Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,996 posts)
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 11:57 AM Nov 2015

This is not my war, this is not our war. This is your war.

They are ours who died last night.

On the terrace of a restaurant, in a bar, on the street, in a concert hall.

Ours.

Died because murderers have decided to strike right in Paris and shoot into the crowd, with the aim of making the most possible victims.

11:30. Sarkozy has just declared: "We are at war."

For once I agree with him. They are at war.

You are at war, you Sarkozy, Hollande, Valls, Cameron, Netanyahu, Obama. You are at war, you and your political allies, you and your friends multinational bosses.



And if we want it all stops, it will have once the shock wore off, do everything to stop this headlong rush towards generalized barbarism.

It's not too late. There is still time to move on. Radically.

By refusing the injunction "with us or with the terrorists".

By refusing calls for unity with the torturers and warmongers who build every day a barbaric world.

By denying world based on exploitation, theft, violence, injustice, inequality, the tendering of those who should unite.

Fight for another world that is not only possible but more necessary than ever.

Stay the course and concede nothing under the pressure of emotion or consideration.

You'll be able to tax me naïve if you want. But my idealism has never killed anyone. Unlike your "pragmatism".

It is more than ever time to "resist the irresistible".

So, no, Cambadélis. No, Sarkozy. No, Holland. "We" are not at war.

This is not my war, this is not our war. This is your war.

And once again, these are our dead. As in Madrid in 2004 and London in 2005, as in Egypt there are fifteen days as in Beirut this week.

And like everywhere you sow terror.

Your war, our dead.

Your wars, no more
.


translated from french:
http://resisteralairdutemps.blogspot.fr/2015/11/vos-guerres-nos-morts.html

