General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCommunity Wants Atheist Santa Billboard Taken Down
http://www.fox26houston.com/news/56870608-storyThe billboard reads: "Go ahead and skip church! Just be good for goodness' sake. Happy Holidays!"...
"It is beyond disrespectful to my community and disrespectful to my beliefs," said a local resident.
It's a sign that seems out of place in a large faith-based community like Piedmont, but the New Jersey based group behind it, American Atheists, said that was part of the point.
I wonder how far this is from the town where the solar farm sucked up all the sun's energy?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017314413
DavidDvorkin
(19,485 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)The religious right have such thin skins. If other people are hurt or offended, that's just too bad. But god forbid anyone give them a taste of their own medicine.
tech3149
(4,452 posts)They just rely on playing the victim card because they don't have anything else. After that they have to assert that if you have no faith in some Bronze age religious interpretation of reality you can't have any moral or ethical standard in your behavior.
meow2u3
(24,772 posts)Not to suppress speech they don't like.
A Christian would put up a sign such as "Keep Christ in Christmas." A Christianist would push to have the atheist sign taken down. See the difference now?
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)The other thing I find strange is they get upset about nativity sets in public spaces but if ever Christian put up a nativity scene on their yard. They'd have plenty. They certainly are not smart.
meow2u3
(24,772 posts)They'd push to see the Consititution abolished before having to accept that people have religious--and non-religious--views other than their own shown to the public.
They're the ones trying to establish fundamentalist Christianity as the official religion, damn the Consitution. They'd also be very quick to throw Catholics, Orthodox Christians, and mainline Protestants in jail for not converting to their twisted version of Xtianity.
Mariana
(14,860 posts)to endorse their particular religion and their religious holidays. That's why it's so important to them to have their nativity scenes, crosses, 10 commandments plaques, or whatever displayed in public spaces. Certainly every church and every individual Christian homeowner could put a nativity scene in their front yards, and plenty of them do, but that's just not the same.
Warren Stupidity
(48,181 posts)earthside
(6,960 posts)Last year's sign.
?1
niyad
(113,551 posts)TipTok
(2,474 posts)niyad
(113,551 posts)rockfordfile
(8,704 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,361 posts)... in Republicanism.
What is a "faith-based community", anyway? Do they all rent from the Catholic church or something?
Snobblevitch
(1,958 posts)when people with beliefs contrary to their own choose to express them.
ms liberty
(8,596 posts)About an hour east from me.
tishaLA
(14,176 posts)and it's getting that kind of pearl clutching? that's disappointing
ms liberty
(8,596 posts)The Research Triangle area is Raleigh, Durham, and Chapel Hill; it is about two and a half hours east of me, and about an hour to an hour and a half east of Winston Salem.
SDJay
(1,089 posts)What about THE FREE MARKET IS ALWAYS RIGHT! Didn't someone pay real money for these billboards?
These idiots don't even seem to realize when they're chasing their own tails.
Good for the folks who put these up. I hope now more of them show up all over the place.
mnhtnbb
(31,402 posts)in an area known as the Piedmont of NC. It's a pretty right wing, conservative area.
Woodland (where the solar panel objections occurred) is east of 95 and about an hour and a half's drive from
the Outer Banks. It's very rural, conservative, and very small town compared to Winston-Salem area and not largely populated.
truegrit44
(332 posts)As a devout Atheist I really like "be good for goodness sake"! So tired of all these signs about going to hell, loving god, blah, blah, blah........this is refreshing
peabody
(445 posts)"Be good for goodness sake" says it all. I want to post it up on my Facebook page just to see what kind of replies I get from my hardcore religious friends and family members.
Bucky
(54,065 posts)it was something of a conservative meme in the 90s. This is before pouty pissypants culture took over the Republican Party
Matariki
(18,775 posts)Why can't they simply say, I don't believe in god, or life after death, or whatever it is they believe? Rather than calling other folk's beliefs 'fairy tales' or whatever?
jmowreader
(50,562 posts)niyad
(113,551 posts)reichwingnuts, who have no problem heaping scorn on other people.
whatthehey
(3,660 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)Nevernose
(13,081 posts)It didn't call anyone's beliefs fairy tales or anything else.
