General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWords matter in ‘ISIS’ war, so use ‘Daesh’
Words matter in ISIS war, so use DaeshBy Zeba Khan at the Boston Globe
https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2014/10/09/words-matter-isis-war-use-daesh/V85GYEuasEEJgrUun0dMUP/story.html
"SNIP.............
Whether referred to as ISIS, ISIL, or IS, all three names reflect aspirations that the United States and its allies unequivocally reject. Political and religious leaders all over the world have noted this. French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said, This is a terrorist group and not a state. . . the term Islamic State blurs the lines between Islam, Muslims, and Islamists. President Obama made similar remarks saying, ISIL is not Islamic . . . and [is] certainly not a state.
Muslim scholars around the world have denounced the groups attempt to declare a caliphate. Egyptian Islamic theologian Yusuf al-Qaradawi published an open letter to Muslim scholars explaining, A group simply announcing a caliphate is not enough to establish a caliphate. The Syrian Sufi leader Muhammad al-Yacoubi called the groups declaration illegitimate and that supporting it was haram, or forbidden.
The term Daesh is strategically a better choice because it is still accurate in that it spells out the acronym of the groups full Arabic name, al-Dawla al-Islamiya fi al-Iraq wa al-Sham. Yet, at the same time, Daesh can also be understood as a play on words and an insult. Depending on how it is conjugated in Arabic, it can mean anything from to trample down and crush to a bigot who imposes his view on others. Already, the group has reportedly threatened to cut out the tongues of anyone who uses the term.
Why do they care so much? The same reason the United States should. Language matters.
..............SNIP"
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Al-Qaeda v2.0. We invaded the wrong country after 9/11.
TheBlackAdder
(28,209 posts).
It was something how the way GWB said it meant a derogatory term in Iraq.
It didn't change anything, just made GWB sound even more ignorant.
.
snot
(10,530 posts)"Hatred never ceases by hatred;
But by love alone is healed.
This is an ancient and eternal law."
-- "Dhammapada," Ch. 1, the Twin Verses 5, as quoted by Maha Ghosananda
El Supremo
(20,365 posts)But how do you pronounce it in Arabic?
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)cigsandcoffee
(2,300 posts)DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)how do you pronounce it? Is it Die-ish? Dish? Dash? Not trying to be snarky, but I do want to know.
applegrove
(118,696 posts)BlueMTexpat
(15,370 posts)"Dah-esh" in his speeches.
I try to use that term as much as possible, in part because it infuriates the group.
spiderpig
(10,419 posts)Dah-esh Dah-esh Dah-esDah-eshDah-eshDah-eshDah-eshDah-eshDah-eshDah-eshDah-eshDah-eshDah-eshDah-eshDah-esh
underahedgerow
(1,232 posts)That works!
BlueMTexpat
(15,370 posts)it you meant it as a sneer, I'll overlook it.
Once.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Jim Beard
(2,535 posts)it is pronounced Dash.
lame54
(35,294 posts)or it should be
47of74
(18,470 posts)That was my thought.
MynameisBlarney
(2,979 posts)I know it's wrong, but to hell with them.
AllyCat
(16,192 posts)Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)rollin74
(1,976 posts)#daeshbags
https://twitter.com/hashtag/daeshbags
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)Tipperary
(6,930 posts)sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)goddess. A bit of irony there methinks.
B2G
(9,766 posts)And maybe turn it into a hastag.
That'll show them!
philosslayer
(3,076 posts)ISIS and/or ISIL are defamatory to peace loving Muslims. It provides a link through the word "Islamic" that shouldn't be there. So Daesh is certainly more appropriate.
B2G
(9,766 posts)is defamatory to peace loving Baptists and Christians, but I don't see multiple threads to call them anything else.
ShrimpPoboy
(301 posts)and mounting violent international attacks, you might.
My .02: i like that our leaders are using "daesh" because it apparently offends them, but what we as individuals call it on a message board or in real life seems pretty irrelevant. I'll probably keep saying ISIS out if habit.
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)Jim Beard
(2,535 posts)LiberalLovinLug
(14,174 posts)It is they that should be using this word. That would really sting. I'm sure they wouldn't be too concerned about Westerners calling them anything, and would be amused at some western message board that can't even figure out how to say it.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)klook
(12,157 posts)shadowmayor
(1,325 posts)Al qaeda 3.0 which is what they really are. There's the original al qaeda, the al qaeda in Iraq (2.0) and the new upgrade 3.0.
ericson00
(2,707 posts)We should not use the enemy's language to describe them. It is ISIS: The Islamic State in Iraq and Syria.
applegrove
(118,696 posts)Daesh is an acronym that is insulting to them. That is why we should use it.
Jinx
(255 posts)Just that Kerry and others have used it lately. Thanks for the information!
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Wash. state Desk Jet
(3,426 posts)They have no country,no face,no flag and no religion.
The term Daesh is strategically a better choice because it is still accurate in that it spells out the acronym of the groups full Arabic name, al-Dawla al-Islamiya fi al-Iraq wa al-Sham. Yet, at the same time, Daesh can also be understood as a play on words and an insult. Depending on how it is conjugated in Arabic, it can mean anything from to trample down and crush to a bigot who imposes his view on others. Already, the group has reportedly threatened to cut out the tongues of anyone who uses the term.
It seems "Daesh" is fitting ,on one hand it is a false front and on the other it simply is what it is.
GoneOffShore
(17,340 posts)When I heard about Kerry and Hollande's use of daesh for the criminals who call themselves ISIL, I was impressed. They know yet another way to push these gangsters buttons.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,503 posts)When in doubt, I rely on the Associated Press Stylebook. The AP isn't ready to make the change yet, but you know how that works. Next week, they might say, "okay, we've decided to accept 'Daesh.'"
Ask the Editor
love_katz
(2,580 posts)Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)Let's get real- changing the name we call them accomplishes zero aside from making some people think they have done something when they haven't don't anything.
It won't do squat in the fight against them. But if it makes you feel better than go ahead.
applegrove
(118,696 posts)against the notion that ISIS is fighting a holy war, what is wrong with that?
Yorktown
(2,884 posts)Like it?
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)ISIS or ISIL works just fine for me.
Generic Brad
(14,275 posts)Two bit sexually repressed punks who have resorted to violence because their loser ideas have been rejected world wide.
stuarttman63
(18 posts)I've noticed that the republicans refer to them as ISIS or ISIL or the Islamic State because it fits in with their narrative that we are at war with Islam itself. This of course dove-tails really nicely with DAESH's corresponding narrative that they are at war with the West and with Judeo-Christianity itself. We should call them DAESH not because it angers them or hurts their feelings but because it refutes the idea that they represent Islam. We should also call them DAESH because it refutes the corresponding idea that the republicans represent Judeo-Christian values and the values of Western Democracy.