?1447514268
103 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This is not my war, this is not our war. This is your war. (Original Post) kpete Nov 2015 OP
Nope, it's definitely war. MohRokTah Nov 2015 #1
"They" kpete Nov 2015 #2
Yes, Islamic State. They started it. MohRokTah Nov 2015 #3
Yes, sure they will. Tipperary Nov 2015 #8
yeah, the coalition can go into the ME, bomb the hell out of the ISIS forces they can find, Still In Wisconsin Nov 2015 #16
You signing up? bvar22 Nov 2015 #18
I have no kids. MohRokTah Nov 2015 #19
Way to shut them up, MohRokTah ConservativeDemocrat Nov 2015 #37
No, but I DO believe that people who beat WAR DRUMS should be willing to bvar22 Nov 2015 #59
Perhaps because you are not affected? randome Nov 2015 #88
An absurd and not very intelligent infrence from my post. bvar22 Nov 2015 #89
If someone is attacking your neighborhood and is drawing near your house, would you act then? randome Nov 2015 #97
actually, cheney and his pnac ilk started it restorefreedom Nov 2015 #22
Bush started it malaise Nov 2015 #32
bush's name might be attached to it restorefreedom Nov 2015 #35
According to the Constiution of the United States, those who voted for the IWR started it. merrily Nov 2015 #56
The ME has been a tribal slaughterhouse for a thousand years. hifiguy Nov 2015 #93
yes, a long time cauldron for sure restorefreedom Nov 2015 #96
. merrily Nov 2015 #26
It's their war malaise Nov 2015 #33
Was Reply 33 intended to reply to the OP? merrily Nov 2015 #50
The Cold War had just ended and George H. W. Bush needed a new enemy cpwm17 Nov 2015 #54
I saw 3 Presidents and a then United States Senator in that post. Please see also Reply 56. merrily Nov 2015 #57
I know that. cpwm17 Nov 2015 #60
it started with the Brits and French. Arabs like the Brits better than us, though. merrily Nov 2015 #63
"must be crushed with global military might" Wilms Nov 2015 #4
All France need do is invoke the NATO charter. MohRokTah Nov 2015 #5
sorry - clueless SoLeftIAmRight Nov 2015 #6
Tend to agree ... ananda Nov 2015 #14
WE'VE been at war continuously since 2002 in the Middle east dixiegrrrrl Nov 2015 #11
so very sad SoLeftIAmRight Nov 2015 #17
and they did not win WW2 either malaise Nov 2015 #34
George HW Bush actually started the Iraq War in 1991. bvar22 Nov 2015 #38
That says nothing with respect to success. morningfog Nov 2015 #23
Oh, goody! Here's hoping, huh? Can't wait! merrily Nov 2015 #30
NOW I understand you loving Hillary!!! nt Logical Nov 2015 #69
Makes you all tingly, hunh? Hissyspit Nov 2015 #98
So 14 years of war against Al Qaeda and what's the result? nt CJCRANE Nov 2015 #7
ISIS took over and what's left of Al-Qaeda are working with moderate rebels to bring down Assad killbotfactory Nov 2015 #10
Show us how this strategy has worked for us? tecelote Nov 2015 #13
Diplomacy with ISIS? EL34x4 Nov 2015 #20
Not diplomacy with IS, obviously.e morningfog Nov 2015 #24
You think they don't have sufficient incentive to eradicate IS? muriel_volestrangler Nov 2015 #76
No agreement. tecelote Nov 2015 #29
What is your solution? We already know wars only made things worse. merrily Nov 2015 #31
First, we accept that ISIS does not want to live in harmony with the West EL34x4 Nov 2015 #40
BS. That has been accepted since we first heard of Isis. No productive or "proper" response so far. merrily Nov 2015 #42
OK. Just realize that while the Left EL34x4 Nov 2015 #52
The left? Are you with the right? Is identifying me as the left and using the RW Kumbayah cliche merrily Nov 2015 #61
Here's the reality: EL34x4 Nov 2015 #64
Question is, what do we do about it that will be effective, or at least not make things worse, as merrily Nov 2015 #70
Simple EL34x4 Nov 2015 #71
Thought so. You seem unable and/or unwilling to grasp that war has only made it worse for us. merrily Nov 2015 #72
Half-assed police actions EL34x4 Nov 2015 #73
So what kind of war did you have in mind--oh, and against whom? Every nation in the Middle East? merrily Nov 2015 #74
You don't have a solution? EL34x4 Nov 2015 #75
You don't want to tell me what kind of war (and against whom) you think IS the solution? merrily Nov 2015 #77
Crickets from the proponent of warfare. Octafish Nov 2015 #55
Like military might crushed the Viet Cong in the '50s, '60s, and '70s? 1monster Nov 2015 #25
"One thing that is sure, by reacting with violence, the situation is not calmed, " < This. But jtuck004 Nov 2015 #53
You're enlisting, then? Scootaloo Nov 2015 #51
I already served. MohRokTah Nov 2015 #78
Go freelance. You want to kill, there's always someone hiring. Scootaloo Nov 2015 #79
No contractor organization would have me at my age. eom MohRokTah Nov 2015 #80
George Bush, is that you?? nt Logical Nov 2015 #66
Dude, you need pizza so bad. PowerToThePeople Nov 2015 #94
The more 20-year-old men sign up for war, the more war there is. valerief Nov 2015 #9
20 year old men are just doing what they do. Seeking opportunity and finding it not in the "market" Ed Suspicious Nov 2015 #45
^^^this, exactly. Religion is not the cause of this. magical thyme Nov 2015 #48
^^^ Not this, not in the least. Religion is the prime driver of this. muriel_volestrangler Nov 2015 #81
I know that. Shipping jobs overseas leaves them more desperate and steers them valerief Nov 2015 #49
K&R! tecelote Nov 2015 #12
Wars do not work? EL34x4 Nov 2015 #62
Current wars. tecelote Nov 2015 #68
This - ISIS IS NOT A COUNTRY. Blue_In_AK Nov 2015 #83
Did I say we should use WWII methods? tecelote Nov 2015 #84
No, of course not. Blue_In_AK Nov 2015 #85
Ah! tecelote Nov 2015 #86
That is very, very well said, Blue_In_AK Nov 2015 #87
K and R to the nth. salib Nov 2015 #15
Okay, just send ISIS an edible bouquet and hug it out. Problem solved nt geek tragedy Nov 2015 #21
Lets blow the arms of your friends and family's children and see which side it is that your come Ed Suspicious Nov 2015 #46
ISIS is not a resistance movement nor is it primarily geek tragedy Nov 2015 #67
Besides Empire, the other…. zentrum Nov 2015 #27
Stieglitz is a brilliant man. I assume that he is referring to jwirr Nov 2015 #41
Yes, USA at the moment. zentrum Nov 2015 #90
I think of it as our right wing vs their right wing. Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2015 #28
Well said. K&R Tierra_y_Libertad Nov 2015 #36
Just be careful what cafe you sit in to write this stuff. n/t jtuck004 Nov 2015 #39
Yeah? You scared to walk down to Starbucks? Get your head checked. Ed Suspicious Nov 2015 #47
I'm not scared at all, certainly not of childish insults. But it is our war, and all the drivel jtuck004 Nov 2015 #58
That's what they said in Sydney .... TheFarS1de Nov 2015 #91
I'm not in a bubble. I just don't feel it necessary to board up the windows because sometimes Ed Suspicious Nov 2015 #92
Paris just experienced a little more than a stiff breeze . TheFarS1de Nov 2015 #101
I don't deny terrorism at coffee houses exists. I do remain less afraid of the possibility of death Ed Suspicious Nov 2015 #102
+1, we really need to chill dreamnightwind Nov 2015 #103
For some reason I'm reminded of John Donne's poem, No Man Is An Island, and feel led to post it here classof56 Nov 2015 #43
Some sanity. Thank you. Rec'd n/t Catherina Nov 2015 #44
and that is *HIS* opinion... Blue_Tires Nov 2015 #65
Once again, kpete has provided food for serious thought PatrickforO Nov 2015 #82
So if the West just leaves ISIS alone, we'll have peace just like that?? Blue_Tires Nov 2015 #99
OK. Let's try a different tack. PatrickforO Nov 2015 #100
US Soldiers 6,850 Dead 900,000 Injured B Calm Nov 2015 #95
 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
1. Nope, it's definitely war.
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 12:00 PM
Nov 2015

