Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TheMastersNemesis

(10,602 posts)
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 11:41 AM Sep 2015

Davis Won't Resign. Does That Mean She Will Continue Her Policies If Let Out Of Jail?

Davis will not resign. That means she is still in charge of her office technically. She is still THE supervisor of that office and her deputies are really just employees who were selected or appointed. Unless she resigns she will remain in office until her term expires. And she can run again and would likely win re election.

It is almost a sure thing that she will not be impeached or removed by the legislature because I imagine she has full support there. Besides there are reportedly other county clerks refusing to issue licenses to gays who are under the radar because no law suits have been filed.

And it looks like legislatures in red states would allow their revolting clerks do the same thing. So it appears it has a lot more to do with nullification of POTUS. The GOP only likes the laws THEY pass and pretty much say that they will support ignoring laws passed by the other party actually.

46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Davis Won't Resign. Does That Mean She Will Continue Her Policies If Let Out Of Jail? (Original Post) TheMastersNemesis Sep 2015 OP
You seem to think there is going to be some huge successful rebellion over this issue PoliticAverse Sep 2015 #1
I agree with you. Tipperary Sep 2015 #42
Frankly, IMO, the GOP wants to end the USA. The GOP wants a fractured country, regional RKP5637 Sep 2015 #2
I agree briloop Sep 2015 #7
Exactly!!! And their supporters just can't see what is occurring when they vote in those least RKP5637 Sep 2015 #10
Well said. hifiguy Sep 2015 #17
I think you are right NowSam Sep 2015 #26
Sadly I agree with this as well. Tipperary Sep 2015 #43
She is making$80,000 per year which is a good salary Gothmog Sep 2015 #3
In a city with a median family income of $34,375 she's living high on the hog LastLiberal in PalmSprings Sep 2015 #23
She won't be let out unless she complies or resigns Marrah_G Sep 2015 #4
Also, the judge has some discretion gratuitous Sep 2015 #6
At the very least he should fine her enough to negate her salary csziggy Sep 2015 #19
Any fine or loss of salary will be covered by donations from her supporters LastLiberal in PalmSprings Sep 2015 #30
I suspect that since she is being used by the religious right csziggy Sep 2015 #35
Bigots disguised as Christians have to be dragged kicking and screaming to do what's just BlueCaliDem Sep 2015 #5
Her lawyer claims if they take her name off the forms she will allow the licences to be issued. yellowcanine Sep 2015 #8
What? ProfessorGAC Sep 2015 #12
Yes she is. I suspect after a weekend in jail GAWD will "speak" to her and she will change her yellowcanine Sep 2015 #13
I am sure that the judge is properly bemused by and hifiguy Sep 2015 #18
Yeah, I am thinking more a dim bulb than a righteous crusader. smirkymonkey Sep 2015 #21
He also says a license issued without Davis's consent is "null and void" LastLiberal in PalmSprings Sep 2015 #32
Yeah well, he is not much of a lawyer imo. yellowcanine Sep 2015 #38
The lawyer for the county apparently expressed the opinion that they are valid. PoliticAverse Sep 2015 #45
According to articles, the ones issued Friday.. pinstikfartherin Sep 2015 #39
She is on shaky legal ground and getting bad legal advice. yellowcanine Sep 2015 #40
Ultimately, the government has to enforce the law. Jerry442 Sep 2015 #9
Same here, that was probably the best way to have solved the Cliven Bundy situation, which RKP5637 Sep 2015 #11
That's why the judge is NOT going to let her out of the slammer anytime soon. hifiguy Sep 2015 #14
Hold her until her term expires. Problem solved. JoePhilly Sep 2015 #15
She will sit there untill she is not in contempt of the laws of America. Sunlei Sep 2015 #16
Long weekend in a cell coming up for her. LanternWaste Sep 2015 #20
That's what the judge is thinking. backscatter712 Sep 2015 #22
May I ask why this woman hasn't been fired for not doing her job? CTyankee Sep 2015 #24
Because she was elected PeaceNikki Sep 2015 #25
Ah, thanks, I missed that. But I find it a bit strange...I guess we don't do that in CT. CTyankee Sep 2015 #27
We do here in WI. Many will remember Waukesha County Clerk Kathy Nickolaus from our Supreme Court PeaceNikki Sep 2015 #29
Is this a county election? If so, I know the reason we don't do this here... CTyankee Sep 2015 #31
The taxpayers, I should think, would get sick and tired of paying salaries for bums who get locked MADem Sep 2015 #28
. libodem Sep 2015 #33
When she loses her appeal, she can stay in jail for the underthematrix Sep 2015 #34
i presume she will be instructed to abide by the law or go back to jail. spanone Sep 2015 #36
This shows the idiocy of having so many elected positions. former9thward Sep 2015 #37
I agree with this ShrimpPoboy Sep 2015 #41
She shouldn't get out of jail until she agrees to follow the law. Motown_Johnny Sep 2015 #44
He's not playin yuiyoshida Sep 2015 #46

