General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis is not my war, this is not our war. This is your war.
On the terrace of a restaurant, in a bar, on the street, in a concert hall.
Ours.
Died because murderers have decided to strike right in Paris and shoot into the crowd, with the aim of making the most possible victims.
11:30. Sarkozy has just declared: "We are at war."
For once I agree with him. They are at war.
You are at war, you Sarkozy, Hollande, Valls, Cameron, Netanyahu, Obama. You are at war, you and your political allies, you and your friends multinational bosses.
It's not too late. There is still time to move on. Radically.
By refusing the injunction "with us or with the terrorists".
By refusing calls for unity with the torturers and warmongers who build every day a barbaric world.
By denying world based on exploitation, theft, violence, injustice, inequality, the tendering of those who should unite.
Fight for another world that is not only possible but more necessary than ever.
Stay the course and concede nothing under the pressure of emotion or consideration.
You'll be able to tax me naïve if you want. But my idealism has never killed anyone. Unlike your "pragmatism".
It is more than ever time to "resist the irresistible".
So, no, Cambadélis. No, Sarkozy. No, Holland. "We" are not at war.
This is not my war, this is not our war. This is your war.
And once again, these are our dead. As in Madrid in 2004 and London in 2005, as in Egypt there are fifteen days as in Beirut this week.
And like everywhere you sow terror.
Your war, our dead.
Your wars, no more.
translated from french:
http://resisteralairdutemps.blogspot.fr/2015/11/vos-guerres-nos-morts.html
?1447514268
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Islamic State is the enemy and it must be crushed with global military might.
There is no stopping this. They started it, the rest of the world must finish it as judiciously as possible.
started it?
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)A coalition of world powers will finish it.
Tipperary
(6,930 posts)Good luck with that.
Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)defeat the others militarily with a huge ground offensive.... and then we will be left with what?
Another vacuum in a part of the world with plenty of nasty people ready, willing, and able to fill it.
Look, nobody is suggesting a "do nothing" approach. But to suggest that this phenomenon can or will be finished militarily is overly simplistic and quite frankly not helpful.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)How about sending your kids to fight the new crusade?
If it is your war, you should be willing to spend some blood or body parts.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)I already served and am too old to re-up.
ConservativeDemocrat
(2,720 posts)That "send your kids off to war" argument that terrorist-appeasers also always come out with is also hilariously out of date.
Apparently they still think there is some sort of Vietnam era draft going on or something.
- C.D. Proud Member of the Reality Based Community
bvar22
(39,909 posts)shed their OWN blood....not some else's kid.
This is a legitimate response to those who promote more killing and destruction.
What are YOU willing to put on the table for another WAR.
I'm not willing to put ANYTHING, no family, no friends, no children, no neighbors, no money, and no blood.
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]Where do uncaptured mouse clicks go?[/center][/font][hr]
bvar22
(39,909 posts)The REAL Reason: Because the Military Kills People and Breaks Things.
They do NOT help the locals in any form or fashion.
Everything we have done over there has made things worse...not better.
If YOU, in your arrogance, can point to anything we have done that has actually HELPED, we might have room for a conversation,
but it appears all you want to do at this point is post insults.
Cheers!
randome
(34,845 posts)Violence never solves anything but sometimes it is the proper response. A paradox, to be sure.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Where do uncaptured mouse clicks go?[/center][/font][hr]
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)their war for oil in iraq gave birth to isis.
and now the beast has been fed and unleashed.
why is that evil pustule not rotting in prison?
malaise
(269,030 posts)The inversion of reality is breath-taking.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)but there is no doubt in my mind that that sniveling creature from hell cheney was behind it.
merrily
(45,251 posts)So many inconvenient truths about Iraq for both Republicans and Democrats, including during this primary season.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Ever since the Shia/Sunni schism. Save for an Ottoman-imposed peace in the Turkish controlled areas during the Middle Ages various tribes of barbarians jacked up on religious idiocy have been gleefully butchering each other for a millennium for reasons ranging from the imbecilic to the completely and wholly incomprehensible.
All the US did was pour some more fuel on fires that have been burning for ten or eleven centuries.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)but cheney did come by smiling with a vat of kerosene...sick greedy prick
Address to the Nation on the Invasion of Iraq (January 16, 1991)
George H. W. Bush
Just 2 hours ago, allied air forces began an attack on military targets in Iraq and Kuwait. These attacks continue as I speak. Ground forces are not engaged.
