Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lindysalsagal

(20,741 posts)
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 07:08 PM Dec 2015

Possible solution: Load guns with trackers so stockpiles can be detected by satellite

I'm thinking that it is now easy to imbed anything with a GPS type of marker so that when someone hoardes a large number of guns in one space, the authorities would be notified that someone is getting ready for an attack.

Ok, there will always be foreign guns that won't have the trackers, but it would slow people like this guy down. His guns were legal.

That should be acceptable to the majority of owners who have 1 or 2, and it would set apart the lunatics who are loading up for a large event.

Large concentrations could be detected by satellite and authorities would be able to anticipate a ramp-up.

Wonder if anyone has thought of that before?

44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Possible solution: Load guns with trackers so stockpiles can be detected by satellite (Original Post) lindysalsagal Dec 2015 OP
there are hundreds of millions of privately-owned guns in the USA 0rganism Dec 2015 #1
GPS drain batteries quickly Travis_0004 Dec 2015 #2
Exactly. GPS is not magic. backscatter712 Dec 2015 #19
GPS doesn't even fit the bill. Jesus Malverde Dec 2015 #27
No battery charge. no work Jim Beard Dec 2015 #33
I thought of it, too. But that would take laws and our lawmakers don't care valerief Dec 2015 #3
Ammo can be created now. Travis_0004 Dec 2015 #5
If you are referencing yesterday's shootings, Snobblevitch Dec 2015 #4
Or, mark the firing pin with a number that gives every fired bullet Pathwalker Dec 2015 #6
After a couple hundred rounds, Snobblevitch Dec 2015 #9
Do you propose to ban files as well? virginia mountainman Dec 2015 #15
Wouldn't a criminal sand it down? Travis_0004 Dec 2015 #21
They can, and they already do, make them so the gun won't fire Pathwalker Dec 2015 #22
How do you propose that Travis_0004 Dec 2015 #23
why do you think it would only be 1mm? Pathwalker Dec 2015 #24
If I was a criminal I might support the law Travis_0004 Dec 2015 #25
It doesn't mark a bullet. Jesus Malverde Dec 2015 #32
A Machinist Could Just Make ozone82 Dec 2015 #43
I have a couple gun safes with firearms. To some I'm sure they would call that hoarding. They Waldorf Dec 2015 #7
Well, I'll bet folks like Zimmerman, Dunn, Reeves, etc, all said something similar the day before Hoyt Dec 2015 #8
WTF? I support the gun industry? Since when? Pathwalker Dec 2015 #10
I think you made a mistake. Snobblevitch Dec 2015 #12
Did I respond to you? Hoyt Dec 2015 #13
I think he responded to you. Snobblevitch Dec 2015 #18
The people you described, and ones who think like them, what percentage do you think they make up Waldorf Dec 2015 #11
Waldorf, gunners are far more likely to shoot people than the 200 million who aren't Hoyt Dec 2015 #16
Jeebus Hoyt, GGJohn Dec 2015 #31
You'd alert on me if I used your name. Hoyt Dec 2015 #34
No I wouldn't. GGJohn Dec 2015 #36
What are your targets at the range? Jim Beard Dec 2015 #35
Usually something like these. Waldorf Dec 2015 #40
hopefully some day guns will be as common as ash trays olddots Dec 2015 #14
True. Then we will have phasers. Waldorf Dec 2015 #17
Fuck yeah! Phasers! You have: stun, maximum stun, kill, or Glassunion Dec 2015 #28
Look at the positives. It will free up all the landfill space as I can just vaporize the trash. Waldorf Dec 2015 #29
Sooner or later, probably later, after we have a disaster that kills hundreds... backscatter712 Dec 2015 #20
We came to our senses despite the right wing, on nuclear reduction. Jim Beard Dec 2015 #37
It only takes a few guns to do this shit. The_Casual_Observer Dec 2015 #26
You have a point. Glassunion Dec 2015 #30
A maniac can only carry a couple of guns at once. Once they start killing it doesn't take very long The_Casual_Observer Dec 2015 #44
Wouldn't that be an illegal search hardluck Dec 2015 #38
They do the thermal imaging all the time in the winter looking for homes growing Marijuana Jim Beard Dec 2015 #41
Such thermal imaging is a search requiring a warrant - Kyllo v. U.S., 533 U.S. 27 hardluck Dec 2015 #42
I own guns but I really not need them Jim Beard Dec 2015 #39

0rganism

(23,973 posts)
1. there are hundreds of millions of privately-owned guns in the USA
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 07:13 PM
Dec 2015

getting "trackers" put in them would be prohibitively difficult.

putting such devices in new firearms purchases might help but only for a smallish fraction.

now finding a way to track the ammo, that might work out.