In general, atheists believe that other folks religious beliefs are fairy tales. So what's the problem with them sharing that belief?
Matariki
(18,775 posts)If they'd let the "Don't go to church" bit off I'd agree with you.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)Why?
Matariki
(18,775 posts)And therefore it is disingenuous to say that the message isn't intended to insult other people's religion. When clearly it is.
Why not just the "Be good for goodness' sake" and Happy Holidays and sign it American Atheists? Why direct the message specifically to Christians?
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)Nice double standard you've got there.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)You clearly didn't understand a word I wrote if that's what you took away from it.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)These signs were defaced by religious zealots who didn't like that atheists picked up litter on the highways, or that atheists even exist. I never hear tongue clucking over this type of stuff. It's always: "Those atheists are just rude and unpleasant! Why do they have to upset people by actually expressing their ideas?!"
Laffy Kat
(16,386 posts)Respectfully, turn the other cheek. Believing it is "targeting" Christians is a bit paranoid.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)Sheesh. I'm a devil worshiping satanist as far as most christians are concerned.
I simply asked why so many atheist define there beliefs in terms of deriding others', instead of simply saying they don't believe in a supernatural being or whatever.
Too many people write knee jerk responses without reading or understanding what they're responding to. Not worth the time.
Laffy Kat
(16,386 posts)I still don't get the offense, though.
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)It's not insulting anyone, it's sharing a belief in a funny, polite manner.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)Why behave like the assholes you are critical of?
NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)is if people acting nasty get the nastiness thrown back at them. Then they understand how others feel.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)And anyway, what exactly is the "message" you want to get across? That their beliefs are stupid?
If you think that you can teach people empathy that way...
NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)That's a positive message.
RedCappedBandit
(5,514 posts)that it's okay to be members of that community equivalent to threatening eternal damnation for failure to participate in the dominant culture?
These billboards target atheists living in communities where being an atheist might not be so widely accepted and are intended to reassure them that they're not alone. The implication that that is insulting to anyone is heinous.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)some people call mythology fairy tales.
leftyladyfrommo
(18,870 posts)You have every right to that opinion.
It's all opinion. No one knows anything for sure. There's no way to know.
No reason to be awful to other people who disagree with you. No reason to cram what you think down someone else's throat.
Often the anti people are just as fanatical as the pro people. It's all rude.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Even if they are fanatical. It's actually probably better to be tolerant if they are fanatical you never know with that type. They might start a war against Christmas or something.
RedCappedBandit
(5,514 posts)What, specifically, is insulting about this billboard?
Yeah, just be good for goodness' sake. What a terrible idea. I can see why you would feel insulted by that.
You realize that, as atheists, our perception is that religious beliefs are myths? Should I feel insulted that you don't believe the same things I believe? Why do you think I'M wrong? How dare you?
leftyladyfrommo
(18,870 posts)Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)instead of saying "this particular loony version of a supernatural realm is OBVIOUSLY the real deal!" from the get-go. Where is the evidence for supernatural phenomena and supernatural beings? Why assume something is there based on zero evidence?
leftyladyfrommo
(18,870 posts)I don't really belive in having opinions on anything.
We just dwell in emptyness. It's nice there.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)leftyladyfrommo
(18,870 posts)I haven't really run into that with the mainstream churches like the Methodists or Presbyterians or Episcopalian or Lutheran churches. And I have lots of Catholic friends who aren't radical at all. I have known lots of really nice people who are pretty religious.
But living in the Bible Belt I am familiar with the zealots and they can be very unpleasant. I just ignore them. It's their right to believe whatever they want but I choose not to listen to it. And they are a rather small minority but they make a lot of noise. I just refuse to talk about anything religious with them. So we get along ok.
And nobody knows anything about Zen so they just leave me alone. Which is fine. Zen people are all kind of loners anyway. I really believe that mystics are just born that way. You either understand it or you don't.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)When teenagers and young adults realize that, yeah, it is pretty silly what they have been "taught" they tend to stray away from it.
In 300 years the religious, at least in Western society, will be a small but loud fundy segment of society.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)I've come to realize that mocking other people's religion doesn't make the world a better place. It isn't a respectful way to go through life.
