General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI'm with Keith (Ellison, D-MN) ... it's "Daesh", not Islamic State because: "They are neither...
...Islamic nor are they a state."
They hate being called "Daesh", saying they will cut out the tongue of anyone using it. So, like Keith, I'm going to call them Daesh.
You probably will not, as you've already been asked several times and have failed to do so.
Throd
(7,208 posts)I never understood why we refer to them by the name of their choosing.
forest444
(5,902 posts)And what we need is an international coalition that can not only dash the douchebags to pieces - but who'll finally do something about their sugar daddy: SAUDI ARABIA.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)Daesh works for me.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)I'm fucking weary of people making that excuse.
Marr
(20,317 posts)Women, gays, intellectuals, atheists, free thinkers of any stripe are the particular targets of that group, and they aren't just doing it because it sounded like a neat idea. They're doing it because of their religion.
I do not understand this bizarre push on behalf of so many western liberals to rehabilitate the image of a religion that they aren't even a part of. I mean, how fucking weird is it for some western atheist/christian/pagan/whatever to point at a jihadist-- someone is openly and proudly murdering/terrorizing people in the name of his religion-- and say, 'he's no Muslim'?
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)Does it call itself Islamic? Yes.
Do other Islamic people want to recognize it as Islamic? Some do. Some don't.
So I would say it is Islamic but it does not represent all Islamic people, just some of them.
But yes, it is Islamic. It is not the entirety of the Muslim religion. But it is a part of it.
And all people of the Muslim religion who disapprove of it need to express their disapproval and explain to young Muslims why they disapprove.
Good point that you make.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)Allahu Akbar is apparently not Islamic enough for some people. Weary is the least of my emotions.
treestar
(82,383 posts)It is their claiming to be the Islamic State - they are not, they are just a terror group.
trotsky
(49,533 posts)They are indeed Islamic. Not HIS version of Islam - thankfully - but they have their own interpretation.
How is it pronounced? DAY-esh?
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)Marr
(20,317 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)of words with a poll?
Marr
(20,317 posts)strong majority support in the Muslim community for statements like, 'the Charlie Hebdo cartoonists deserved to be prosecuted for drawing cartoons of Muhammad', 'it should be illegal to criticize Islam', and in many places even 'suicide bombing is often a legitimate tactic'.
Fundamentalist views are mainstream views in the Muslim world. Keith Ellison is an outlier here, not the representation of the 'real Islam'. Claiming otherwise is just telling yourself a feel-good story that isn't true.
I don't understand why people insist that these moderate types of people, regardless of religion, who (very sanely) ignore whole swaths of their religious texts, dismissing them as metaphor or allegory or just plain, outdated garbage, are somehow more legitimately pious than people who live their entire lives according to the dictates of their holy book. It's absolutely backward.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)to the exact same deity at the exact same times all over the world? Or different in that they worship in the same language, using the same book, all across the globe?
These people would happily kill me for being an atheist. They would kill my friends for being Jews, gays, or pagans. Why the rush to defend the indefensible?
Fuck them. Fuck their beliefs.
randys1
(16,286 posts)they are mostly Muslim.
Maybe we only close the Mosques where really stern looking men are in charge....
Yep
Marr
(20,317 posts)Though I'll be the first to admit, I've often resisted agreeing with people on some of these points-- and even argued against them-- for exactly that reason. In hindsight, however, I think that's wrong. It's much simpler and to discuss the world as it is, warts and all, not just take sides according to where the political line of scrimmage falls that day.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)Codeine
(25,586 posts)This is about the ridiculous denial by a certain segment of the left that ISIS/ISIL/Daesh isn't Islamic.
Do they represent the whole of the religion? Of course not.
Are they representative of a movement and a tendency within Islam? Absofuckinglutely. Ii is patently absurd to assert otherwise.
I'm completely fine with Syrian refugees being allowed entry into this country and into my state. Immigration of all sorts is a net positive IMHO.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Though I don't speak arabic.
brucefan
(1,549 posts)He pronounced it Dash
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)spedtr90
(719 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)I also came across the Muslim Brotherhood idea, or that of its founder, that they "excommunicate" other Muslims who are not so extreme and will attack them as infidels.