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
1. You seem to think there is going to be some huge successful rebellion over this issue
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 11:46 AM
Sep 2015

but that isn't going to happen. Just like it didn't happen over interracial marriage, and there
was a lot more negative reaction over that.

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)
2. Frankly, IMO, the GOP wants to end the USA. The GOP wants a fractured country, regional
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 11:49 AM
Sep 2015

territories and shoot-outs like in the Old West. In my lifetime the GOP has gone from a party one could respect for having good views and working together to unify the country, and now the GOP is a herd of desperadoes.

Many in the GOP are outright delusional. Now, they would like clerks to choose and pick what they agree with and block the rest.

IMO these are very dangerous times in the USA, with respect to the future of the USA. IMO, 2016 will be a fork in the road into oblivion or a united country.

 

briloop

(17 posts)
7. I agree
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 12:03 PM
Sep 2015

I can't say I'm an expert on political history, but, it's my understanding the GOP wasn't like this until Nixon decided to use his "Southern strategy" to run for President. The GOP then became more radical in the late 70's when they went after Jimmy Carter.

The GOP is basically owned by the 1%. The GOP knows it can't win elections with 1% of the vote, so they donate money to shills to run for political office. The shills use wedge issues, like abortion and gay rights, to get people (the dupes) to vote for them. Once the shills get enough dupes to vote them into office, the shills do the bidding of their benefactors.

You will see Scott Walker, Ben Carson, and others espouse a lot of dangerous rhetoric in order to stir up anger, hate, and fear in the Republican primary voter base. They count on that emotion to drive the base to vote for them. But if Walker, Carson or whoever gets into office, you can pretty much take it to the bank that their agenda won't be driven by wedge issues. Their agenda will be handed to them by the 1%.

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)
10. Exactly!!! And their supporters just can't see what is occurring when they vote in those least
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 12:22 PM
Sep 2015

likely to serve them in the voters' best interests. Yes, it certainly appears it started with the "Southern Strategy." IMO Jerry Falwell, also propelled it forward as founder of the "Moral Majority."

The GOP IMO has successfully perhaps tapped into the brains of voters with a larger amygdala and a smaller anterior cingulate than other people and hence rational logic fails for them to see the entire picture as they are consumed with fear, and fear messaging works quite well.

Hence, as you quite well say, the 1% strangleholds this nation while the enabling voters falsely believing they are voting for a true democracy and freedom.

Welcome to DU!!!!

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
17. Well said.
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 03:12 PM
Sep 2015

Zombie King Raygun was the first repuke to use the wedge issues to rile up the animals for the election, then focus solely on pleasing the MIC and the plutocrats once he was in office. Twas ever thus.

23. In a city with a median family income of $34,375 she's living high on the hog
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 04:19 PM
Sep 2015

At $80,0000 she falls in the top 20% income of the population of 6,900.

She'll hang on to her job no matter what, and count on the judge blinking or being overturned. In the meantime her martyr status increases in value, and I see a book and speaking tour in her future.

The thing is she's not the only one who's refusing to issue licenses to gay couples. Rachel Maddow said a total of 17 county clerks nationwide are doing the same thing. Legal action against the other clerks is probably on hold until this case is resolved..

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
6. Also, the judge has some discretion
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 11:57 AM
Sep 2015

Judge Bunning could start fining Mrs. Davis for each day she refuses to comply with the court's order.

