Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Middle East is Changing, Hillary Clinton’s Policy Isn’t
http://www.niacouncil.org/the-middle-east-is-changing-hillary-clintons-policy-isnt/To her credit, Clinton supported the Iran nuclear deal before it was a foregone conclusion that it would survive in Congress. Is it perfect? Well, of course not. No agreement like this ever is, she said in September. But is it a strong agreement? Yes, it is and we absolutely should not turn it down. Clintons public support for the deal sent a clear message that it was not a bilateral transaction between President Obama and Iran instead, the deal was a multilateral agreement between seven nations that she would continue to honor if elected President.
After that, however, things get complicated. Clinton also said, This is not the start of some larger diplomatic opening and I dont see Iran as our partner in implementing this agreement. I believe Iran is the subject of the agreement. Making statements that echo Iranian hardliners is a dangerous self-fulfilling prophecy that erodes the aforementioned credit she deserves. Downplaying the possibility of a larger diplomatic opening and pretending Iran is not a partner in implementing a deal that required its approval needlessly reduces the requisite political space to make such an opening come to fruition should the opportunity present itself.
Things got even more complicated in Secretary Clintons recent speech at the Council on Foreign Relations. We cannot view Iran and ISIS as separate challenges. Regional politics are too interwoven, she said. Raising the confidence of our Arab partners and raising the cost to Iran for bad behavior will contribute more effectively to the fight against ISIS. How can Iran and ISIS be the same challenge when Iran is the only Muslim-majority country in the Middle East fighting ISIS on the ground? Perhaps more importantly, is raising the confidence of our Arab allies really the right move at a time when they are the ones financing jihadists such as ISIS?
Clinton herself has acknowledged that donors in Saudi Arabia constitute the most significant source of funding to Sunni terrorist groups worldwide. If we take new steps to raise their confidence level while they continue working against American interests, wont they be socialized into thinking this kind of behavior delivers results and they can get away with anything? Clinton acknowledges this logic but only when applied to Iran. Raising the cost to Iran for bad behavior while turning a blind eye to the unsavory behavior of our Arab allies actively reverses President Obamas important progress in re-establishing Americas role as a balancer in the Middle East.
Secretary Clinton is telling Americans that we should do more of the same in the Middle East, and that is precisely the policy prescription that helped develop al-Qaeda and ISIS in the first place. The U.S. needs to forge pragmatic, functioning relations throughout the region to maximize its flexibility and reduce security threats as they evolve. Working with a greater number of countries provides America with more leverage and better options and perhaps most importantly, it will impose a cost on countries that take U.S. support for granted.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 450 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Middle East is Changing, Hillary Clinton’s Policy Isn’t (Original Post)
eridani
Dec 2015
OP
MisterP
(23,730 posts)1. the focus on Iran is particularly noteworthy because of Clinton's personal support and intervention
in favor of a *different* death cult that's caused shootouts in the Ile-de-France and has mass graves in Iraq with calvariums surfacing from the soil
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People's_Mujahedin_of_Iran