Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pa28

(6,145 posts)
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 04:05 PM Nov 2015

Former Citi CEO admits: Big bank model doesn't work. Repeal of Glass-Steagall was wrong.

Former Citigroup CEO: Big banks don't work
http://money.cnn.com/2015/11/12/investing/citigroup-john-reed-glass-steagall/

In an op-ed published in the Financial Times, John Reed says large banks like the one he used to run are now "inherently unstable and unworkable."

The man who was one of the chief architects of the "Big Bank" model now says the United States never should have repealed the Glass-Steagall banking act in 1999.

That's exactly what Democratic presidential hopefuls Bernie Sanders and Martin O'Malley have been arguing on the campaign trail. They want the law reinstated. Hillary Clinton and the Republican candidates do not.


Here is more from the complete OP-ED which can be seen here.

As I have reflected about the years since 1999, I think the lessons of Glass-Steagall and its repeal suggest that the universal banking model is inherently unstable and unworkable. No amount of restructuring, management change or regulation is ever likely to change that.


Breaking up the big banks by reinstating Glass-Steagall or something close to it is not a right/left issue. It is simply good public policy for those living outside of Wall Street. It's supported across the political spectrum from left wing economist Joseph Stigletz to right wing opinion magazines like the Weekly Standard.

Why is it framed in some political circles as a pet issue of the radical left that doesn't really matter?
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Former Citi CEO admits: Big bank model doesn't work. Repeal of Glass-Steagall was wrong. (Original Post) pa28 Nov 2015 OP
Yes - Validates HRC Is Wrong For America - Bernie Is Right For America cantbeserious Nov 2015 #1
YES YES YES SoLeftIAmRight Nov 2015 #12
I will make sure this is discussed SmittynMo Nov 2015 #14
Well this won't sit well with Third Wayers. Rex Nov 2015 #2
This reads very good I think, correct me it I am wrong as as I am trying for a drug induced stupor. LiberalArkie Nov 2015 #3
Because they always frame the debate in this country. mmonk Nov 2015 #4
+100000000 jwirr Nov 2015 #5
He is WRONG. Hillary told me the problem was "shadow banking" FlatBaroque Nov 2015 #6
For God's sake! Somebody tell him to cut it out! Ed Suspicious Nov 2015 #9
The Bank of England just re-instituted Glass-Steagall type measure for SOME reason. pa28 Nov 2015 #11
president Hillary isn't that much different from president Bush Doctor_J Nov 2015 #7
Complicates wealth management Octafish Nov 2015 #8
Great Catch 1norcal Nov 2015 #10
That makes two Citigroup CEOs to admit repealing Glass Steagall was wrong think Nov 2015 #13
Is it just me, or is something fishy going on here? They must have another special deal, erronis Nov 2015 #16
It's fishy. Enthusiast Nov 2015 #21
I don't think it's anything fishy. People get candid when they move out of the system. pa28 Nov 2015 #23
Cut it out! SoapBox Nov 2015 #15
Sensible Democrats agree. Politely telling banks to cut it out will send a strong message! pa28 Nov 2015 #19
The problem is edhopper Nov 2015 #17
Most of the people disagreeing have an agenda or never saw what was happening Hydra Nov 2015 #22
Bernie was right on many things that Hillary was wrong... AZ Progressive Nov 2015 #18
Kicked and recommended! Enthusiast Nov 2015 #20

FlatBaroque

(3,160 posts)
6. He is WRONG. Hillary told me the problem was "shadow banking"
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 04:29 PM
Nov 2015

someone needs to check this dude and set him straight

pa28

(6,145 posts)
11. The Bank of England just re-instituted Glass-Steagall type measure for SOME reason.
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 05:59 PM
Nov 2015
http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/pra/Pages/supervision/structuralreform/default.aspx

The changes are intended to ensure that ring-fenced bodies (RFBs) are protected from shocks that originate in the rest of their banking group or the financial system in order to minimise disruption to the continuity of the provision of core services.


I keep hearing that instituting similar rules in the US will cause the financial industry to flee to greener pastures. Politicians who represent Wall Street are running out of excuses.
 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
7. president Hillary isn't that much different from president Bush
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 04:47 PM
Nov 2015

I don't see any way out of the mess we're in

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
8. Complicates wealth management
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 05:01 PM
Nov 2015

Competitive nature of capitalism. Since the repeal of Glass-Steagal, UBS, Phil Gramm, Bill Clintonand George W Bush among others now can specialize in all kinds of Wealth Management:

http://financialservicesinc.ubs.com/revitalizingamerica/SenatorPhilGramm.html

1norcal

(55 posts)
10. Great Catch
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 05:37 PM
Nov 2015

Great catch Octafish, If that doesn't read like a rogues gallery I don't know what does...

 

think

(11,641 posts)
13. That makes two Citigroup CEOs to admit repealing Glass Steagall was wrong
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 06:28 PM
Nov 2015
Reed's U-turn on Glass-Steagall comes after another former Citigroup CEO and chairman Sandy Weill did the same in 2012.

Weill suggested that big banks be broken up "so that the taxpayer will never be at risk," in an interview with CNBC.

http://money.cnn.com/2015/11/12/investing/citigroup-john-reed-glass-steagall/

erronis

(15,275 posts)
16. Is it just me, or is something fishy going on here? They must have another special deal,
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 06:49 PM
Nov 2015

Perhaps reached with the help of the current administration and the expected coronation.

Or, perhaps they have already "got theirs" and want to stop other future pirates from clambering on board the Good Ship Lollipop.

pa28

(6,145 posts)
19. Sensible Democrats agree. Politely telling banks to cut it out will send a strong message!
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 07:24 PM
Nov 2015


That message being we'll have your back during the next meltdown, bail you out and say "NOBODY could have predicted this".

edhopper

(33,580 posts)
17. The problem is
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 06:52 PM
Nov 2015

assholes on the right will keep saying the whole collapse in 2008 was all because of Fanny Mae and nothing to do with G/S being repealed.

I have even had discussions here where people refuse to accept that the repeal of G/S was a major factor.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
22. Most of the people disagreeing have an agenda or never saw what was happening
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 09:21 PM
Nov 2015

I had an interesting experience over a decade ago that showed me- I tried to get a job with what I found out later was Primerica. I did the training and saw what they were doing, and saw what the deregulation allowed them to house under one roof. As the franchise owner put it, "You know the story of David and Goliath? Well, we're the Goliath. You'll stand with the biggest player behind you if you are with us."

Not knowing economics or pretty much anything else relevant to that at the time, I still had a funny feeling about what that meant. Who was watching over a power that great?

AZ Progressive

(3,411 posts)
18. Bernie was right on many things that Hillary was wrong...
Sat Nov 14, 2015, 07:00 PM
Nov 2015

What does that say about who should lead our country?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Former Citi CEO admits: B...