Islamic State is the enemy and it must be crushed with global military might.

There is no stopping this. They started it, the rest of the world must finish it as judiciously as possible.

 

Still In Wisconsin

(4,450 posts)
16. yeah, the coalition can go into the ME, bomb the hell out of the ISIS forces they can find,
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 01:49 PM
Nov 2015

defeat the others militarily with a huge ground offensive.... and then we will be left with what?

Another vacuum in a part of the world with plenty of nasty people ready, willing, and able to fill it.

Look, nobody is suggesting a "do nothing" approach. But to suggest that this phenomenon can or will be finished militarily is overly simplistic and quite frankly not helpful.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
18. You signing up?
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 01:57 PM
Nov 2015

How about sending your kids to fight the new crusade?
If it is your war, you should be willing to spend some blood or body parts.

ConservativeDemocrat

(2,720 posts)
37. Way to shut them up, MohRokTah
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 02:28 PM
Nov 2015

That "send your kids off to war" argument that terrorist-appeasers also always come out with is also hilariously out of date.
Apparently they still think there is some sort of Vietnam era draft going on or something.

- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
59. No, but I DO believe that people who beat WAR DRUMS should be willing to
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 03:03 PM
Nov 2015

shed their OWN blood....not some else's kid.
This is a legitimate response to those who promote more killing and destruction.
What are YOU willing to put on the table for another WAR.

I'm not willing to put ANYTHING, no family, no friends, no children, no neighbors, no money, and no blood.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
88. Perhaps because you are not affected?
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 04:58 PM
Nov 2015

[hr][font color="blue"][center]Where do uncaptured mouse clicks go?[/center][/font][hr]

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
89. An absurd and not very intelligent infrence from my post.
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 05:05 PM
Nov 2015

The REAL Reason: Because the Military Kills People and Breaks Things.
They do NOT help the locals in any form or fashion.
Everything we have done over there has made things worse...not better.


If YOU, in your arrogance, can point to anything we have done that has actually HELPED, we might have room for a conversation,
but it appears all you want to do at this point is post insults.

Cheers!

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
97. If someone is attacking your neighborhood and is drawing near your house, would you act then?
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 06:18 PM
Nov 2015

Violence never solves anything but sometimes it is the proper response. A paradox, to be sure.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Where do uncaptured mouse clicks go?[/center][/font][hr]

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
22. actually, cheney and his pnac ilk started it
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 02:02 PM
Nov 2015

their war for oil in iraq gave birth to isis.

and now the beast has been fed and unleashed.

why is that evil pustule not rotting in prison?

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
35. bush's name might be attached to it
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 02:21 PM
Nov 2015

but there is no doubt in my mind that that sniveling creature from hell cheney was behind it.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
56. According to the Constiution of the United States, those who voted for the IWR started it.
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 02:57 PM
Nov 2015

So many inconvenient truths about Iraq for both Republicans and Democrats, including during this primary season.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
93. The ME has been a tribal slaughterhouse for a thousand years.
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 05:47 PM
Nov 2015

Ever since the Shia/Sunni schism. Save for an Ottoman-imposed peace in the Turkish controlled areas during the Middle Ages various tribes of barbarians jacked up on religious idiocy have been gleefully butchering each other for a millennium for reasons ranging from the imbecilic to the completely and wholly incomprehensible.

All the US did was pour some more fuel on fires that have been burning for ten or eleven centuries.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
96. yes, a long time cauldron for sure
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 06:07 PM
Nov 2015

but cheney did come by smiling with a vat of kerosene...sick greedy prick

merrily

(45,251 posts)
26. .
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 02:11 PM
Nov 2015






Address to the Nation on the Invasion of Iraq (January 16, 1991)



George H. W. Bush


Just 2 hours ago, allied air forces began an attack on military targets in Iraq and Kuwait.
These attacks continue as I speak. Ground forces are not engaged.

