General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCould Donald Trump actually win?
What once seemed to be utterly ridiculous now seems plausible.
It's entirely possible he'll win the republican nomination and face Hillary.
Would the American electorate be stupid enough to vote for someone with no experience in government over someone who has tons of experience? Sure they would.
There are masses of people who believe that the Presidency really is analogous to being a CEO and who view Trump as a successful CEO.
Nothing motivates Republicans to vote like the prospect of voting against HRC. Will democrats be as motivated?
On terrorism, a recent post-Paris poll shows that voters are evenly divided between the two as to who would be best on the issue.
swing states: Recent polls show Trump beating HRC in CO and Florida- by significant margins.
Americans appear to be in a cycle of strong distaste for career politicians. Many voters seem to believe that HRC is indebted to Wall Street and corporations, and that Trump is not.
Historical precedent: The party having held the WH for two terms, rarely wins.
The unthinkable has become possible.
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/latest-fau-poll-has-trump-lapping-the-field-in-florida-as-clinton-trails-in-matchups-with-gop-frontrunners-300181074.html
http://www.businessinsider.com/r-exclusive-after-paris-americans-see-trump-clinton-as-most-able-to-address-terrorism-poll-2015-11
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2015/10/donald-trump-could-be-president
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/trackers/2015-11-18/clinton-far-behind-4-republicans-in-swing-state-colorado-poll
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)If Trump's the R nominee, he'll take a dive for Hillary. It's her turn dammit.
cali
(114,904 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Wall St./MIC/1% wins
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)-Robert A. Heinlein.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)George Carlin famously talked about:
We May Have Bill Clinton to Thank for Donald Trump's Presidential Run"
http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2015/08/bill-clinton-donald-trump
Is Donald Trump Running a False Flag Campaign to Help Hillary Clinton?
http://blackbag.gawker.com/is-donald-trump-running-a-false-flag-campaign-to-help-h-1723925057
Bill Clinton and Donald Trump held 2016 chat
http://www.cnn.com/2015/08/05/politics/donald-trump-bill-clinton-2016/
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)FACT: Four Trump allies and one Clinton associate familiar with the exchange said that Clinton encouraged Trumps efforts to 'play a larger role' in the Republican Party and 'offered his own views' of the political landscape.
FACT: Clintons personal office in New York confirmed that the call occurred in late May.
Another link for you to ignore.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/bill-clinton-called-donald-trump-ahead-of-republicans-2016-launch/2015/08/05/e2b30bb8-3ae3-11e5-b3ac-8a79bc44e5e2_story.html
cali
(114,904 posts)99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Either way, Wall St./MIC/BigOil/BigPharma/1% wins. <-- this is my claim, and I stand by it.
You obviously disagree.. that doesn't change the fact that a Trump v. Clinton GE
means the middle class loses, along with any chance to salvage what's left of this once
great democracy from the Oligarchy that is trying to buy it..
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,182 posts)....his ego's in constant need of petting. So communicating with a former President is a YYYYUUUGGGEEE deal to him. It shows he still rubs elbows with the powerful.
That doesn't mean it's a reciprocal arrangement. Bill Clinton has met with nearly every single rich and powerful person this world has to offer over the past 25 years. Donald Trump is a nobody compared to most of those people.
So Donald Trump calling up Bill Clinton might be a big deal to Donald Trump, but I doubt Bill Clinton really cared that Donald Trump sought him out. Humoring him over the phone for five minutes hardly means the two were conspiring on electoral shenanigans.
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)To me, this all-too-evident coziness of the Trump/Clintons relationship socially -- and often privately at posh parties -- reeks to high heaven, and is emblematic of how the 1% titans of wealth & privilege laugh all the way to the bank, while "playing" the rest of us for fools.
This kind of cozy insider Establishment politics is the problem, not the solution.
librechik
(30,674 posts)he will win the Republican nomination.
However, the RNC might balk at the last minute and force a brokered convention in which they will choose a candidate behind closed doors more or less, and wind up with a different candidate than the obvious,
None of this will help, as it is pretty clear they are all lunatics, and only the lunatics are committed to voting for them. They are so unpopular they might even try not stealing this election since it won't even be close, no matter who the Dems pick.
valerief
(53,235 posts)He had SCOTUS and then vote flips in Ohio get him selected. But he was the figurehead president for 8 years.
MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)only the very oldest millennials were even eligible to vote in 2000.
valerief
(53,235 posts)the oligarchs are exercising massive voter suppression and doing their damnedest to get as many millenials in prison for their slave labor and additional voter suppression and cycle of poverty.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Trump's ego is remarkable for not running for Senate first.
any Republican nominee has a pretty good chance in the GE. personal characteristics are secondary, and will only fiddle around on the margins -- they could make a difference in a close election.