I notice many of the replies to my post justify being dickish to people is because 'they did it first'. Can't think of anything much more childish than that.
I'm neither a christian or an atheist but can respect that people find their truth and meaning from either. I'm just curious about what I'd call 'fundamentalist atheists'. They seem the define themselves more by their scorn for others than their own core beliefs.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)I think extraordinary claims require large amounts of verifiable evidence. When you give respect it is tantamount to giving acceptance and justification to those extraordinary beliefs.
Regardless of our thoughts, it is working. This YouTube channel has over 76 million views because of greatness like this.
"The end is greatness "
If God Played Minecraft
Matariki
(18,775 posts)Because that's pretty dickish.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Like the Kracken in Clash of the Titans
brooklynite
(94,727 posts)A guy people believe in without evidence of his existence, who magically travels around the world visiting every home in a single night, and who punishes or rewards based on his own standards of behavior.
Doesn't sound atheist to me...
TipTok
(2,474 posts)... and no one tries to create law and policy, that the rest of us are obligated to follow, based on what puts folks in the nice or naughty category.
brooklynite
(94,727 posts)I'm telling you why
TipTok
(2,474 posts)... and putting you on the no-fly list.
JHB
(37,161 posts)Answer that question and you answer your own: because atheists, being people, come with all sorts of personalities, just like everyone else. Including the parts where some feel the need to jab at some who jab at them, and a few who are just assholes.
You don't notice those of us atheists who already do pretty much what you ask, because there's nothing to draw notice.
I wonder if those signs are there because the area is home base for a particularly belligerent church or group.
lindysalsagal
(20,730 posts)Right up there with Elves, Santa, unicorns, Leprechauns, the Loch Ness Monster and the Tooth Fairy.
And these fairy tales cause real suffering in the world.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)Why can't they simply say, I don't believe in atheism, or anti-afterlifeism, or whatever it is they believe? Rather than calling other folks' beliefs wrong or implying that they will burn in hell or that they're anti-American or whatever?
callous taoboy
(4,588 posts)My character in this small town has been much-maligned because I am a perceived non-believer. So anyone offended by that billboard, I say get over it.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)Is it insulting to suggest that church attendance be optional?
justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)isn't an atheists tendency to be vocal about what we think of religion, it's that theists see our outspokenness as an affront to their beliefs. It's not insulting to say we think that the Bible is a great work of fiction that was (and is) used for controlling the masses through fear or that people shouldn't believe in fairy tales. It's an opinion that people don't like to hear, so therefore, they label it insulting.
As an atheist, I'm happy for you to believe (or not believe) whatever you'd like but keep in mind, that to some of us that come from religious backgrounds, see the theist community filled with pride, vanity and hypocrisy when it comes to their religious beliefs. According to the Bible, one should not be boastful about their religious beliefs because it's tied up in those very sins: vanity, pride and often hypocrisy. I'm using words straight from the Bible by the way, so when we see this and point it out, though we're atheists, we're actually being good theists (according to the Bible). Again, that's not insulting, it's being honest about what we see or have been taught in our previous lives as theists.
I know not all theists are assholes, just like not all atheists are assholes but people like to put things in boxes, so that being said, most theists will always be assholes to some and most atheists will always be assholes to others.
I think whining about one group putting another group down without acknowledging that it's a two-way street is tiring, and I for one, have grown weary of seeing the "why do atheists have to insult people" meme when what we're really doing is putting down a book that should be no more sacred than any other book, IMO. So yeah, everyone insults everyone in some way, two wrongs don't make a right but atheists aren't the only one's being assholes (according to your statement).
niyad
(113,551 posts)here, they can have some of my special smelling salts.
oooooppsss--that was the vial with the pepper juice in it!
Initech
(100,101 posts)Egnever
(21,506 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,361 posts)Before the adoption of papyrus and parchment, the Rigveda, Torah, Bible, and Koran were all written as graffiti on rocks by the road side. You had to go on a day's walk just to finish a chapter. If it's not in letters at least a foot high, it's not holy scripture. Just ask the prophet Burma-Shave (i mean, a name like that must be religious, mustn't it?)
