General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhite Louisiana Residents Revolt Over Naming Street For MLK
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/st-bernard-parish-martin-luther-kingOther white residents had more racially-charged reasons to oppose the name change:
If you look around the world, every Martin Luther King Boulevard is crime-ridden and drug-ridden. Why the hell would we want that in this parish? All because a few people want it. The rest of us dont, said one white resident. Its absolutely ridiculous. Martin Luther King was a great man, and all the streets that are named after him does not reflect the content of that mans character.
(snip)
But some of the white residents rejected the suggestion that their opposition was racially motivated.
Ive never had a racist bone in my body, said one white resident. But if you keep pushing me, Ill show you my racist ways. Mitch Landrieu can go to hell, praise to lord for Bobby Jindal.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)is it really necessary for every city to have a street named after him?
randys1
(16,286 posts)in different directions.
Or 3.
Then we need to get reparations going...AT A MINIMUM
Rex
(65,616 posts)I can't think of one.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)How about Julian Bond? Jimmy Carter? Maya Angelou? Elie Wiesel? Just to name a few.
Igel
(35,362 posts)we should honor everybody who has no reason for us to avoid honoring him/her.
"If there's a reason not to honor Cathie B. Smith with a street, come forward now, otherwise we'll have Cathie B. Smith Boulevard. Okay, now for John Byrd Boulevard ... Is there a reason not to honor John Byrd? And his wife, Winnie Byrd? Moving on to the Mrs. B. Smith's son, Pete Smith, and the way to be named after him, then to Joe Pete Smith, Pete's father, and his avenue...."
1. Not every great person needs a street named after him. Otherwise I expect a Lafayette Street or Boulevard in every city and town over 1000, and demand at the very least a Kosciuszko Plaza in every town of more than 500. Wouldn't even hurt to have the occasional Martin Luther Street, to be honest, given the role the Reformation played in the Enlightenment.
2. One doesn't name streets after somebody just because there's no reason not to. Unless you're making some sort of development and need to have nifty, placid, computer-generated street names for 100 streets without having to think about it. Saw one community that had a whole neighborhood with street names with the Latin words for trees, but not a soul had an inkling that they were Latin tree names--Acer, Quercus, etc.
3. Even those with blemishes--and MLK wasn't sinless, dying for our sins and resurrected the third day to sit at the Father's right hand, to be sure--can be worthy of being dignified by a community. The difficulty is in deciding where to draw the community boundaries. Currently they're drawn very large when a given community needs to be included, and drawn very small and a specific community needs to be ignored. The principle seems to be power itself. Which is both alluring, seductive, and depressing.
4. Most street names are meaningless. I lived in an area with streets named after the two young men who killed a British commander, the dead British commander who invaded the area, a former state governor, and the town that had a white-separatist uprising back in the 1920s or '30s. Apart from the two young men, nobody had a clue who or what the other streets were named after, when, or why. And I only know now because I found out 37 years after I moved away, when my list of things I was curious enough about to check into got down to that level of trivia. I'd go for naming everything N-S "street," everything E-W "road," and using numbers. "I live at the corner of 212 St and -193 Rd."
shenmue
(38,506 posts)ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)Just like every city should have a Rosa Parks.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)My point is that there are many who should be honored and are not.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Trader Joe's in Berkeley is at the corner of University Avenue and -- you guessed it -- Martin Luther King, Jr. Way. (Maybe it's not crime- or drug-ridden because it's a way and not a boulevard? ) The former Grove Street was for years the boundary east of which African Americans could not live in south Berkeley and north Oakland.
Huh? Mitch Landrieu is the mayor of NOLA. I doubt he gives much thought to neighboring St. Bernard Parish.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Igel
(35,362 posts)Not like that ever happens.
romanic
(2,841 posts)that mostly has to do with MLK streets being located in majority black areas that hold a majority of poverty which breeds a majority of crime. So don't blame other black people for wanting an MLK st, blame the city "leaders" that put his name on a shitty area with no opportunities or way out for the people that live there.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Sorry, someone had to say it
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)it is located below New Orleans, right along the ill-fated Mississippi River Gulf Outlet. The entire parish (county) took several feet of storm surge. To this day it has regained only about half its population. So you'd think its citizenry would have more pressing concerns than a street name.
mnhtnbb
(31,408 posts)about Katrina being replayed.
And yes, we have an MLK, Jr., Blvd in Chapel Hill, NC. It is neither drug nor crime ridden
and is a major route in/out of town.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)They all beg the boss to work that day at straight time, none of that time and a half or double time so-called "holiday" pay. Right?