Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,081 posts)
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 01:19 PM Nov 2015

New York Times: Mass Surveillance Isn’t the Answer to Fighting Terrorism

(NYT) It’s a wretched yet predictable ritual after each new terrorist attack: Certain politicians and government officials waste no time exploiting the tragedy for their own ends. The remarks on Monday by John Brennan, the director of the Central Intelligence Agency, took that to a new and disgraceful low.

Speaking less than three days after coordinated terrorist attacks in Paris killed 129 and injured hundreds more, Mr. Brennan complained about “a lot of hand-wringing over the government’s role in the effort to try to uncover these terrorists.”

What he calls “hand-wringing” was the sustained national outrage following the 2013 revelations by Edward Snowden, a former National Security Agency contractor, that the agency was using provisions of the Patriot Act to secretly collect information on millions of Americans’ phone records. In June, President Obama signed the USA Freedom Act, which ends bulk collection of domestic phone data by the government (but not the collection of other data, like emails and the content of Americans’ international phone calls) and requires the secretive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to make its most significant rulings available to the public.

These reforms are only a modest improvement on the Patriot Act, but the intelligence community saw them as a grave impediment to antiterror efforts. In his comments Monday, Mr. Brennan called the attacks in Paris a “wake-up call,” and claimed that recent “policy and legal” actions “make our ability collectively, internationally, to find these terrorists much more challenging.” .....................(more)

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/18/opinion/mass-surveillance-isnt-the-answer-to-fighting-terrorism.html?ref=opinion&_r=0




4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New York Times: Mass Surveillance Isn’t the Answer to Fighting Terrorism (Original Post) marmar Nov 2015 OP
Maybe if they would narrow their scope from spying on everyone to concentrating on the bad guys, -none Nov 2015 #1
Amen and a thousand times Amen! n/t markpkessinger Nov 2015 #2
PM kick marmar Nov 2015 #3
The spying is more about getting access to funds JEB Nov 2015 #4

-none

(1,884 posts)
1. Maybe if they would narrow their scope from spying on everyone to concentrating on the bad guys,
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 04:57 PM
Nov 2015

they might have better luck. There isn't enough time till the sun goes super nova to comb through the information collected already from everyone who will never ever be a problem.

These reforms are only a modest improvement on the Patriot Act, but the intelligence community saw them as a grave impediment to antiterror efforts. In his comments Monday, Mr. Brennan called the attacks in Paris a “wake-up call,” and claimed that recent “policy and legal” actions “make our ability collectively, internationally, to find these terrorists much more challenging.”
 

JEB

(4,748 posts)
4. The spying is more about getting access to funds
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 10:57 PM
Nov 2015

than any actual terror prevention. Privateering corporations working to skin the citizens out of their tax dollars.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»New York Times: Mass Sur...