General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUnder 21? Then Forget About Buying Smokes In SF, Says Supe
Though an effort to raise California's smoking age to 21 stalled last month in the state Assembly, that won't stop a couple San Francisco lawmakers from trying to impose tighter regulations for young vapers and smokers at the local level.
At this afternoon's Board of Supervisors meeting (underway as we speak!), Supervisor Scott Wiener and co-sponsors Supervisor Eric Mar and Malia Cohen will introduce legislation to raise the purchasing age for tobacco products in San Francisco from 18 to 21.
In a press release announcing the legislation's introduction, Wiener says that "By raising the tobacco purchase age to 21, we can reduce adolescent tobacco use, which will help combat addiction, stop long-term illness, and prevent premature deaths."
"For decades we have seen the catastrophic health effects of tobacco use, and every day we spend millions of dollars treating people who suffer from an addiction which often starts in their teens. San Francisco can help lead a statewide and national movement to improve the health of our youth and save lives."
http://sfist.com/2015/11/17/supervisor_wiener_to_introduce_legi.php
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)I will suggest they do this in San Diego.
msongs
(67,420 posts)Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)18 is an adult, and I think they should be free to smoke at 18 if they want too.
RandySF
(58,932 posts)JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)Fight, DIE!
Just dont do anything offensive and bad for like smoke.
Since we just found out bacon's about as dangerous should we set the age to 21 on that too? Or is it still a kids meal option at Dennys?
etherealtruth
(22,165 posts)I have a real problem with holding people accountable as "adults" yet denying them the full freedoms of adults (yes, adults are even free to make poor choices)