Iggo
(47,565 posts)Thanks for that excellent information!
anoNY42
(670 posts)The Burma-Shave remark is offensive to those who prefer to call it "Myanmar"...
dmr
(28,349 posts)Orrex
(63,224 posts)Those who insist that atheism is a religion understand neither atheism nor religion.
Iggo
(47,565 posts)Orrex
(63,224 posts)Atheism is a religion like the lack of measles is a disease.
Indeed, it goes right over their heads.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Creative, though unsupported allegation... like a bumper-sticker sans wit.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)people should be able to freely express their beliefs.
It astounds me.
Egnever
(21,506 posts)Was that a response to my post?
I don't think I mentioned anyone being able to express their beliefs.
ronnie624
(5,764 posts)The fundamentalist who commented in the article wants to silence atheists, and then you post a comment criticizing them also, seemingly expressing solidarity with her. Why would anyone think you didn't agree with her?
Egnever
(21,506 posts)Why would I bother? Useless information.
The sign says enough. Now the atheists need to group together to get their hate on as well. Looks a lot like a religion to me.
ronnie624
(5,764 posts)And expressing doubt about religious doctrine is not 'hate'.
Can't you see the lack of logic in your comments?
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)Santa is a religious figure. The religion is consumerism. New Atheism distinguishes itself by its acceptance of everything in the dominant ideology other than God-based religion. Big fucking deal. Like New Atheism the billboard is trivial minded and reactionary, it's just there to troll fundamentalists.
How about Galileo? Or Marx? Or anything other than a Coca-Cola advertisement ca. 1914?
anoNY42
(670 posts)"How about Galileo? Or Marx? Or anything other than a Coca-Cola advertisement ca. 1914?"
Because these atheists know their audience. This is a conservative, religious area, so they just wouldn't understand who Galileo or Marx was. But they understand Santa, since he is basically the same as the Sky Fairy they worship.
Iggo
(47,565 posts)Keep equating Santa with God, Santa with God, Santa with God.
Then when the kids realize there's no Santa...
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)Iggo
(47,565 posts)Thankfully.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)have been saved! Hallelujah!
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)The billboard trolls fundamentalists with a triviality. (Who says church is necessarily a bad thing, by the way? Something that New Atheists do not understand from their position of privilege at all - that people want community.)
Ahem, as I was saying: The billboard cannot possibly win over fundamentalists. It is designed to troll them and prompt them to react, so as to produce headlines and responses back in the neighborhoods of the New Atheists, so that they can feel smug as though they did something that matters.
Why are they telling people to skip church (where their friends may be) as opposed to making a logical or doctrinal point about the dangers of fanatical irrational belief? Do you see the difference? This is just insulting the people for being stupid - a form of ad hominem. It doesn't make an argument against what they believe.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,361 posts)There are also people who have a vague relation to Christianity, who are the kind of people who won't go to church often, but turn up when they feel "they ought to". So this advert is suggesting to them that attendance is not only not mandatory, it's not a part of being 'good' either - you can work out what you think is 'good' without a preacher telling you, or the disapproval of your neighbours for not turning up at church implying you've done something wrong.
if you start from the assumption that atheists are trolls, and therefore their audience must be the people who would be most offended by a message, you're just going to see trolling, and you'll end up seeing the whole message as insulting, because that's what you expect from a troll. But that is, ironically, an ad hominem. You're arguing that because it's atheists saying it, it must be insulting.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)Being one myself, at least with regard to sentient single-entity planner-creators of everything, and knowing a great many otherwise.
I have developed a particular set of observations about the counterproductive, narrow New Atheist schtick, however, mostly from first-hand experience of going to a bunch of NA-inflected atheist meetings some years ago in New York. Mostly likable people (unlike, say their matinee idols, Harris, Hitchens and Maar) and not bad as drinking partners. Tend to be on the autistic-libertarian-idealist side of things, not that I mind too much. Their PR sense is certainly terrible, as with the series of Santa ads, and they're willing to pander to nationalism, as with the campaign to get "under God" out of the Pledge of Allegiance. (The only credible and consistent position with regard to Pledges of Allegiance is that the entire text should be struck and forgotten as a quasi-totalitarian relic.) The worldview is too narrow. It's not enough to make a drama out of rejecting non-natural gods and pretend this is the first solution to the ills of the world.
rockfordfile
(8,704 posts)Your made up crap is so weak that a billboard has you going ape bunkers.