This conflict started August 2d when the dictator of Iraq invaded a small and helpless neighbor. Kuwaita member of the Arab League and a member of the United Nationswas crushed; its people, brutalized. Five months ago, Saddam Hussein started this cruel war against Kuwait. Tonight, the battle has been joined.
much more at:
http://www.millercenter.org/president/speeches/speech-3428
transcript: President Clinton explains Iraq strike
CLINTON: Good evening.
Earlier today, I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors.
much more at:
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html
more at:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026211673
Senate vote on 2002 AUMF at:
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/107-2002/s237
House vote on 2002 AUMF at:
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/107/hjres114
10:16 P.M. EST
THE PRESIDENT: My fellow citizens, at this hour, American and coalition forces are in the early stages of military operations to disarm Iraq, to free its people and to defend the world from grave danger.
On my orders, coalition forces have begun striking selected targets of military importance to undermine Saddam Hussein's ability to wage war. These are opening stages of what will be a broad and concerted campaign. More than 35 countries are giving crucial support -- from the use of naval and air bases, to help with intelligence and logistics, to the deployment of combat units. Every nation in this coalition has chosen to bear the duty and share the honor of serving in our common defense.
more at http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2003/03/20030319-17.html
malaise
(269,030 posts)not mine - I never supported it - ever.
merrily
(45,251 posts)cpwm17
(3,829 posts)so Saddam would be it. That started this cycle of violence, which was greatly increased by George W. Bush.
If you destroy governments and support bad ones, massacre a lot of people, and a flood a region with a lot of weapons, terrible things happen.
merrily
(45,251 posts)cpwm17
(3,829 posts)I just mentioned the poor excuse for all of our aggressions. I think they all should be put on trial for crimes against humanity.
merrily
(45,251 posts)They think the Brits are more civilized than we are. And, as best I can tell, they love all things French. Meanwhile, DU thinks Arabs are uncivilized.
Or, it started the first time oil was discovered in the Middle East. Or when the first American oil company started operations in the Middle East.
Or, it started when Mohammed was born.
Take your pick.
And the killing and maiming continues.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)Let's us know how that's working out. K?
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)We're all at war, then.
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)Europe was at war for hundreds of years -two really big ones - the middle east has that to look forward to. The spillover will not be pleasant but it is for them to come to terms with.
We lost our chance at peace when we elected raygun and turned away for encouraging third world development.
The blind support for Israel has just inflamed the situation.
Bottom line - bush opened Pandora's box - forces are at work that cannot be managed.
History will have to run it's course.
ananda
(28,865 posts)There will be a war now. History is out of our control.
How big of a war, that is the question.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)with nothing to show for it except millions of innocent deaths, billions of dollars enriching those who profit from war, and millions of refugees fleeing the Middle East.
Does not even count the proxy wars in Africa.
USA has not won a war since WW2,btw.
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)and many of us knew that this would be the result
malaise
(269,030 posts)Good post
bvar22
(39,909 posts)Bill Clinton kept it at a slow boil with the incredible harsh sanctions and occasional cruise missile strikes
that killed over 1/2 MILLION innocent Iraqi CHILDREN.
Bush-the-Lesser then picked up the WAR torch and went nuts with an unmatched orgy of blood lust of killings, revenge, collective punishment, torture, executions, blood baths of innocents, and making brown people "disappear".
...AND, it is still not over.
Some signs indicate that it is just warming up.
A hundred years ago, we might have made peace with a different culture & religion,
to the benefit and betterment of both.... but that window has closed.
Even if we now withdrew every single American and European from the Middle East, we have killed so many family members, friends, and relatives that the Blood Feud won't end for another century. Those families and tribes have very long memories, and a strict code of revenge. They will NOT stop until they feel the scales are balanced. (Now THAT is scary).
All we have achieved in the Middle East is to unify the Islamic Fundamentalist Radical Militants from Libya to Turkey. A 16 year old boy who has had his family blown to pieces by a HellFire Missile
doesn't soon forget who is responsible.
It is too late to make nice now.
The best we can do is prepare to reap-the-whirlwind.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)The world's military cannot win this.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)killbotfactory
(13,566 posts)So, you know... progress?
tecelote
(5,122 posts)More war. The solution perpetuates the problem.
Time for diplomacy.
EL34x4
(2,003 posts)Really?
And what terms should we come to agreement on?
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Diplomacy with the nations in which IS is based. They need to eradicate IS, and have an incentive to do so.
WE need good intelligence to intercept and prevent attacks.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,321 posts)For fuck's sake, they've killed thousands of Syrians and Iraqis, and occupied significant cities and regions of those countries. IS would attack them more if they ever get the chance. They have the incentive already.
tecelote
(5,122 posts)I'm far from anti-military but I am anti-war.