Trump's biggest obstacle will be his own desire for the job -- i don't get the feeling he really wants to do it. it doesn't matter what party you're from and how shitty you do, there's still a lot of work to be done. even W didn't get through unscathed. you get a lot of pressure and responsibility for what is not (to a Trump) a whole lot of salary.
someone who has no sense of civic responsibility would find such work ... taxing.
kimbutgar
(21,163 posts)Mike that will destroy him.
The movie, Face in the crowd" reminds me of trump.
cali
(114,904 posts)0rganism
(23,957 posts)the whore media fawningly covers 24/7 the vile sewage he spews.
Republicans apparently find it endearing.
it won't play as well in the general, but that won't make it easy for the D nominee.
TBF
(32,067 posts)in the polls. That is what democrats should be focusing on.
mnhtnbb
(31,394 posts)phantom power
(25,966 posts)It's disturbing that one of our two major parties has essentially lost its mind. Because the fact is, they will wield enormous power even if they don't "win." And they might win.
n2doc
(47,953 posts)We know the RW nutcase base will vote in any election, 2010 and 2014 showed that. Will the Democratic Nominee be able to generate enough enthusiasm from D's and I's to overcome that? Or will people stay home again because they aren't inspired?
Rex
(65,616 posts)And he has unlimited money and resources. He is considered a joke...but that is a mistake imo.
MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)hearing this on election night over and over again "The demographics have changed"
cali
(114,904 posts)Take a look at swing state polling
MillennialDem
(2,367 posts)ally impossible but it's extremely long odds.
FLPanhandle
(7,107 posts)I think he will alienate 3/4 of voters before the general.
cali
(114,904 posts)lame54
(35,294 posts)of course he can win
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)If it's Trump vs Clinton, I think it's anybody's guess who wins.
AZ Progressive
(3,411 posts)Dems to Win
(2,161 posts)Many Americans, including many independents and Democrats, think it is perfectly reasonable to expect the federal government to enforce our immigration laws. On this issue alone, I think there's a good chance Trump will win.
The Establishment of both parties has not created a country where things are going well for most people. I don't think a status quo candidate, who is competent in the current system, will draw enough people to the polls to beat an anti-Establishment candidate.
We'll have a MUCH better chance of victory if we follow the enthusiastic young people and nominate Bernie.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)ever since the establishment darling jeb! failed to take off, its been the trump show. and since we know the establishment wants hillary, a hillary/trump matchup is possible. i hope bernie gets to the ge, and he will best trump according to the polls, but if it is hillary, get used to saying president trump. she is very unlikely to beat him, especially now.
Gothmog
(145,321 posts)Trump is a weak general election candidate who will get less than 20% of the Latino vote and the GOP needs 45% to have a chance. Predictwise wise gives Trump a 8% chance and gives Sanders only a 4% chance of being POTUS http://www.predictwise.com/politics/2016president
Va Lefty
(6,252 posts)if another major city like Baltimore riots next summer, I can see him running on a "Law and Order" platform like Nixon in '68 and winning. If, God forbid, we have a major terrorist attack in the US he would win.
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)It's certainly not impossible that Trump could beat Clinton (or O'Malley), but his appeal outside of his core vote is so limited that the odds would be heavily against him.
If the Democrats pick Sanders, who has the same problem, and the Republicans pick Trump, then all bets are off - the force is so stoppable and the object so moveable that anything could happen. But that's very unlikely twice over to happen.
BlueStater
(7,596 posts)The election? Nope.
He has some of the highest negative ratings of any candidate. Hispanics aren't going to vote for him. Most women aren't going to vote for him. Young voters see him as the racist, sexist windbag that he is. His support comes primarily from white men over 40, which isn't a large enough demographic to win with just their votes alone.
He's fucked.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)kairos12
(12,862 posts)Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)running away from terrorism and close to half the country say Donald Trump would be the best candidate at fighting terrorism - I have to admit that it is possible.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)We elected Reagan...who no one took seriously.
The biggest city in our much more liberal neighbor to the north elected a crack - smoking buffoon mayor...twice. do not EVER underestimate the ignorance of an electorate or the power of an angry populace hungry for change.
Vinca
(50,279 posts)The only thing that might save the Dem candidate is if the semi-sane in the GOP don't vote or vote Democratic. The election isn't generating as much excitement on the left as it is on the right and that's a bad thing for this country.
Timmy5835
(373 posts)Last edited Wed Nov 18, 2015, 07:34 PM - Edit history (1)
If one of them can garner at least 46% of the Latino vote. Falling short mean a Democratic win. Think about it, it's Latinos that could actually decide this election.