Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe GOP’s rich, white “majority”: New research shows how Republicans stifle the vote & distort Ameri
The GOPs rich, white majority: New research shows how Republicans stifle the vote & distort American democracyby Sean McElwee at Salon
http://www.salon.com/2015/09/16/the_gops_rich_white_majority_new_research_shows_how_republicans_stifle_the_vote_distort_american_democracy/
"SNIP...............
Political scientist Larry Sabato once said, Every election is determined by the people who show up. Though the quote is at first blush rather banal, it carries profound implications for American democracy. In my latest report for Demos, Why Voting Matters, I argue that who votes has profound implications for policy. I argue further that contrary to the view espoused by many political scientists, voters are not a carbon copy of the electorate, but rather older, whiter and richer and therefore more conservative.
Who votes? Using data from the 2014 midterm, I find that there are large class and age gaps in voter turnout. To take one jarring statistic, while 52 percent of those earning above $150,000 voted, only 1 in 4 of those earning less than $10,000 did. Class gaps are magnified by age gaps. Among 18-24 year olds earning less than $30,000 turnout was 17 percent in 2014, but among those earning more than $150,000 and older than 65, the turnout rate was nearly four times higher, at 65 percent.
...........
A recent study by political scientists Ryan Enos, Anthony Fowler and Lynn Vavreck examines how propensity to vote correlates with policy views. They find that a one standard deviation increase in the propensity to vote (15 percentage point change in the chances of voting) is correlated with a $6,000 increase in family income, a 3 point increase in support for G.W. Bush, a 4 point decrease in support for a higher minimum wage, a 2 point decrease in support for affirmative action, a 2 point decrease in support for federal housing assistance. All of these are statistically significant, and strongly suggest that on many key issues voters are more conservative than non-voters.
............
However, not all Republicans supported the proposal to make the vote easier. Ronald Reagan wrote that it would invite wholesale election fraud, restrict effective challenges to incumbents and render the Republican Party as dead as the Dodo bird. As it happens, none of his claims were true then, and none are true today. Evidence of voter fraud is vanishingly slim, and Carters proposal actually pushed for measures to reduce fraud. Research shows higher voter turnout doesnt benefit incumbents; indeed, low voter turnout entrenches them. Finally, its unlikely that voter turnout would cause an end to the two-party system. Rather, higher voter turnout would force both parties, Republican and Democrat to move more in line with the preferences of the American population at large, rather than the whiter, older and richer voting population.
.................SNIP"
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 581 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The GOP’s rich, white “majority”: New research shows how Republicans stifle the vote & distort Ameri (Original Post)
applegrove
Sep 2015
OP
hedda_foil
(16,375 posts)1. Thanks , applegrove. I think this is the real money quote.
New research Ive explored elsewhere shows that The Reagan team assembled little data on the middle- and lower-income groups as it focused intently on gathering information on the affluent. That is, Reagan used internal polling to ensure that his policies were in line with the preferences of the wealthy, not average Americans. His agenda, then, would certainly benefit if the people he ignored werent able to push him from office. There are differences in partisan affiliation between voters and nonvoters and voters, but the strongest differences are on the role of government in the economy and support for progressive causes (see chart). More voter participation would force both political parties to address deepening concerns about rising income and wealth inequality.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)2. Confirmation of something many of us have long suspected. n/t