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
2. GPS drain batteries quickly
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 07:17 PM
Dec 2015

You could probably get the battery to last 1 week.

Lets hope the criminals dont forget to charge their batteries.

Also. What defines a stockpile. Lots of mass shooters use 2-3 guns, or less. Are you going to call the police when 3 guns are together.

I guess I wont be carpooling with my friends to the shooting range anymore.

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
19. Exactly. GPS is not magic.
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 08:12 PM
Dec 2015

GPS doesn't send a signal to the satellites. It gets signals from the satellites, and by measuring the timing differences between the signals, triangulates its location.

Then you need some way to transmit your location - a 4G cell-phone-data chip. At that point, you need a lot of power, so you'll need a beefy battery too. You're looking at a device that's most of the size of a small cell phone. And then you need a way to charge the battery so it can do its job. And good luck getting criminals to charge your tracking devices for you...

Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
27. GPS doesn't even fit the bill.
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 09:11 PM
Dec 2015

It gets a location from satellites it doesn't send the location to satellites.

The op is thinking about geo location trackers. The most common ones use cell towers and require enormous batteries to last any time to be worthwhile.

Student Says He Found FBI Tracking Device on Car
http://abcnews.go.com/US/california-student-finds-fbi-tracking-device-car/story?id=11841644

valerief

(53,235 posts)
3. I thought of it, too. But that would take laws and our lawmakers don't care
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 07:18 PM
Dec 2015

about the stockpiling of arms. They just don't give a flying fuck.

I wonder what life will be like when 3D guns and ammo can be created. The ammosexuals and terrorists will manufacture them as desired.

http://www.wired.com/2014/11/atlas-314-3-d-printed-guns-bullets/

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
5. Ammo can be created now.
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 07:20 PM
Dec 2015

I have an auto dealership that gives me lead wheel weights I melt down to make bullets.

Snobblevitch

(1,958 posts)
4. If you are referencing yesterday's shootings,
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 07:19 PM
Dec 2015

how would your system help? This couple apparently had four guns. That is not a stockpile.

Pathwalker

(6,599 posts)
6. Or, mark the firing pin with a number that gives every fired bullet
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 07:20 PM
Dec 2015

a number that tells you which gun fired it. Would make solving murders much easier. This technology already exists. No batteries required.

virginia mountainman

(5,046 posts)
15. Do you propose to ban files as well?
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 07:45 PM
Dec 2015

10 seconds with one of these $3 commonly found items, and the tip of the firing pin will be devoid of microstamping...

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
21. Wouldn't a criminal sand it down?
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 08:23 PM
Dec 2015

I can remove a firing pin from my AR-15 in about 20 seconds. I'm sure I could do it faster if I practiced. File it down, put it back in.

Pathwalker

(6,599 posts)
22. They can, and they already do, make them so the gun won't fire
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 08:44 PM
Dec 2015

if the firing pin has been tampered with. Then, we make it a felony to tamper with them. They already make these firing pins, and a law that would do that has been written (not enacted yet, sadly)- why would any law-abiding gun owner object to this? If you're not firing your gun doing something illegal, how could this possibly be an imposition? After all, it could solve/prevent a lot of murders.

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
23. How do you propose that
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 08:48 PM
Dec 2015

Sanding off 1mm is not going to cause it not to work

If its a felony to sand it down, then fire off 2,000 rounds to wear it down.

Or get a revolver. . . .

Pathwalker

(6,599 posts)
24. why do you think it would only be 1mm?
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 08:57 PM
Dec 2015

Why would any law abiding gun owner be afraid of this? Why would you NOT want your bullets to be identifiable - it's not like you're going to murder anyone with it, right?

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
25. If I was a criminal I might support the law
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 09:03 PM
Dec 2015

Go to range, pick up brass.

Spread it at crime scene, watch cops go after somebody else.

ozone82

(91 posts)
43. A Machinist Could Just Make
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 09:56 PM
Dec 2015

A new firing pin and housing. And the vast inventory of parts already out there.....

Waldorf

(654 posts)
7. I have a couple gun safes with firearms. To some I'm sure they would call that hoarding. They
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 07:21 PM
Dec 2015

are firearms that I have collected over the last 33 yrs. And enjoy shooting at the range. Where do you get the crazy idea that I'm planning an attack?

