Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

raccoon

(31,111 posts)
Mon Aug 31, 2015, 07:59 AM Aug 2015

Should there be a public information campaign to tell people that Social Security isn't enough to

live on?

I'm sure most people here know that, but I've heard it mentioned here that some people don't know that.
And I've known a few in RL that didn't know that.

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Should there be a public information campaign to tell people that Social Security isn't enough to (Original Post) raccoon Aug 2015 OP
What is even sadder is that some people haven't payed in to social security mucifer Aug 2015 #1
Not to go primary-ish, but O'Malley's SS plan addresses that Recursion Aug 2015 #16
What Difference Would That Make When One Lives Paycheck To Paycheck Thanks To The 1% cantbeserious Aug 2015 #2
Oh, I think most people know that. Le Taz Hot Aug 2015 #3
I'm aware that many people don't make squat, and it's hard to see how they could save anything. raccoon Aug 2015 #4
and some are eager to take it early and get less forever...some have to because they literally can't CTyankee Aug 2015 #11
67 + 8 Matariki Aug 2015 #12
that was 10 years ago so I figure that things had changed... CTyankee Aug 2015 #13
Yes. Exactly. Matariki Aug 2015 #14
I thought about continuing to work at the part time job even after I inherited enough CTyankee Aug 2015 #17
No. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Aug 2015 #5
You are exactly right! Vinca Aug 2015 #6
Step #1: Raise the cap. n/t bvf Aug 2015 #7
/\_/\_This right here_/\_/\ Scuba Aug 2015 #8
...... bigwillq Aug 2015 #10
While you're at it, fadedrose Aug 2015 #9
That's always been the official line, hasn't it? Recursion Aug 2015 #15

mucifer

(23,550 posts)
1. What is even sadder is that some people haven't payed in to social security
Mon Aug 31, 2015, 08:01 AM
Aug 2015

so they won't get a check. Those people might have lived hard lives being an unpaid caregiver to a relative.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
16. Not to go primary-ish, but O'Malley's SS plan addresses that
Mon Aug 31, 2015, 02:25 PM
Aug 2015

It gives SS credits to people doing child or elder care. I hope all the candidates adopt it.

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
3. Oh, I think most people know that.
Mon Aug 31, 2015, 08:10 AM
Aug 2015

The question is, in today's economy, after the 2008 downturn and the one we're about to face again, how do people, a) save money and b) hold onto it without having to spend it to survive during these (planned) "downturn" times?

raccoon

(31,111 posts)
4. I'm aware that many people don't make squat, and it's hard to see how they could save anything.
Mon Aug 31, 2015, 08:13 AM
Aug 2015

But I think it's better to know that SS won't be enough to live on than to for someone to think it will be, and get
an unpleasant surprise.

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
11. and some are eager to take it early and get less forever...some have to because they literally can't
Mon Aug 31, 2015, 12:04 PM
Aug 2015

work any more because of numerous health problems. But if you are reasonably able bodied and can hold onto your job, you should wait til 65 + 4 months as I did. I did take a part time job tho...

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
13. that was 10 years ago so I figure that things had changed...
Mon Aug 31, 2015, 01:35 PM
Aug 2015

wow, 67 + 8 is terrible. I wouldn't have lasted that long as every woman staff member in my organization over the age of 60 was systematically being edged out.

Matariki

(18,775 posts)
14. Yes. Exactly.
Mon Aug 31, 2015, 02:11 PM
Aug 2015

Most people in my field (software development) are under forty. And male.

I was mistaken, it's 66 + 8. Still. I expect I'll be working until 70 given how hard it is to save enough for retirement and how little social security provides.

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
17. I thought about continuing to work at the part time job even after I inherited enough
Mon Aug 31, 2015, 04:08 PM
Aug 2015

money to retire and live ok. But I got tired of it and even tho I was part time, I was asked to do more and more "little extras" here and there and that was wearying. I really liked the organization and my boss but she was one of those people who just worked all the time and never stopped so I think she thought everyone else wanted to do the same. When she became a grandmother for the secoond time she decided she wanted to be withher grandkids and retired herself.

fadedrose

(10,044 posts)
9. While you're at it,
Mon Aug 31, 2015, 08:33 AM
Aug 2015

tell them that the deductibles on Medicare can't be met because of living costs, and Medicare is not free, an average of a hundred or so is taken out of every SS check. Lots of folks don't go to doctors any more. And some doctors won't take medicare because allowances aren't high enough for them, but the cost of medicare has risen.

Bernie wants to expand SS. Increasing benefits and raising the caps on salaries taxed for social security. They should include the types of income not taxable for SS now - interest, dividends, etc.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
15. That's always been the official line, hasn't it?
Mon Aug 31, 2015, 02:21 PM
Aug 2015

The whole "3 legged stool" thing of SS + savings + pension?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should there be a public ...