I think Mrs. Davis will soon find out that the reality of being jailed for Jesus doesn't quite match the romantic ideal she may have. If she's given a Bible in stir I strongly recommend to her attention Amos 5:18-27.

csziggy

(34,138 posts)
19. At the very least he should fine her enough to negate her salary
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 03:15 PM
Sep 2015

I bet he could even freeze her salary so the county is not paying Kim Davis for sitting in jail and not providing services to Rowan County's taxpayers.

30. Any fine or loss of salary will be covered by donations from her supporters
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 04:35 PM
Sep 2015

We saw that happen with a bakery and a pizza place that refused to serve gays. That's why the judge gave her jail time rather than a fine. Although if it were legal I would imagine she could find a "designated prisoner" to take her place in the cell.

Meanwhile, it's great to see her name in the Carter County Detention Center inmate list (page 2).

csziggy

(34,138 posts)
35. I suspect that since she is being used by the religious right
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 06:05 PM
Sep 2015

Her "supporters" will end up using up all the donations. That law firm isn't going to represent her pro bono - they will suck up a huge amount of money. Franklin Graham is not assisting in setting up a donation link just to benefit Kim Davis - he'll benefit mightily from the publicity surrounding her.

I think the powers that be on that side in this fight are happy with Kim Davis as their pawn. She and her husband will be lucky to come out of this with a roof over their heads. I think they are not clever enough to make a profit for themselves. I believe that they are deluded into thinking they are doing their god's will and that he will watch out for them - and the PTB are happy to make political points and a fortune off their delusions.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
5. Bigots disguised as Christians have to be dragged kicking and screaming to do what's just
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 11:56 AM
Sep 2015

and fair. And they'll only go as far as to acquiesce, but they'll never accept what they don't like, even if it's for the greater good. Bigots gonna "bigot". They can't help themselves.

But the law is the law, and as more and more are thrown in jail for contempt of court, they'll eventually go silent...and that's why we need a Democrat in the White House all the time. Federal judges are appointed by the president, and it's incumbent upon us to ensure that the president who appoints any new judges will be a Democratic president. We need Democratic-appointed judges and justices to counter RW governors and legislatures who hate the Federal Gov't and who strive to destroy it in order to revert power back to States so they can discriminate and deny civil rights to anyone they don't approve of.

yellowcanine

(35,701 posts)
8. Her lawyer claims if they take her name off the forms she will allow the licences to be issued.
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 12:11 PM
Sep 2015

I think Kentucky should call her bluff and do it.

ProfessorGAC

(65,227 posts)
12. What?
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 12:33 PM
Sep 2015

She's in jail for contempt of court and she think she is the one who gets to set conditions?

What a dullard.

yellowcanine

(35,701 posts)
13. Yes she is. I suspect after a weekend in jail GAWD will "speak" to her and she will change her
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 02:09 PM
Sep 2015

tune. Then she can take her martyr wagon on the road and become rich whooping it up with the Christian Taliban.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
18. I am sure that the judge is properly bemused by and
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 03:14 PM
Sep 2015

quietly contemptuous of this silly shit. Judges have no sense of humor when it comes to being jerked around by idiots like this.

32. He also says a license issued without Davis's consent is "null and void"
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 04:42 PM
Sep 2015

With Ky. Clerk in Jail, Gay Couples Receive Marriage Licenses -- USA Today

yellowcanine

(35,701 posts)
38. Yeah well, he is not much of a lawyer imo.
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 02:25 PM
Sep 2015

Davis should sue him for malpractice. He gave her shitty advice. Apparently the licences which were issued actually did not have her name on it anyway. So according to the lawyer, she is sitting in jail for no reason.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
45. The lawyer for the county apparently expressed the opinion that they are valid.
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 09:47 PM
Sep 2015
Rowan County Attorney Cecil Watkins previously dismissed that argument, saying deputy clerks can issue valid marriage licenses without their boss's approval.

From: http://www.kentucky.com/2015/09/04/4019876_live-updates-county-clerk-continues.html

pinstikfartherin

(500 posts)
39. According to articles, the ones issued Friday..
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 05:11 PM
Sep 2015

do not have her name on it. She's claiming they are invalid.