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
8. Well, I'll bet folks like Zimmerman, Dunn, Reeves, etc, all said something similar the day before
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 07:31 PM
Dec 2015

they did what they didn't think they'd do.

Fact is, if you arm up, train to shoot people, train as if you are in an urban war zone, carry a gun, and the like, you are clearly more likely to shoot someone than those who don't do that crud.

That's the problem.

And I haven't even gotten into your supporting the lethal weapons industry, where you gunz will go when you pass, etc.

Pathwalker

(6,599 posts)
10. WTF? I support the gun industry? Since when?
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 07:38 PM
Dec 2015

I don't even own a gun, so there won't be anything to go anywhere when I pass, which won't be very long, anyway. Hope that makes you smile, jerk. Heaven forbid we use a methodology that could help solve murders, like that of a friend of mine.

Snobblevitch

(1,958 posts)
12. I think you made a mistake.
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 07:41 PM
Dec 2015

The person to whom you responded did not reply to your post.

I am sorry about what happened to your friend.

Waldorf

(654 posts)
11. The people you described, and ones who think like them, what percentage do you think they make up
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 07:40 PM
Dec 2015

of the 80-100 million gun owners in this Country? 0.00005%?

And when I pass, my gunz (as you call them) are going to my sons/younger brothers.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
16. Waldorf, gunners are far more likely to shoot people than the 200 million who aren't
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 07:46 PM
Dec 2015

enamored with lethal weapons.

Well, former NRA Pres Keene gave his son guns. His son spent 10 years in prison for shooting a motorist in a road rage incident. Fact people are going to leave guns to the kids they indoctrinated into the gun culture and all that goes with that, is not particularly comforting.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
31. Jeebus Hoyt,
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 09:31 PM
Dec 2015

just about every firearm thread, you have to bring up those names, what is it with you?

 

olddots

(10,237 posts)
14. hopefully some day guns will be as common as ash trays
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 07:45 PM
Dec 2015

"Live & learn " has been replaced with die and learn .

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
28. Fuck yeah! Phasers! You have: stun, maximum stun, kill, or
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 09:18 PM
Dec 2015

instantaneous explosive liquid-diarrhea...

I'll let you all guess what my favorite setting will be.

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
20. Sooner or later, probably later, after we have a disaster that kills hundreds...
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 08:19 PM
Dec 2015

...we'll have to come to our senses, realize that possession and use of deadly weapons shouldn't be a Constitution-enshrined right in the 21st century, and turn the safety regulation knob up.

Eventually, it'll come down to universal background checks, more complete state and federal databases for said background checks to exclude criminals, terrorists, dangerous people, when they attempt to buy weapons, removal of loopholes and requiring ALL firearms transactions to come with a background check, probably a licensing system - you want to possess a deadly weapon? You have to get a license, you have to prove you have enough skill and sense to handle the weapon safely, you have to show that you can store it safely, and you lose your guns quickly when you fuck up.

Sorry, but it's time to set aside the Second Amendment and come to the understanding that it should be a revocable privilege, not a right.

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
30. You have a point.
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 09:23 PM
Dec 2015

You hear about these sick individuals, and their almost obscene arsenal, but then they end up using only one or two out of the entire pile.

 

The_Casual_Observer

(27,742 posts)
44. A maniac can only carry a couple of guns at once. Once they start killing it doesn't take very long
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 10:41 PM
Dec 2015

Before the cops show up and end it one way or the other. However, trying to reason out why these maniacs do anything is fruitless.

hardluck

(641 posts)
38. Wouldn't that be an illegal search
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 09:39 PM
Dec 2015

in violation of the Fourth Amendment? I mean, using thermal imaging to monitor a house from a public space without a warrant in a search. I would suspect having someway of having the gun notify authorities would be, without a warrant, an illegal search.

 

Jim Beard

(2,535 posts)
41. They do the thermal imaging all the time in the winter looking for homes growing Marijuana
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 09:46 PM
Dec 2015

Use helicopters and fly over homes.

 

Jim Beard

(2,535 posts)
39. I own guns but I really not need them
Thu Dec 3, 2015, 09:43 PM
Dec 2015

I mostly just shoot jackrabbits and land destroying Prairie dogs. otherwise they will make good paper weights.

I have a cheap single shot shotgun that gets all kind of scratches in my work truck. I don't need any more shells than one because jackrabbits are so fast, it is seldom you will hit them with a second shot.

Who is such a bac shot that they need a 30 bullet magazine clip?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Possible solution: Load g...