General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsManning's former supervisor: "I should have known"
Nov 08
... In 2009, Showman .. was tasked with controlling security clearances for her unit and keeping secure facilities safe. She tells Pelley that even before the unit deployed to Iraq, she had grave concerns about Manning. His behavior was erratic, she says, and he told her he had "no allegiance" to America. But when she tried to alert her superiors, she says, she was told they couldn't afford to lose someone with a valuable top-secret clearance.
In Iraq, Manning was prone to fits of rage, Showman says, even punching her at one point. She says she also saw him bring CDs and a camera into a high-security intelligence vault, where classified material was kept. Over eight months, Manning used the CDs to record hundreds of thousands of secrets, delivering them to the website WikiLeaks ...
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/chelsea-manning-former-supervisor-i-should-have-known/
struggle4progress
(118,320 posts)By Bradford Richardson
11/08/15 07:00 PM EST
... During a 60 Minutes episode airing Sunday night, multiple officials pointed to several high-profile cases in which personnel should not have been granted security clearances, citing the cases of fugitive Edward Snowden, convicted spy Bradley Manning and mass murderer Aaron Alexis.
Aaron Alexis should never have been granted a security clearance, former Assistant to the Secretary of Defense Paul Stockton said.
Stockton said Alexis, who murdered 12 of his colleagues in the 2013 Washington Navy Yard shooting, had a violent history that should have disqualified him from his post.
That kind of violent behavior, that problem of impulse control, that should have been a prime signal this person is not, repeat, is not appropriate to have the trust associated with a security clearance, Stockton said ...
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/259505-former-officials-process-for-granting-security-clearances-broken
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Even for people who... wait for it... have been overseas on orders: they check up on literally everyone you had any social contact with. They do this before they run a criminal record or credit check. It's absolutely asinine.
(I'm strongly against credit checks for 90% of jobs, but a TS-cleared position seems like one that really needs one, and they should probably do that first. As it is, they run the background contact check and even grant an interim clearance before they run a $*ing simple credit check.)
MADem
(135,425 posts)They were so desperate to have a butt on the bus (or the plane) w/a clearance, they took the ticking time bomb with them.
And had the clearance been properly executed, they would have found Manning was a poor candidate for one in the first place, due to fits of rage.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)"Do you have any allegiance to the United States?" is a pretty big one, though.
MADem
(135,425 posts)in the towns where he lived--he had to put all of his addresses for the last ten years on the SF-86. There was a 911 call on file by his stepmother, asking for help because he was having "fits of rage." He threatened her with a knife. You can hear the 911 call at this link:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/wikileaks/bradley-manning/bradley-manning-911-call/
Years later, Bradley would claim he was kicked out of the house for being gay, but his father tells a different story. Bradley had become increasingly erratic at work and lost his job at a software company after a heated confrontation with his boss.
At home, the tensions reached a boiling point. In March 2006, a family argument became violent -- Bradley allegedly threatened his stepmother with a knife -- and police were called to the Manning home.
His initial enlistment documents --that plainly, no one looked at, said he joined the military to unscrew up his screwed up life, in essence. He was a low-quality recruit, and he should not have been accessed, nor should he have been given ANY sort of clearance at all.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)And by the time they do them, there's so much pressure from the staffed agency that it's difficult to withdraw the interim.
MADem
(135,425 posts)And I think they should just bite the bullet and do it right. Nothing higher than confidential until the shit clears.
I can't tell you how many times I've been put on that damn form as a "reference" and had the tag team show up to ask me if I remembered if so-and-so was a boozer or spent money like a (pardon the pun) drunken sailor, or fooled around, or what-have-you.
That Walker mess was not all that long ago, big picture--have we learned nothing?
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)None!
I submitted the SF-86 and it was back in like 40 days.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)That's... insane.
MADem
(135,425 posts)You've got to wonder how that joint was run. Bringing anything in--or out--of that place should have been the Drill From Hell if they were doing it right.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)The clearance never should have been issued. The units security manager should have revoked the clearnace based on behavior and statements.
And no way in hell he should should have been able to carry cameras and recordable media into the work space.