This conflict started August 2d when the dictator of Iraq invaded a small and helpless neighbor. Kuwait—a member of the Arab League and a member of the United Nations—was crushed; its people, brutalized. Five months ago, Saddam Hussein started this cruel war against Kuwait. Tonight, the battle has been joined.


much more at:

http://www.millercenter.org/president/speeches/speech-3428

transcript: President Clinton explains Iraq strike

CLINTON: Good evening.

Earlier today, I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.


much more at:

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html






more at:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026211673



Senate vote on 2002 AUMF at:

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/107-2002/s237



House vote on 2002 AUMF at:

https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/107/hjres114



10:16 P.M. EST

THE PRESIDENT: My fellow citizens, at this hour, American and coalition forces are in the early stages of military operations to disarm Iraq, to free its people and to defend the world from grave danger.


On my orders, coalition forces have begun striking selected targets of military importance to undermine Saddam Hussein's ability to wage war. These are opening stages of what will be a broad and concerted campaign. More than 35 countries are giving crucial support -- from the use of naval and air bases, to help with intelligence and logistics, to the deployment of combat units. Every nation in this coalition has chosen to bear the duty and share the honor of serving in our common defense.


more at http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2003/03/20030319-17.html




 

cpwm17

(3,829 posts)
54. The Cold War had just ended and George H. W. Bush needed a new enemy
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 02:54 PM
Nov 2015

so Saddam would be it. That started this cycle of violence, which was greatly increased by George W. Bush.

If you destroy governments and support bad ones, massacre a lot of people, and a flood a region with a lot of weapons, terrible things happen.

 

cpwm17

(3,829 posts)
60. I know that.
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 03:04 PM
Nov 2015

I just mentioned the poor excuse for all of our aggressions. I think they all should be put on trial for crimes against humanity.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
63. it started with the Brits and French. Arabs like the Brits better than us, though.
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 03:11 PM
Nov 2015

They think the Brits are more civilized than we are. And, as best I can tell, they love all things French. Meanwhile, DU thinks Arabs are uncivilized.

Or, it started the first time oil was discovered in the Middle East. Or when the first American oil company started operations in the Middle East.

Or, it started when Mohammed was born.

Take your pick.

And the killing and maiming continues.

 

SoLeftIAmRight

(4,883 posts)
6. sorry - clueless
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 01:00 PM
Nov 2015

Europe was at war for hundreds of years -two really big ones - the middle east has that to look forward to. The spillover will not be pleasant but it is for them to come to terms with.

We lost our chance at peace when we elected raygun and turned away for encouraging third world development.

The blind support for Israel has just inflamed the situation.

Bottom line - bush opened Pandora's box - forces are at work that cannot be managed.

History will have to run it's course.

ananda

(28,865 posts)
14. Tend to agree ...
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 01:41 PM
Nov 2015

There will be a war now. History is out of our control.

How big of a war, that is the question.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
11. WE'VE been at war continuously since 2002 in the Middle east
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 01:38 PM
Nov 2015

with nothing to show for it except millions of innocent deaths, billions of dollars enriching those who profit from war, and millions of refugees fleeing the Middle East.
Does not even count the proxy wars in Africa.

USA has not won a war since WW2,btw.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
38. George HW Bush actually started the Iraq War in 1991.
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 02:30 PM
Nov 2015

Bill Clinton kept it at a slow boil with the incredible harsh sanctions and occasional cruise missile strikes
that killed over 1/2 MILLION innocent Iraqi CHILDREN.

Bush-the-Lesser then picked up the WAR torch and went nuts with an unmatched orgy of blood lust of killings, revenge, collective punishment, torture, executions, blood baths of innocents, and making brown people "disappear".

...AND, it is still not over.
Some signs indicate that it is just warming up.


A hundred years ago, we might have made peace with a different culture & religion,
to the benefit and betterment of both.... but that window has closed.
Even if we now withdrew every single American and European from the Middle East, we have killed so many family members, friends, and relatives that the Blood Feud won't end for another century. Those families and tribes have very long memories, and a strict code of revenge. They will NOT stop until they feel the scales are balanced. (Now THAT is scary).

All we have achieved in the Middle East is to unify the Islamic Fundamentalist Radical Militants from Libya to Turkey. A 16 year old boy who has had his family blown to pieces by a HellFire Missile
doesn't soon forget who is responsible.