Diplomacy can include a military response. But, so far, we have just blundered around making more war which has only ended up creating more profit for our war profiteers. No humanitarian advances that I see.
You're pro-war so you must see progress I don't.
Show me how our current approach has de-escalated ISIS' effect on the world instead of strengthening their position and giving them a voice?
merrily
(45,251 posts)EL34x4
(2,003 posts)They don't want to coexist.
Their demands are very clear: A worldwide Caliphate under the boot heels of their strict version of Islam.
Once we accept this, it will become easier to formulate a proper response.
merrily
(45,251 posts)EL34x4
(2,003 posts)looks for a productive and "proper" response to ISIS in Europe, the Right is greasing the axles of boxcars. They haven't been used in a while but they'll be ready to go. And when the time comes, don't be shocked if there's a lot of Europeans at the train stations helping to load them up.
While the Left dithers, the Right's response to ISIS will be very simple and effective. There will be no holding hands and singing Kumbayah.
merrily
(45,251 posts)supposed to refute that Middle Eastern wars have not solved a thing, but only made things worse?
Ever see the video in which Bin Laden said he made up his mind to attack us when he saw the blood of children running in the streets of Beirut, courtesy of an attack ordered by Poppy? That's where attacking the Middle East got us. It also got us Al Qaeda Iraq, Isis and many more recruits for terrorist organizations that want to attack us.
Now, you can address that reality or say silly things about kumbayah, but it will remain the reality.
EL34x4
(2,003 posts)Most Europeans want to be able to attend a rock concert without getting murdered. They're going to support the party that offers this.
Understanding that RW blunders in the Middle East have made a mess of the region does not put the genie back in the bottle. Now we have ISIS committing acts of atrocities on European soil. The Left had better come up with a plan to deal with this or the Right will.
All we hear from this Left right now is blame. "Bush's fault!" YES, IT WAS BUSH'S FAULT! I GET IT!
So what are we going to do about it now before fascists start winning elections?
merrily
(45,251 posts)war has?
So far, I have not seen your proposal.
Give them a choice: Live peacefully or die and let them know that either decision is perfectly acceptable.
Worked for us the last time we won a war, which also happened to be a war where Democrats were in charge.
merrily
(45,251 posts)BTW, when was the last time we "won" a war and how many wars have we, um, not "won" since the most recent war we supposedly won?
EL34x4
(2,003 posts)Where we send our soldiers to prison if they punch an enemy combatant in the face does not constitute war fighting.
Anyhow, you asked for my solution. I gave it. What's yours?
merrily
(45,251 posts)Every Muslim nation? Bomb 'em all to obliviion because they're barbaric?
Anyhow, you asked for my solution. I gave it. What's yours?
I'm not the one who ruled out diplomacy or pretended to have a solution.
I know only that, so far, war has made things worse, for the West and for humankind. Oh, and all sides have the ability to wage nuclear war. Yipppeeee!
EL34x4
(2,003 posts)It would behoove of you to come up with one quickly before the people in Europe who do have solutions start winning elections.
Anyhow, you don't want war. You want diplomatic solutions. That's perfectly understandable. War is ugly, destructive, expensive.
So let's engage in diplomacy with ISIS. Their demands are simple; convert to Islam, implement strict Sharia law in your countries, allow enslavement of your women and children. What are you going to bring to the table?
merrily
(45,251 posts)Having a solution and keeping it secret is useless. It worked temporarily for Nixon, but people soon saw that he didn't know shit from Shinola about actual solutions. But, no doubt, you do. Which should have made answering the questions in my prior post easy for you. Go ahead, give them a go.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Crickets as for doing anything else, too, which is really sad.
1monster
(11,012 posts)Like military might has crushed Al Queda and the Taliban? Like military might tries to crush the Palestinians?
The last time military might won the day was in 1945. Warfare has changed and military might is as outdated as the swords used by the Light Brigade in the Crimea.
I don't have any answers. In order to have answers, one must first understand what it is IS wants. I'm not sure that they know what they want. They are acting out of rage and probably without a game plan.
One thing that is sure, by reacting with violence, the situation is not calmed, the rage and violence grows and more and more people/countries are sucked into an ever growing maelstrom that will grow to WWIII.
Someone, the other day, posted that we are already in the beginnings of WWIII and we just haven't realized it yet. I hope saner, more thoughtful minds prevail before it is undeniable. Because
"I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stone." Albert Einstein
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)I think this >"They are acting out of rage and probably without a game plan. " < is just from our point of view, and underestimates their goals and resolve.
