General Discussion

malaise

(269,067 posts) Fri Dec 11, 2015, 04:58 PM Dec 2015

That's Democratic counterparts not Democrat Luke Russert

you entitled little 'pissant'. WTF was that about you idiot?

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

That's Democratic counterparts not Democrat Luke Russert (Original Post) malaise Dec 2015 OP

Context? nt No Vested Interest Dec 2015 #1

Context is actually irrelevant in this instance malaise Dec 2015 #4

Didn't see it, but +1 for the entitled little pissant. MeNMyVolt Dec 2015 #2

LOL malaise Dec 2015 #6

Now don't keep those feelings bottled up. LiberalArkie Dec 2015 #3

Hehehehehhe malaise Dec 2015 #5

I have a theory, he seems to be more dickish on Friday's rufus dog Dec 2015 #7

Interesting and malaise Dec 2015 #9

I just want to smack him upside his smirking mug. Arugula Latte Dec 2015 #8

No Vested Interest

(5,167 posts)

1. Context? nt

Reply to malaise (Original post)

Fri Dec 11, 2015, 05:30 PM

Dec 2015

malaise

(269,067 posts)

4. Context is actually irrelevant in this instance

Reply to No Vested Interest (Reply #1)

Fri Dec 11, 2015, 06:35 PM

Dec 2015

because this is about grammar and the name of a party versus ReTHUG talking points.

Democratic was required but he used Democrat because ReTHUG official policy is never to say Democratic Party.

That said he was discussing some Senate related matter.