Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

midnight

(26,624 posts)
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 12:10 AM Aug 2015

Poverty Is A Weapon Of Mass Destruction

"51 years ago this week, President Johnson signed a $1 billion anti-poverty bill called the Economic Opportunity Act. "Freedom," he said, "is not enough." The Act initiated a range of programs including:

Basic education, training and jobs for young people and work-study programs for economically challenged college students;
Adult literacy and work training programs;
Funding and volunteer programs for non-profit organizations that focus on improving conditions for the poor;
Medical and health assistance;
Loans to rural families to give them a chance to get on their feet;
Assistance to migrant farm workers to ensure that their basic needs are met; and
Loans for very small businesses that stand a chance to increase employment.
Did it work? It's hard to tell and might have a lot to do with what answer a person is looking for. The government says that poverty dropped from 19% to under 15% in about two years and by 1967 was starting creep back up and ended right back at 19% in a decade or two. But a new study by some economists at Columbia University states that poverty might have dropped, overall, by 40% (if you take a little bit more into consideration than what the Census Bureau totaled up).

But if poverty really did start creeping back up in 1967, maybe it's because it started getting bad-mouthed by Republicans. Nixon joined that chorus and said there was "profit in poverty," which somehow justified diverting the funds of the Act to the Vietnam War. Reagan pretty much gutted the Act. Just recently, Congress cut aid to the SNAP program by $8 billion over the next ten years -- and states got so excited that they joined in with great ideas like not letting poor people buy steak or fish, cookies, energy drinks, lottery tickets or go to the movies."

http://crooksandliars.com/2015/08/poverty-weapon-mass-destruction

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Poverty Is A Weapon Of Mass Destruction (Original Post) midnight Aug 2015 OP
Perhaps the most destructive. nt malokvale77 Aug 2015 #1
It sure can take generations to recover from too. midnight Aug 2015 #2
K&R! nt Mnemosyne Aug 2015 #3
Yes, Sherman A1 Aug 2015 #4
And sometimes Iwillnevergiveup Aug 2015 #5
Yes. Poverty is a huge safety issue. Maybe it's time to start speaking in those terms. midnight Aug 2015 #7
Yes, it is. mmonk Aug 2015 #6
Thanks for your input. midnight Aug 2015 #9
K&R n/t OneGrassRoot Aug 2015 #8

midnight

(26,624 posts)
7. Yes. Poverty is a huge safety issue. Maybe it's time to start speaking in those terms.
Thu Aug 20, 2015, 08:27 PM
Aug 2015
http://www.exposingtruth.com/swiss-to-pay-basic-income-for-all/

Imagine you are being born and society tells you ‘Welcome, you will be cared for, and asks you what you want to do with your life, what is your calling? Imagine that feeling, that’s a whole different atmosphere “ – Daniel Straub, Co-founder, Basic Income Initiative

Parliament was presented with a petition signed by over 100,000 people, proposing to afford every citizen, regardless if they are working or not, a monthly paycheck of 2,500 Swiss francs. To mark the day, a truck full of 8 million five-cent coins was deposited on the square and spread out in front of the Swiss Parliament in Bern, supporters gathered around and spread the coins out using shovels. A typical fast-food worker in the US earns roughly $1,500 per month. Anything less than that specified amount of 2,500 francs, would be deemed illegal, even for people working in one of the lowest paid jobs.

swisssA date for the vote itself is yet to be confirmed, however, it could take place before the end of this year, depending on the decision of the Swiss government. The money to fund the measure would likely be supplied by the Swiss social insurance system, so in other words it would be taken from taxpayers. We know that the government has no money itself, everything that it gives to others it must first take from others or print it out of thin air. But, are individuals who receive these funds going to be participating tax payers as well? If not, is it safe to assume that the more individuals who rely on this system, and the fewer who are contributing and fueling it, the more unlikely it is to run out of funds? Is this only possible due to Switzerland’s low population and impressive bank profits?

This new system will force business owners to pay their workers a certain wage, regardless if their labor is considered worth less than the stipulated amount. This idea aims to set the minimum standard of living higher, and that is admirable. But this might prompt business owners to take their company elsewhere, to where they have more freedom over the decision of what wages they are going to pay. Of course this would also mean they get no cut whatsoever of the Swiss market. And on the other hand, the new income may also allure new business owners to the country in looks of attracting those new consumers. One prominent CEO in Switzerland has stated that if the measure passes, he would seriously contemplate moving his company out of the country:"



Read more: http://www.exposingtruth.com/swiss-to-pay-basic-income-for-all/#ixzz3jP9Y0Mwt
Follow us: @Exposing4Truth on Twitter | ExposingTheTruth on Facebook
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Poverty Is A Weapon Of Ma...