Rotegard
(29 posts)There are over 1.6 Billion people on this planet professing one of the many forms of Islam. Calling Daesh IS, ISIL, or ISIS is buying into its claim to represent the only "legitimate" Islam. Sufi teachers in the west, like the late Idries Shah or Pir Vilayet Khan will tell you that fundamentalists from the Islamic tradition usually are more fanatical than their Christian or Hindu counterparts. Many of the most enlightened and creative people I have known have come from Islam and that Includes Keith. Don't buy into Daesh's BS.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Thinking of all the Muslims in India, Indonesia, or other places who are just living their lives and might be considered "infidels" by the members of Daesh. We need that word in the dictionary too as it auto corrects to Dash.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Sort of like sexual orientation or gender identity - if a person says he or she is gay or trans, for example, the civilized, respectful thing to do is to respect the person's self-identity statements.
Daesh self-identifies as Islamic, so they're Islamic.
I do understand that there are plenty of flavors of Islam that are not batshit and murderous though.
treestar
(82,383 posts)or, we do not want them to succeed with that, as they would be as bad or worse than the Taliban.
ck4829
(35,077 posts)If anyone says that, they might as well be handing them guns and ammo, just cut out the middleman.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)It doesn't impugn all Muslims to point out that they have some really bad--even evil--elements in their religion and in their religious governments, like SA.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)Is "ISIS" too cool, like action movie cool?
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)I think that's kind of an overblown myth that grew legs and makes people feel like they're doing something. I call them ISIS. I don't think it matters a goddamn what they're called.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)Daesh allows us to separate them.
philosslayer
(3,076 posts)Because that other name (unfairly) links them with peace loving Muslims. Which Daesh is not.
brooklynite
(94,598 posts)...since clearly they're "not Christian".
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)fucking stupid as those who trash the President for not saying Islamic Extremists. Who cares what we call them? When they stop killing in the name of Allah, I'll stop calling them Islamic.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)what anonymous posters on the internet call them? I just don't see the point in this discussion.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)We don't call the KKK Radical Christians, nor followers of David Koresh, Jim Jones, etc.
We shouldn't call these terrorist jihadists Radical Islamists.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)Just an ugly, extreme perversion of a religion--what happens when you take teachings and beliefs to their most ludicrous exaggerated ends.
Lordquinton
(7,886 posts)I agree that calling them a state gives them too much legitimacy, but they follow the same book, and I know several peace loving Muslim countries where an atheist like many here would be murdered for apostasy just as fast as they would by daesh.
doc03
(35,348 posts)latest thing to be politically correct or his idea of a strategy to rid the world of the SOBs.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)someone for evil. And many times.
I love genealogy and always wanted to find a Jesse James in my tree. Well I did finally find the bad guy I was looking for but I would love to deny him.
He turns out to have been one of the most evil Christian crusaders in history. That also does not impugn all Christians. But it happened.
When we call them Islamic without any explanation we are saying that they are all alike. Daesh gives this evil group an explanation that divides them from people like Keith.
treestar
(82,383 posts)It is denying that they have the "Islamic State" they claim to want.
TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)They are Islam's version of Westboro Baptist Church, but with the power to chop off heads and throw gays off of rooftops.
UGH
How many of those suicide bombers do you think expect to be meeting their 72 virgins? I'd bet virtually every one of them!
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)...we all can't do that.
TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)Why we should refer to them as the Islamic State as if they are a state is beyond me.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)I'll consider calling them Radical Islamists.
TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)however loosely affiliated. (And WRONG.) I don't think it's a requirement, though, I don't exactly know.
While some may justify their beliefs with the bible, do they routinely actually claim to act in God's name and holler "Jehovah" when they commit a crime?
I think the better analogy is Westboro Baptist. These people are extremist Christians who claim to be acting in God's name.
Brigadier Pudding
(6 posts)How does ISIS's wars of conquest differ from Muhammad and the first Muslim's wars of conquest?
ColesCountyDem
(6,943 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)wrong names allows the kind of hatred we are seeing for all Muslims. The are daesh.
Journeyman
(15,036 posts)Is it with a long A, like "base," or a short A, like "bash"? Or is it something different, where both the A and the E are vocalized?
And then there's the question of how to pronounce the "sh" at the end -- hard or soft?
I'm not being snarky. I just rarely watch televised news, so have no idea how to pronounce it.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)closeupready
(29,503 posts)even though they are living in backwater USA ...
If the SCTV cast were doing their thing today, they'd be really busy.
TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)Are Baptists Christians?
Methodists?
