Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
8. Please quit using that slur, based on another slur. The only power this slur
Reply to KG (Reply #1)
Mon Aug 31, 2015, 12:07 PM
Aug 2015

gets is from the same source "homosexual" was/is used as a slur. There can be no other way for "ammosexual" to have a denigrating use if it Were Not based on a previously institutionalzed form of sexual slur.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
3. "I apologize, during the break I was informed that"
Mon Aug 31, 2015, 07:16 AM
Aug 2015

"I apologize, during the break I was informed that Senator Sanders may not have introduced legislation to provide guns to all schoolchildren for open carry. One of my staff read this on the Democratic Underground web site, but we cannot confirm it at this time."

retrowire

(10,345 posts)
4. lmao good one
Mon Aug 31, 2015, 07:38 AM
Aug 2015

the other day when they were talking about Trump she seemed somewhat excited about him. I know she's supposed to be unbiased but... ugh... you guys listen to it, there is a line she said that needed no context.

soon after they got a caller that literally said "so you guys are talking about all the candidates except one I've noticed. everyone has noticed because there's kind of a media blackout on him. Bernie Sanders! what do you guys think of him?"

that made them finally talk about him. it's so fucking obvious how they avoid the mention of his name, no matter how relevant he is.

d_legendary1

(2,586 posts)
6. I don't know about Americans in general
Mon Aug 31, 2015, 10:04 AM
Aug 2015

but I do know about some politicians who are afraid of money bombs from the NRA should they step out of line.

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
7. A serious discussion would be about the tolerance of violence, period
Mon Aug 31, 2015, 10:08 AM
Aug 2015

Instead of focusing only on violence done by one specific means as if the inanimate objects used cause the violence.

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
10. This is a MSM coordinated effort, coming out of NPR...
Mon Aug 31, 2015, 12:17 PM
Aug 2015

Entire "On Point" broadcast (1 hr) on NPR this A.M. was on "Gun Violence," with all the guests known figures in the gun-control outlook; even the callers (few) were uniformly calling for a variety of controls with (as expected) no counter-arguments against Hemenway, et al. And that 33,000 figure of gun deaths? NO MENTION that 2/3 were from suicide, yet most of the discussion -- esp. from the moderator -- was centered on homicides.

I have no problem with advocacy journalism, but NPR should devote an hour to the "other side." Journalists know full well that 2A advocates are a highly motivated and widespread movement which doesn't pass up opportunities to comment on gun matters.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»America's Tolerance For G...