General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat the RNC’s pathetic loyalty pledge says about the GOP
By Paul Waldman September 3 at 12:10 PM
Some news outlets are reporting that Donald Trump will sign the loyalty pledge that the Republican National Committee has demanded of its candidates, in an apparent effort to foreclose the possibility that Trump will run as a third-party candidate if he doesnt win the GOP nomination. Trump has scheduled a news conference for this afternoon where hell make his announcement.
Something tells me that Trump figures that by the time the party gets its nominee, either itll be him, or hell be bored of running for president by then and wont want to bother running a long-shot third party candidacy almost sure to fail. On the other hand, if he really wanted to break the pledge because America so desperately needs his super-classy, gold-plated leadership, then he would do it in an instant.
But beyond the question of whether Trump will honor the pledge, this whole affair is an excellent demonstration of just how limited the modern political partys power is.
Back in the good old days, parties picked their presidential nominees in the proverbial smoke-filled room, where the bigwigs would get together and make whatever choice they thought was best. There was plenty of factional maneuvering, infighting and intrigue, but the voters were only a tangential part of the process. Then between the 1968 and 1972 elections, both parties reformed their nomination processes to ensure that convention delegates would be selected by primaries and caucuses, which delivered power into the voters hands. That meant that anybody could run and potentially win, whether he had the support of the party establishment or not. When the 2010 Citizens United decision created a wide-open campaign finance system, the ability of the establishment to guide and shape the nominating contest was reduced even further, because now anyone with a billionaire buddy or two can wage a strong campaign whether they have the support of party leaders or not.
That doesnt mean that those party leaders have no more influence. They can still deliver key endorsements, raise money, and help candidates move voters to the polls. But in the face of a phenomenon like Donald Trump, none of the tools at their disposal seem to mean very much. Just look at how that establishment helped Jeb Bush raised $100 million, a shock and awe campaign that was supposed to drive other candidates from the race and make Jeb the obvious nominee. Its not exactly working out as planned; in the current pollster.com average, Jeb is in third place behind Trump and Ben Carson, with an underwhelming eight percent support.
more
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2015/09/03/what-the-rncs-pathetic-loyalty-pledge-says-about-the-gop/?wpmm=1&wpisrc=nl_popns
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)voters forget and never do notice one of two parties you ever get to vote - two sizes fit all - for have fully embraced European neo-fascism for over a full year.
Good plan......??