It is too late to make nice now.
The best we can do is prepare to reap-the-whirlwind.

killbotfactory

(13,566 posts)
10. ISIS took over and what's left of Al-Qaeda are working with moderate rebels to bring down Assad
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 01:19 PM
Nov 2015

So, you know... progress?

tecelote

(5,122 posts)
13. Show us how this strategy has worked for us?
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 01:41 PM
Nov 2015

More war. The solution perpetuates the problem.

Time for diplomacy.

 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
24. Not diplomacy with IS, obviously.e
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 02:05 PM
Nov 2015

Diplomacy with the nations in which IS is based. They need to eradicate IS, and have an incentive to do so.

WE need good intelligence to intercept and prevent attacks.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,321 posts)
76. You think they don't have sufficient incentive to eradicate IS?
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 03:53 PM
Nov 2015

For fuck's sake, they've killed thousands of Syrians and Iraqis, and occupied significant cities and regions of those countries. IS would attack them more if they ever get the chance. They have the incentive already.

tecelote

(5,122 posts)
29. No agreement.
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 02:12 PM
Nov 2015

I'm far from anti-military but I am anti-war.

Diplomacy can include a military response. But, so far, we have just blundered around making more war which has only ended up creating more profit for our war profiteers. No humanitarian advances that I see.

You're pro-war so you must see progress I don't.

Show me how our current approach has de-escalated ISIS' effect on the world instead of strengthening their position and giving them a voice?

 

EL34x4

(2,003 posts)
40. First, we accept that ISIS does not want to live in harmony with the West
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 02:33 PM
Nov 2015

They don't want to coexist.

Their demands are very clear: A worldwide Caliphate under the boot heels of their strict version of Islam.

Once we accept this, it will become easier to formulate a proper response.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
42. BS. That has been accepted since we first heard of Isis. No productive or "proper" response so far.
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 02:35 PM
Nov 2015
 

EL34x4

(2,003 posts)
52. OK. Just realize that while the Left
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 02:52 PM
Nov 2015

looks for a productive and "proper" response to ISIS in Europe, the Right is greasing the axles of boxcars. They haven't been used in a while but they'll be ready to go. And when the time comes, don't be shocked if there's a lot of Europeans at the train stations helping to load them up.

While the Left dithers, the Right's response to ISIS will be very simple and effective. There will be no holding hands and singing Kumbayah.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
61. The left? Are you with the right? Is identifying me as the left and using the RW Kumbayah cliche
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 03:05 PM
Nov 2015

supposed to refute that Middle Eastern wars have not solved a thing, but only made things worse?

Ever see the video in which Bin Laden said he made up his mind to attack us when he saw the blood of children running in the streets of Beirut, courtesy of an attack ordered by Poppy? That's where attacking the Middle East got us. It also got us Al Qaeda Iraq, Isis and many more recruits for terrorist organizations that want to attack us.

Now, you can address that reality or say silly things about kumbayah, but it will remain the reality.

 

EL34x4

(2,003 posts)
64. Here's the reality:
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 03:14 PM
Nov 2015

Most Europeans want to be able to attend a rock concert without getting murdered. They're going to support the party that offers this.

Understanding that RW blunders in the Middle East have made a mess of the region does not put the genie back in the bottle. Now we have ISIS committing acts of atrocities on European soil. The Left had better come up with a plan to deal with this or the Right will.

All we hear from this Left right now is blame. "Bush's fault!" YES, IT WAS BUSH'S FAULT! I GET IT!

So what are we going to do about it now before fascists start winning elections?

merrily

(45,251 posts)
70. Question is, what do we do about it that will be effective, or at least not make things worse, as
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 03:25 PM
Nov 2015

war has?

So far, I have not seen your proposal.

 

EL34x4

(2,003 posts)
71. Simple
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 03:31 PM
Nov 2015

Give them a choice: Live peacefully or die and let them know that either decision is perfectly acceptable.

Worked for us the last time we won a war, which also happened to be a war where Democrats were in charge.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
72. Thought so. You seem unable and/or unwilling to grasp that war has only made it worse for us.
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 03:33 PM
Nov 2015

BTW, when was the last time we "won" a war and how many wars have we, um, not "won" since the most recent war we supposedly won?

 

EL34x4

(2,003 posts)
73. Half-assed police actions
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 03:38 PM
Nov 2015

Where we send our soldiers to prison if they punch an enemy combatant in the face does not constitute war fighting.

Anyhow, you asked for my solution. I gave it. What's yours?

merrily

(45,251 posts)
74. So what kind of war did you have in mind--oh, and against whom? Every nation in the Middle East?
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 03:41 PM
Nov 2015

Every Muslim nation? Bomb 'em all to obliviion because they're barbaric?


Anyhow, you asked for my solution. I gave it. What's yours?


I'm not the one who ruled out diplomacy or pretended to have a solution.

