrace of DDT. We are decades away from enough scientific understanding to allow sustainable and predictable use of this technology under field conditions, they said. The beekeepers worry that pollinators could be hurt by unintended effects. They made the point that the genomes of many insects arent yet known, so scientists cant predict whether their genes will match an RNA target.
http://www.technologyreview.com/featuredstory/540136/the-next-great-gmo-debate/
I'm of the mind that You Don't Mess With Mother Nature. We're messing too much....
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 1706 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (13)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Be careful what you wish for - Monsanto’s coming up with an alternative to GMOs (Original Post)
RiverLover
Aug 2015
OP
Cleita
(75,480 posts)1. What if I wish for Monsanto crashing and going bankrupt? eom
-none
(1,884 posts)2. It it comes from Monsanto, it can't be good.
Their first GMO insecticide all be decimated the Monarch Butterfly.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)5. That so breaks my heart.
Igel
(35,309 posts)6. It's complicated.
ananda
(28,860 posts)3. Is there anything we can spray on Monsanto ...
... to just make it go away?
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)4. I'd invest in that new spray!
pnwmom
(108,978 posts)7. What could possibly go wrong?
ncjustice80
(948 posts)8. Oh.My.God.
Is Monsanto TRYING to cause an apocalypse? I wish something would be done about them