General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDespite Atrocities, US Approves $1.29 Billion Deal to Re-Arm Saudi Arabia
http://www.commondreams.org/news/2015/11/17/despite-atrocities-us-approves-129-billion-deal-re-arm-saudi-arabiaThe Pentagon announced on Monday that the U.S. has approved a $1.29 billion arms sale to Saudi Arabia, despite widespread mounting evidence of the country's mass atrocities and possible war crimes in neighboring Yemen.
The U.S. State Department on Friday approved the sale of over 10,000 bombs, munitions, and weapons parts produced by Boeing and Raytheon. This includes 5,200 Paveway II "laser guided" and 12,000 "general purpose" bombs. "Bunker Busters," also included in the deal, are designed to destroy concrete structures.
"The proposed sale augments Saudi Arabia's capability to meet current and future threats from potential adversaries during combat operations," the Defense Security Cooperation Agency, which is part of the U.S. Department of Defense, said in an announcement of the deal released Monday.
But Raed Jarrar, government relations manager for the American Friends Service Committee (AFSC), told Common Dreams: "Sending additional weapons to the Middle East will not stabilize the region or put an end to violence and extremism. Supporting proxy wars, interventions, and military occupations will only add fuel to the fire."
"It's also illegal under US and international law to transfer weapons to human rights abusers, or to forces that will likely use it to commit gross violations of human rights," Jarrar continued. "There is documented evidence that such abuses have been committed by almost all of U.S. allies in the region."
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)IMHO, money is the whole purpose as well as "culling the herd". There's just too many of us commoners for the wealthy to be comfortable enough.
cpwm17
(3,829 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)get the red out
(13,466 posts)The Saudi Government is a nasty bunch of monsters; so lets arm them to the teeth.
phantom power
(25,966 posts)http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027345290
http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a39727/paris-attacks-middle-eastern-oligarchies/
Orrex
(63,216 posts)That's been the objection I've heard again and again when calling out the xenophobes who can't stand the thought of the US taking in refugees.
"We need to take care of our own first," they say. "We need that money for our veterans first."
I'll bet that $1.29B would do a lot of good for "our own." Other nations in that geographic region likewise enjoy generous aid from our government; perhaps we could pare that back as well.
valerief
(53,235 posts)odd_duck
(107 posts)polly7
(20,582 posts)librechik
(30,674 posts)no matter who we vote for. Because the people who make policy aren't elected and we don't
even know their names.
http://www.bostonglobe.com/ideas/2014/10/18/vote-all-you-want-the-secret-government-won-change/jVSkXrENQlu8vNcBfMn9sL/story.html?event=event25