I know only that, so far, war has made things worse, for the West and for humankind. Oh, and all sides have the ability to wage nuclear war. Yipppeeee!
 

EL34x4

(2,003 posts)
75. You don't have a solution?
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 03:51 PM
Nov 2015

It would behoove of you to come up with one quickly before the people in Europe who do have solutions start winning elections.

Anyhow, you don't want war. You want diplomatic solutions. That's perfectly understandable. War is ugly, destructive, expensive.

So let's engage in diplomacy with ISIS. Their demands are simple; convert to Islam, implement strict Sharia law in your countries, allow enslavement of your women and children. What are you going to bring to the table?

merrily

(45,251 posts)
77. You don't want to tell me what kind of war (and against whom) you think IS the solution?
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 03:55 PM
Nov 2015

Having a solution and keeping it secret is useless. It worked temporarily for Nixon, but people soon saw that he didn't know shit from Shinola about actual solutions. But, no doubt, you do. Which should have made answering the questions in my prior post easy for you. Go ahead, give them a go.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
55. Crickets from the proponent of warfare.
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 02:57 PM
Nov 2015

Crickets as for doing anything else, too, which is really sad.

1monster

(11,012 posts)
25. Like military might crushed the Viet Cong in the '50s, '60s, and '70s?
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 02:09 PM
Nov 2015

Like military might has crushed Al Queda and the Taliban? Like military might tries to crush the Palestinians?

The last time military might won the day was in 1945. Warfare has changed and military might is as outdated as the swords used by the Light Brigade in the Crimea.

I don't have any answers. In order to have answers, one must first understand what it is IS wants. I'm not sure that they know what they want. They are acting out of rage and probably without a game plan.

One thing that is sure, by reacting with violence, the situation is not calmed, the rage and violence grows and more and more people/countries are sucked into an ever growing maelstrom that will grow to WWIII.

Someone, the other day, posted that we are already in the beginnings of WWIII and we just haven't realized it yet. I hope saner, more thoughtful minds prevail before it is undeniable. Because

"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stone." Albert Einstein

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
53. "One thing that is sure, by reacting with violence, the situation is not calmed, " < This. But
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 02:53 PM
Nov 2015

I think this >"They are acting out of rage and probably without a game plan. " < is just from our point of view, and underestimates their goals and resolve.

That's a deadly mistake for a nation which has more people moving into poverty or near poverty every day to make. It's the kind of arrogance - just because you\we don't know doesn't mean a thing. Not a thing, other than we are ignorant about something and refuse to admit it.

The groups fighting us are very well funded, thank's in part to our insatiable appetite for oil to run to McDonalds with, and they are being run by people trained in some of the finest universities in the world. Including the ones here.

Perhaps that is why we are still fighting them.

They could win. Whatever that means to them. And that may simply mean they leave nothing but a desert, devoid of life, everyone dead. Like some of our neighbors think - but that's another post.

Anyway, my point is that this makes your "calming" a much higher priority than we currently give it. And perhaps makes "winning" too scary to imagine.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
78. I already served.
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 03:57 PM
Nov 2015

I attempted to re-enlist on 9/12/01, however, they would not take me due to two screws in my leg. I looked into surgery to have the screws removed, however, the wait time plus recovery would put me too far past my birthday to be young enough to re-enlist.

Today I am far too old to re-enlist.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
79. Go freelance. You want to kill, there's always someone hiring.
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 03:59 PM
Nov 2015

Maybe one of those noble and heroic "rebel groups" in Syria will take you, hmmm?

 

PowerToThePeople

(9,610 posts)
94. Dude, you need pizza so bad.
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 05:50 PM
Nov 2015

Hello! Anybody from the admin read DU any more?

Is this what you want DU to be? This right wing, hate filled, destructive crap?

MohRokTah
1. Nope, it's definitely war.

View profile
Islamic State is the enemy and it must be crushed with global military might.

There is no stopping this. They started it, the rest of the world must finish it as judiciously as possible.



valerief

(53,235 posts)
9. The more 20-year-old men sign up for war, the more war there is.
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 01:16 PM
Nov 2015

The more defense contractors are awarded massive chunks of taxpayer money, the more war there is.

Imagine if both of these things were massively reduced.

But religion/patriotism and media lies keep them alive.

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
45. 20 year old men are just doing what they do. Seeking opportunity and finding it not in the "market"
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 02:38 PM
Nov 2015

but rather in a market approved government program. No recruiter says "Join the Army! You'll get to fight in a war!"

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
48. ^^^this, exactly. Religion is not the cause of this.
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 02:43 PM
Nov 2015

poverty, lack of opportunity, seeing your home bombed.

