General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPrediction: 150,000 NATO Force in Syria by May 30
Mainly French and US ground forces, with large contingent of Germans.
Hate to say it, but the writing looks to be on the wall now.
Renew Deal
(81,861 posts)And he doesn't want to give republicans any reasons to use the military since they cannot be trusted with it.
Obama has actively tried to end conflicts (Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, Cuba, Israel/Palestine). It wouldn't surprise me if he did whatever it takes to end Syria/ISIS too.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)There are already hints of drumbeats on these very boards.
MowCowWhoHow III
(2,103 posts)alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)MowCowWhoHow III
(2,103 posts)alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)MowCowWhoHow III
(2,103 posts)alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)legal under international law?
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)In this case, the US will prefer a NATO force, and the French view will prevail that the NATO force should be UN approved. Of course, it will be. Any further Raqqa-directed terrorist attacks on NATO members (but especially France or Germany) will serve as the trigger event for a NATO response under UN approval.
Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)& obtain UN international solidarity behind such action, including China, Russia, ...
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)I'm making predictions here.
Nothing will go without UN Security Council approval, which will require the Russians and Chinese to not veto, at the very least. They will not veto, because Putin will have received assurances of keeping a gov't he wants in Damascus, and China will get other concessions and really doesn't care all that much so long as the oil keeps flowing.