That's a deadly mistake for a nation which has more people moving into poverty or near poverty every day to make. It's the kind of arrogance - just because you\we don't know doesn't mean a thing. Not a thing, other than we are ignorant about something and refuse to admit it.
The groups fighting us are very well funded, thank's in part to our insatiable appetite for oil to run to McDonalds with, and they are being run by people trained in some of the finest universities in the world. Including the ones here.
Perhaps that is why we are still fighting them.
They could win. Whatever that means to them. And that may simply mean they leave nothing but a desert, devoid of life, everyone dead. Like some of our neighbors think - but that's another post.
Anyway, my point is that this makes your "calming" a much higher priority than we currently give it. And perhaps makes "winning" too scary to imagine.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)I'm sure the French Foreign Legion will take you.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)I attempted to re-enlist on 9/12/01, however, they would not take me due to two screws in my leg. I looked into surgery to have the screws removed, however, the wait time plus recovery would put me too far past my birthday to be young enough to re-enlist.
Today I am far too old to re-enlist.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Maybe one of those noble and heroic "rebel groups" in Syria will take you, hmmm?
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Hello! Anybody from the admin read DU any more?
Is this what you want DU to be? This right wing, hate filled, destructive crap?
1. Nope, it's definitely war.
View profile
Islamic State is the enemy and it must be crushed with global military might.
There is no stopping this. They started it, the rest of the world must finish it as judiciously as possible.
valerief
(53,235 posts)The more defense contractors are awarded massive chunks of taxpayer money, the more war there is.
Imagine if both of these things were massively reduced.
But religion/patriotism and media lies keep them alive.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)but rather in a market approved government program. No recruiter says "Join the Army! You'll get to fight in a war!"
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)poverty, lack of opportunity, seeing your home bombed.
Today's 20 year olds were 5-6 years old during Desert Storm. Our 1% oil wars made them the monsters we see today.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,321 posts)That's why IS kills Yazidis, or forces them into sexual slavery. That's why they kill Shiites. That's why they kill Syrian and Iraqi Christians. They are religious fanatics who hate people who don't conform to their lunatic religious ideas, and are happy to kill over it.
That's why the IS statement have phrases like "hundreds of idolaters were together in a party of perversity" to describe the rock concert, and says France was the target because of "having dared insult our prophet, having bragged about fighting Islam in France and striking Muslims in the caliphate with their planes, which have not helped them in any way in the ill-smelling streets of Paris".
Ignoring the religious basis for IS, just like the blog the OP links to does, is so bloody stupid, that people who do it aren't worth reading. Time and again IS tells the world its motivation, and some people are determined to ignore it.
valerief
(53,235 posts)into the military.
Hasn't our current wars proven they do not work? Have we made the world a better place?
No.
We're running the longest war in US history right now, why? What have we solved?
Time for a major shift in policy. Diplomacy may not be as profitable as war but we must make the change to a peaceful solution.
EL34x4
(2,003 posts)We haven't unleashed total war yet. Our grandfathers did, and it worked.
Germany and Japan, once every bit as fanatical as ISIS is today are now quite pleasant.
tecelote
(5,122 posts)"Hasn't our current wars proven they do not work?"
My grandfather's WWI medals are proudly displayed.
ISIS is not a country and we are not fighting a world war.
Show me some progress?
How have we not just made them stronger and given them a voice and reason to recruit?
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)You can't use World War II tactics to combat a terrorist organization. There is no emperor or general with whom to negotiate a peaceful settlement.
tecelote
(5,122 posts)I said the current methods are not working. Open to suggestions.
You think are current methods are working?
Examples?
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)I'm not even sure it was you I was responding to. Someone in this thread said something about how nice Japan and Germany are now after we beat them into submission in 1945. My comment was intended to point out that I don't believe that tactic works with a stateless organization like ISIS. I don't know what will.
I thought I had seen other rational responses from you in the past so I was surprised.
BTW - here is one of the better approaches I've seen - just posted by Phantom Power:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027345290
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)and builds on the point that I was clumsily trying to make. And, yes, I usually try to be rational. Thanks for noticing.
salib
(2,116 posts)War is a racket.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)down. Give peace a chance? Not a chance after you invaded my country and destroyed my opportunity. We see Americans teetering on voting for fascists in the R party. We haven't even faced an occupying army.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)interested in redressing the grievances of the past two centuries.
They are theocratic imperialists.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)
..thing I've read about the situation in Syria is that because global warming (i.e.the fossil-fuel military industrial military complex) caused so much crop failure that ordinary Syrians couldn't afford bread anymore. Hence civil war, civil unrest and the chasm into which rushed all the disaffected parties.