Today's 20 year olds were 5-6 years old during Desert Storm. Our 1% oil wars made them the monsters we see today.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,321 posts)
81. ^^^ Not this, not in the least. Religion is the prime driver of this.
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 04:02 PM
Nov 2015

That's why IS kills Yazidis, or forces them into sexual slavery. That's why they kill Shiites. That's why they kill Syrian and Iraqi Christians. They are religious fanatics who hate people who don't conform to their lunatic religious ideas, and are happy to kill over it.

That's why the IS statement have phrases like "hundreds of idolaters were together in a party of perversity" to describe the rock concert, and says France was the target because of "having dared insult our prophet, having bragged about fighting Islam in France and striking Muslims in the caliphate with their planes, which have not helped them in any way in the ill-smelling streets of Paris".

Ignoring the religious basis for IS, just like the blog the OP links to does, is so bloody stupid, that people who do it aren't worth reading. Time and again IS tells the world its motivation, and some people are determined to ignore it.

tecelote

(5,122 posts)
12. K&R!
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 01:39 PM
Nov 2015

Hasn't our current wars proven they do not work? Have we made the world a better place?

No.

We're running the longest war in US history right now, why? What have we solved?

Time for a major shift in policy. Diplomacy may not be as profitable as war but we must make the change to a peaceful solution.

 

EL34x4

(2,003 posts)
62. Wars do not work?
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 03:06 PM
Nov 2015

We haven't unleashed total war yet. Our grandfathers did, and it worked.

Germany and Japan, once every bit as fanatical as ISIS is today are now quite pleasant.

tecelote

(5,122 posts)
68. Current wars.
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 03:23 PM
Nov 2015

"Hasn't our current wars proven they do not work?"

My grandfather's WWI medals are proudly displayed.

ISIS is not a country and we are not fighting a world war.

Show me some progress?

How have we not just made them stronger and given them a voice and reason to recruit?

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
83. This - ISIS IS NOT A COUNTRY.
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 04:32 PM
Nov 2015

You can't use World War II tactics to combat a terrorist organization. There is no emperor or general with whom to negotiate a peaceful settlement.

tecelote

(5,122 posts)
84. Did I say we should use WWII methods?
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 04:38 PM
Nov 2015

I said the current methods are not working. Open to suggestions.

You think are current methods are working?

Examples?

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
85. No, of course not.
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 04:43 PM
Nov 2015

I'm not even sure it was you I was responding to. Someone in this thread said something about how nice Japan and Germany are now after we beat them into submission in 1945. My comment was intended to point out that I don't believe that tactic works with a stateless organization like ISIS. I don't know what will.

tecelote

(5,122 posts)
86. Ah!
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 04:48 PM
Nov 2015

I thought I had seen other rational responses from you in the past so I was surprised.

BTW - here is one of the better approaches I've seen - just posted by Phantom Power:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027345290

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
87. That is very, very well said,
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 04:54 PM
Nov 2015

and builds on the point that I was clumsily trying to make. And, yes, I usually try to be rational. Thanks for noticing.

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
46. Lets blow the arms of your friends and family's children and see which side it is that your come
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 02:41 PM
Nov 2015

down. Give peace a chance? Not a chance after you invaded my country and destroyed my opportunity. We see Americans teetering on voting for fascists in the R party. We haven't even faced an occupying army.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
67. ISIS is not a resistance movement nor is it primarily
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 03:18 PM
Nov 2015

interested in redressing the grievances of the past two centuries.

They are theocratic imperialists.

zentrum

(9,865 posts)
27. Besides Empire, the other….
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 02:11 PM
Nov 2015

…..thing I've read about the situation in Syria is that because global warming (i.e.the fossil-fuel military industrial military complex) caused so much crop failure that ordinary Syrians couldn't afford bread anymore. Hence civil war, civil unrest and the chasm into which rushed all the disaffected parties.

I think this was Joseph Stieglitz's analysis: global warming combined with the oppressions of Empire opens the door to starvation, refugee crisis and extremism of every kind.

What a mess.

zentrum

(9,865 posts)
90. Yes, USA at the moment.
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 05:30 PM
Nov 2015

But Europe has long Colonial tentacles all over the ME and Africa. It's the West messing in the ME.

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
58. I'm not scared at all, certainly not of childish insults. But it is our war, and all the drivel
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 03:02 PM
Nov 2015

suggesting it isn't is disingenuous. We started it a long, long time ago. And we are going to keep it alive, and re-gift it to our children.

I want to hear from the family of the security guard who saved a lot of folks by stopping a suicide bomber.

Idiots that say this isn't everyone's problem are dangerous. They get innocent people who may not know better killed.

