General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA Facebook post from a British translator residing in Japan, re: health care
As a Japanese-English translator, I am Facebook friends with a lot of translators from around the world, including several Westerners who live in Japan permanently, often as the current or former spouse of a Japanese person or as an employee of a Japanese company.
One of Japan's health problems is a high rate of stomach cancer. There are various theories about why this is true, but it's a sad fact.
Well, this translator told about seeing an announcement from her municipal government about screenings for stomach cancer. So she went and had the tests at the announced location. The cost? Four hundred yen, which is the price of a fancy drink at a Japanese Starbucks. I don't know if this kind of thing happens everywhere in Japan, but it was a special event in her town.
The British people on her friends' list were envious, too, because apparently, they have to be referred for such screenings by their G.P.
Now Japanese health care is not necessarily cheap, since the co-pays can be high. Still, it has two features that I wish the U.S. would emulate if a full single payer program were not feasible. One is that there are no deductibles. Whether you have private insurance (usually through your employer) or "public option" insurance, you have co-pays for routine and emergency care, but no deductibles, and if your deductibles add up to more than a certain amount, the government gives you a refund. The other is that the government pays for catastrophic and chronic conditions.
I know one translator who went to Japan as a young man and was diagnosed with a heart condition while he was over there. Until the ACA, this made him uninsurable in the U.S. Even though he would now be insurable, he has lived most of his life in Japan, so it's "home," and he's over 50, which would make his insurance expensive, and unlike the U.S., his heart condition is one that the government covers fully.
A few years ago, I visited a physical rehabilitation hospital on the grounds of a health careers university in northern Japan where a friend teaches. It was a pleasant, comfortable-looking place, and I asked who pays for the patients' care. The answer: Most of the people here are covered by the government's catastrophic care program.
The U.S. can really be pathetic at times. Even when preventive and diagnostic care is free, people are afraid to get it because the cost of the treatment after deductibles scares them.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Whether Clinton or some other republican gets elected, the cost will go up and so will the profits for Big Insurance and PHARMA
Skittles
(153,174 posts)yup
spinbaby
(15,090 posts)A Japanese lady I knew who lived in the Pittsburgh area needed some major dental work and went back to Japan to have it done--partly because it was cheaper and partly because she trusted the dentist at home more. She said the savings on the dental work more than paid for her flight.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)But even then, it's still less than $11
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)Chest x Ray, blood tests and Doctor consultation were around 60 dollars. The prescription doubled the fee to a grand total of 120. Well worth it for me and unimaginable in the USA. Bonus both the doctor and pharmacists spoke English and seemed to enjoy practicing it. I think the care was superior to what I get from my clinic back in SF.
Straw Man
(6,625 posts)I lived in Japan for eight years and had the public health insurance. Monthly premiums were tied to income, and at the higher levels were comparable to private health insurance in the US. This was in the 1990s -- I don't know if it's different now.
Also, seeing a doctor at a public clinic could be a very time-consuming affair. There were no appointments, so it was strictly a take-a-number cattle-call. It was not unusual to spend several hours in the waiting room. The good news is that employers understood this, so it was completely acceptable to take a day off from work for a doctor visit.
All that said, the quality of care that I received was generally quite high.
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)unless you have what they call an orphan disease in which case the local government will pay the co pay. Overall costs as much lower. It's unlikely many Japanese are bankrupted by the medical system, certainly many less than in the USA. They also don't have trial lawyers feeding at the trough. There is personal liability but there is also an assumption of common sense from the citizenry.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Good luck getting the AMA to sign on to that...
Recursion
(56,582 posts)And price controls by the government.
Yet another reminder that single payer is not the only way to make universal health care work.