I think this was Joseph Stieglitz's analysis: global warming combined with the oppressions of Empire opens the door to starvation, refugee crisis and extremism of every kind.
What a mess.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)us as the Empire?
zentrum
(9,865 posts)But Europe has long Colonial tentacles all over the ME and Africa. It's the West messing in the ME.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)jtuck004
(15,882 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)jtuck004
(15,882 posts)suggesting it isn't is disingenuous. We started it a long, long time ago. And we are going to keep it alive, and re-gift it to our children.
I want to hear from the family of the security guard who saved a lot of folks by stopping a suicide bomber.
Idiots that say this isn't everyone's problem are dangerous. They get innocent people who may not know better killed.
We can and should respond with our heads, breaking with our long-standing traditions. Doubt that will happen, and you provide me with proof.
Thank you for the support, and the heads-up. Bye.
TheFarS1de
(1,017 posts)Heard of the Lindt Café ? Enjoy the illusion of being in an immunity bubble .
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)it's windy.
TheFarS1de
(1,017 posts)Way to belittle the situation . They were killed for simply being . If this won't make people pay attention then nothing ever will ... until one day your sitting down for a coffee and happen to run into an individual with an institutionalized hatred of anything different .
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)by terrorist than I am of death by earthquake. I was largely unafraid of the such an inevitability three days ago. I remain largely unafraid today. I'm not belittling the situation. I'm saying the situation is a statistical anomaly. I'm not about to begin to avoid my local coffee house for fear of ideological extremism. Living at orange, at threat level elevated just really doesn't do much good for anybody.
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)classof56
(5,376 posts)Hope nobody minds.
No man is an island,
Entire of itself,
Every man is a piece of the continent,
A part of the main.
If a clod be washed away by the sea,
Europe is the less.
As well as if a promontory were.
As well as if a manor of thy friend's
Or of thine own were:
Any man's death diminishes me,
Because I am involved in mankind,
And therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls;
It tolls for thee.
Tears of sadness for those lost in the horrific attacks in Paris.
Catherina
(35,568 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Mercifully that blogger will never be in a position of authority where he'll have to make decisions like this...
PatrickforO
(14,576 posts)The French person who wrote this message is saying that it is not people, not you and I who go to war. It is governments. It is governments who set up the conditions to start wars, governments who try to convince their peoples to go to war, governments who pass laws conscripting our children and grandchildren, governments who pass laws prohibiting free speech against the war.
And in the meantime, we get up in the morning, go to work if we're lucky enough to have a job, and when we are paid we try and make ends meet. That's all most people want - ENOUGH.
Maybe we'd be better off asking ourselves what policies of ours caused the rise of this brand of fanaticism and then change those policies to promote social and economic justice.
Oh, there will be provocations - peace is a very dangerous path. The MIC is mighty, and they will do everything possible to keep peaceful policies from being put in place. This will take the form of setting provocateurs to incite fear and anger, 24/7 media propaganda enlisting the corporate-owned media organs and hate talk radio, and even criminal actions including assault, kidnapping and murder.
It is always about money, right? Profits? Business interests?
But the French writer makes the point that they are few and we the people are many.
So what should France do? What should America do? Russia? The rest of the industrialized nations?
Do you all think those governments are evolved enough to have the political courage to neutralize the international bankers and corporate interests and pursue policies of peace? Policies the ensure social and economic justice? Policies that actually create jobs that provide workers with enough?
Nah. It's far easier to drum up FEAR and RAGE.
No...sadly, 'we' are at war...sadly, many we will be told, have to die...
Sadly, many will die. A few who should, many who should not...
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Are we really exploring this line of thought?
PatrickforO
(14,576 posts)Of course we have to catch and kill the assholes.
But to do the same thing we did in Iraq is comparable to amputating your foot if you have a corn. Clearly you need to take care of the corn (if you've ever had one you know...). But there are some other things you can do once it is removed to keep it from coming back. The first thing is good hygiene - wash your feet regularly. Next, you want good, high quality shoes and good clean socks. Then, of course, you need support - I mean orthotics. See what I mean. Yeah, cut the corn off, but do all these other things and it won't come back.
What I'm saying is that ISIS (Islamic jihadism in general) is the corn. You cut it out.
But the policies I'm talking about that promote social and economic justice - they are the hygiene, good shoes, clean socks and orthotics you need so the corn (ISIS) doesn't come back.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)How many more do we have to sacrifice before we win?