We can and should respond with our heads, breaking with our long-standing traditions. Doubt that will happen, and you provide me with proof.



Thank you for the support, and the heads-up. Bye.





TheFarS1de

(1,017 posts)
91. That's what they said in Sydney ....
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 05:39 PM
Nov 2015

Heard of the Lindt Café ? Enjoy the illusion of being in an immunity bubble .

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
92. I'm not in a bubble. I just don't feel it necessary to board up the windows because sometimes
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 05:42 PM
Nov 2015

it's windy.

TheFarS1de

(1,017 posts)
101. Paris just experienced a little more than a stiff breeze .
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 05:44 AM
Nov 2015

Way to belittle the situation . They were killed for simply being . If this won't make people pay attention then nothing ever will ... until one day your sitting down for a coffee and happen to run into an individual with an institutionalized hatred of anything different .

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
102. I don't deny terrorism at coffee houses exists. I do remain less afraid of the possibility of death
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 06:02 AM
Nov 2015

by terrorist than I am of death by earthquake. I was largely unafraid of the such an inevitability three days ago. I remain largely unafraid today. I'm not belittling the situation. I'm saying the situation is a statistical anomaly. I'm not about to begin to avoid my local coffee house for fear of ideological extremism. Living at orange, at threat level elevated just really doesn't do much good for anybody.

classof56

(5,376 posts)
43. For some reason I'm reminded of John Donne's poem, No Man Is An Island, and feel led to post it here
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 02:38 PM
Nov 2015

Hope nobody minds.

No man is an island,
Entire of itself,
Every man is a piece of the continent,
A part of the main.
If a clod be washed away by the sea,
Europe is the less.
As well as if a promontory were.
As well as if a manor of thy friend's
Or of thine own were:
Any man's death diminishes me,
Because I am involved in mankind,
And therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls;
It tolls for thee.

Tears of sadness for those lost in the horrific attacks in Paris.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
65. and that is *HIS* opinion...
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 03:17 PM
Nov 2015

Mercifully that blogger will never be in a position of authority where he'll have to make decisions like this...

PatrickforO

(14,576 posts)
82. Once again, kpete has provided food for serious thought
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 04:14 PM
Nov 2015

The French person who wrote this message is saying that it is not people, not you and I who go to war. It is governments. It is governments who set up the conditions to start wars, governments who try to convince their peoples to go to war, governments who pass laws conscripting our children and grandchildren, governments who pass laws prohibiting free speech against the war.

And in the meantime, we get up in the morning, go to work if we're lucky enough to have a job, and when we are paid we try and make ends meet. That's all most people want - ENOUGH.

Maybe we'd be better off asking ourselves what policies of ours caused the rise of this brand of fanaticism and then change those policies to promote social and economic justice.

Oh, there will be provocations - peace is a very dangerous path. The MIC is mighty, and they will do everything possible to keep peaceful policies from being put in place. This will take the form of setting provocateurs to incite fear and anger, 24/7 media propaganda enlisting the corporate-owned media organs and hate talk radio, and even criminal actions including assault, kidnapping and murder.

It is always about money, right? Profits? Business interests?

But the French writer makes the point that they are few and we the people are many.

So what should France do? What should America do? Russia? The rest of the industrialized nations?

Do you all think those governments are evolved enough to have the political courage to neutralize the international bankers and corporate interests and pursue policies of peace? Policies the ensure social and economic justice? Policies that actually create jobs that provide workers with enough?



Nah. It's far easier to drum up FEAR and RAGE.



No...sadly, 'we' are at war...sadly, many we will be told, have to die...

Sadly, many will die. A few who should, many who should not...

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
99. So if the West just leaves ISIS alone, we'll have peace just like that??
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 11:33 PM
Nov 2015

Are we really exploring this line of thought?

PatrickforO

(14,576 posts)
100. OK. Let's try a different tack.
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 01:01 AM
Nov 2015

Of course we have to catch and kill the assholes.

But to do the same thing we did in Iraq is comparable to amputating your foot if you have a corn. Clearly you need to take care of the corn (if you've ever had one you know...). But there are some other things you can do once it is removed to keep it from coming back. The first thing is good hygiene - wash your feet regularly. Next, you want good, high quality shoes and good clean socks. Then, of course, you need support - I mean orthotics. See what I mean. Yeah, cut the corn off, but do all these other things and it won't come back.

What I'm saying is that ISIS (Islamic jihadism in general) is the corn. You cut it out.

But the policies I'm talking about that promote social and economic justice - they are the hygiene, good shoes, clean socks and orthotics you need so the corn (ISIS) doesn't come back.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This is not my war, this ...