Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

mfcorey1

(11,001 posts) Wed May 23, 2012, 06:29 AM May 2012

Et tu, Rendell? nt

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Et tu, Rendell? nt (Original Post) mfcorey1 May 2012 OP

Is there anyone left in the Democratic Party that can explain the differences in "Private Equity"? DontTreadOnMe May 2012 #1

It's Keeping Bain's Name In The News... KharmaTrain May 2012 #2

DontTreadOnMe

(2,442 posts)

1. Is there anyone left in the Democratic Party that can explain the differences in "Private Equity"?

Reply to mfcorey1 (Original post)

Wed May 23, 2012, 07:00 AM

May 2012

You know.. like the difference between the vampire firms and the regular firms?

KharmaTrain

(31,706 posts)

2. It's Keeping Bain's Name In The News...

Reply to mfcorey1 (Original post)

Wed May 23, 2012, 07:06 AM

May 2012

This game is being played in Mittens end...he's on the defensive and the more we hear and learn about Bain the more it will hurt him. This almost feels like a Rovian game played by Axelrod and Plouffe...they're turning Mitten's biggest "asset" into a liability. If Willard is relying on using surrogates like Rattner, Rendell and Booker to plead his case, he's not only walked into a trap, he's massively stupid. Every time they asked these people to clarify what they meant, they go right after Willard's role at Bain and the difference between Venture Captial and Vulture Capital.

Reply to this discussion