So what now? IMO, if she's claiming the ones without her name are invalid, this goes beyond religious rights and turns into using her position for discrimination. If they don't have her name on them, she should just defer to the law, courts, etc, to decide whether they are valid or not and keep her mouth shut. It's not her place to decide whether they are valid or not if they do not have her name on it. She's wanting to control that office using her religious beliefs.

yellowcanine

(35,701 posts)
40. She is on shaky legal ground and getting bad legal advice.
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 06:28 PM
Sep 2015

She could end up with a lot worse problems than contempt of court. She has been collecting a salary without fulfilling some of the sworn duties of the office. That is fraud.

Jerry442

(1,265 posts)
9. Ultimately, the government has to enforce the law.
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 12:13 PM
Sep 2015

Granted, there are lots of places where federal law is flouted under the radar -- no doubt there are a bunch of public schools in the U.S. where there is regular prayer and other religious observations. If the defiance of the law becomes public and high-profile, then the government (whether local, state, or federal) has to use force of some kind, lest the country degenerate into a Somalia with rules set by local warlords.

That said, I'm glad that Obama didn't go into the Cliven Bundy situation bloodthirsty and triggerhappy, but I have a bad feeling that that situation was never resolved in any sense and is going to heat up again in a major way somewhere, someday.

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)
11. Same here, that was probably the best way to have solved the Cliven Bundy situation, which
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 12:27 PM
Sep 2015

will likely never be fully resolved. And you say,

"... I have a bad feeling that that situation was never resolved in any sense and is going to heat up again in a major way somewhere, someday."
 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
14. That's why the judge is NOT going to let her out of the slammer anytime soon.
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 03:10 PM
Sep 2015

And he could very easily issue an order to the deputy clerks to comply with the law. Which more or less seems to be what he did, more informally, yesterday.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
20. Long weekend in a cell coming up for her.
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 03:20 PM
Sep 2015

Long weekend in a cell coming up for her, allowing her precious time to reflect on her denial of rights to others, while her Liberty Council lawyer sips mint julips (tax deductible, of course) in his Virginia backyard giggling at how incredibly easy it is to dupe-for-profit.

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
22. That's what the judge is thinking.
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 03:24 PM
Sep 2015

He's giving her specific orders to process marriages, including same-sex marriages, and to allow her employees to do it, and asking her straight up if she will comply with the court's orders. Since she said no, she's in jail.

So if she doesn't pull her head out of her ass, she'll stay in jail. If she gets let out, and goes back to illegally denying same-sex couples the right to marry, the judge will hold her in contempt and lock her up again.

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
29. We do here in WI. Many will remember Waukesha County Clerk Kathy Nickolaus from our Supreme Court
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 04:32 PM
Sep 2015

Race a few years ago.

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
31. Is this a county election? If so, I know the reason we don't do this here...
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 04:37 PM
Sep 2015

While we have counties, we don't have county government. It was once explained to me but that was a long time ago and frankly, I forgot it...

MADem

(135,425 posts)
28. The taxpayers, I should think, would get sick and tired of paying salaries for bums who get locked
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 04:32 PM
Sep 2015

up in jail for not doing their jobs.

She needs to tender her resignation.

People are cheap--they don't want to see their taxes go up over bone-headed, wrong-headed principle!

former9thward

(32,093 posts)
37. This shows the idiocy of having so many elected positions.
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 06:31 PM
Sep 2015

A county clerk should not be elected. It is an administrative position. Anything administrative should be hired or appointed. We have way too many elected jobs in this country. The only positions elected should be policy making positions.

ShrimpPoboy

(301 posts)
41. I agree with this
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 06:42 PM
Sep 2015

I deal with clerk of court offices on a near daily basis and I've yet to see anything other than paper pushing. There's no reason for that to be an elected position. A competent manager is all that's needed.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
44. She shouldn't get out of jail until she agrees to follow the law.
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 06:47 PM
Sep 2015

Last edited Mon Sep 7, 2015, 09:47 AM - Edit history (1)

But if she does, I bet some other county officials just change what her duties are and leave her in a basement office somewhere until the next election.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Davis Won't Resign. Does...