Catholics?
Fundamentalist Christians might argue that Catholics aren't really Christian, but most of the world lumps then in with the Christians - at least, for the bashing part.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I'm certain they will afford you all the attention your nomenclature indeed warrants. No doubt, sticking your tongue out at them will affect them much the same...
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Keith, too many States say they murder LGBT and artists to be Islamic for you to be able to wave it all away with split hairs and sophistry.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)mishi48.59
(15 posts)geardaddy
(24,931 posts)Liberalagogo
(1,770 posts)ISIS was dropped in season six, because of the terrorist group.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archer_%28season_6%29
geardaddy
(24,931 posts)cpwm17
(3,829 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)[IMG][/IMG]
mwrguy
(3,245 posts)maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)Or is that in dispute?
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)was by a photographer friend in northern Iraq who was posting pics of Kobane refugee kids. He explained to me that it is the derisive term used by locals.
FSogol
(45,488 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,322 posts)We have arguments about whether we need to be using 'Daesh', and not the English equivalent 'ISIS' or 'ISIL' (and we had discussions, though not so heated, about which of those was better to use); whether 'Islamic State' is ever appropriate (the BBC was criticised for sometimes using that, and now uses more frequently "so-called Islamic State", though I've also seen atheists criticising them for that because that was taken as implying they're not really Islamic, and they wanted "the Islamic so-called State" instead, despite the ugliness of that phrasing); and whether they should/can/must be called "radical Islam", "militant Islam", "Islamic terrorists", and the difference between Islam/Islamist/Islamic/Islamicist.
What I find notable is the amount of bad faith assumed about people who don't use the exact language that a complainant insists on. I think this is a 'first world problem' par excellence, and may be a symptom of our uselessness in prioritisation.
FSogol
(45,488 posts)LuvNewcastle
(16,847 posts)MBS
(9,688 posts)So if anyone has the authority to explain why it's important to use "Daesh", it's him.
As you said: if Ellison says to do this, then we should.
geardaddy
(24,931 posts)He is awesome.
MBS
(9,688 posts)geardaddy
(24,931 posts)Marr
(20,317 posts)I guess.
Codeine
(25,586 posts)CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)It's kind of like the Teabaggers: the name they gave themselves is memorable for all the wrong reasons.
WDIM
(1,662 posts)Obama calls then ISIL which is also better
Isis is a goddess not a terrorist.
They are islamic but they are not a state nor are they the Islamic State. I agree we should not be calling then a State or caliphate. They are a roving gang of thugs and tyrannical butchers. Daesh is a much more fitting term.
I think US media sticks with ISIS because its catchier andbrolls off the tongue. It more about propaganda then being correct.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)It's an acronym, identical to ISIS, but in Arabic.
Rotegard
(29 posts)Can be construed as Arabic term for stomping, or a bigot who sows discord. The Pun is why they will cut out your tongue if you call them that.
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)They most certainly are NOT representative of the vast majority of Muslims, no more than Westboro Baptist is representative of the vast majority of Christians, but to claim they aren't Islamic is laughable.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)Have at it, that's your choice.
But keep in mind that you've been admonishing people from the start of this thread, basically saying that anyone that doesn't agree with you and Ellison are wrong.
Sauce. Goose. Gander.
moondust
(19,993 posts)Does it matter? ISIS is easy to recognize and remember.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)SoCalDem
(103,856 posts)like Kerry calls it..
I always bristle every time I hear one of our "leaders" say EYE-rack, instead of EEEEErock
If you are going to acknowledge a thing, person,place, at least pronounce the name properly....the way THEY say it..
Codeine
(25,586 posts)Is Angela Merkel from Germany or Deutschland? Are you the sort of person who likes to mention the time he went to "Barthelona"?
Every culture mispronounces the names of foreign places and people. My own state was governed by a man whose accent was so thick he never quite managed to pronounce the name of the place correctly.
Also, dye-esh isn't exactly right either. It's closer than what Kerry manages, but it's still off.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Arabic letters and Arabic phonemes do not map 1-to-1 with English letters and phonemes, so trying to express how to pronounce Daesh using English letters and pronunciations never quite gets it right.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)though he is not in my district but I like where he stands. So from now on Daesh.
brooklynite
(94,598 posts)They are a State in that they control AND administer territory and population.
They are Islamic in that they govern themselves based on an interpretation of Islam.