JackRiddler
(24,979 posts)Thank you for illustrating a high level of relevant argument. No doubt this is exactly the pitch that will win things for New Atheism over fundamentalists. I promise not to "make up" anything again, such as that the New Atheists use Santa for their campaign and don't address questions of belief in it.
It's "bonkers," by the way, not bunkers, and it's either "ape shit" or "bonkers," not "ape bonkers."
lindysalsagal
(20,730 posts)the official religious party line: Everyone already accepts that Santa isn't real, but the truth is, he knows that goodness, in and of itself, is the higher morality.
With religion, there's always that nasty secondary consequence, you know, heaven, hell, etc. Santa knows that goodness is it's own best reason, not some other secondary result, like getting presents from your parents.....
Scuba
(53,475 posts)BlueJazz
(25,348 posts)Lousy drivers, slow-ass people at the grocery store and a cornucopia of other stuff. My feelings get hurt 10 times a day. It's called life.
leeroysphitz
(10,462 posts)Facility Inspector
(615 posts)Jesus was born in the summer.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)the sign of Pisces, hence, the Piscean age (to be followed by the Age of Aquarius, Age of Aquarius...)
anoNY42
(670 posts)Facility Inspector
(615 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Acculturation is the reason...
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Vinca
(50,303 posts)Christmas is 99.9% Santa and gift buying. I bet there is a good chunk of the population that can't even tell you what it's supposed to be celebrating.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)But opted to be insulting jerks instead.
Technically, I am an athiest. But I sure as heck don't identify with the majority of those who call themselves that.
Immature. Like adolescents needing to "get even".
HEY, they were obnoxious first
.
Which is essentially what almost every post on this thread has said so far.
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)The South is full of religious billboards threatening condemnation, scaring poor pregnant girls, and ...
How is "skip church and just be good" an insult?
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)Telling people to just "skip church", which is a meaningful practice for many who are both liberal and conservative, is insulting.
And it's very telling so many atheists seem incapable of expressing themselves in a positive manner. It's mostly a philosophical weakness, I suppose.
JHB
(37,161 posts)If you only notice when there's some kerfluffle, don't you only notice people involved with it? How do you notice people not involved in the kerfluffle?
snooper2
(30,151 posts)We can all enjoy it together and discuss!
anoNY42
(670 posts)"Too bad they couldn't put up a positive statement about their beliefs"
Too bad they don't have "beliefs", which means there is nothing they could put on that sign that would satisfy you.
Or, to argue in the alternative, perhaps their belief is that one should be "good for goodness sake". That sounds pretty inoffensive, if you ask me. Much better than the idea that being good gets you into heaven (which means that all of your charity is really not so selfless after all)...
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)The exceptions are those with an extremely low IQ.
So again, it seems many atheists are intelligent but not philosophically well rounded.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,361 posts)You've rejected it as a positive worldview. Why is saying it a sign they are "not philosophically well rounded"?
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)Edit- and we both know according to human psychology that telling people NOT to do something almost never works and is counter-productive. It causes a defensive reaction.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,361 posts)Why is "be good for goodness' sake" not positive?
"telling people NOT to do something almost never works and is counter-productive. It causes a defensive reaction. "
Have you counted the number of "do not"s in the Ten Commandments? Or, to be more seasonal, is "fear not: for, behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people" a counter-productive message that would have caused shepherds to be afraid? Just like the billboard message, that is "don't do that - do this instead".
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)so besides telling people not to go to church
they are saying "just be good for goodness sake" which is as OPPOSED to Christians, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, Jains, Sikkhs being good as part of a moral code.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,361 posts)The given reason is slightly different - idealistic rather than supernatural - but it's pretty close. Are you saying you think that a moral code needs a supernatural reason to be 'positive'?
hatrack
(59,592 posts).
The2ndWheel
(7,947 posts)The skip church part. I imagine that would be the negative aspect of it, from the point of view of those that go to church.
Then again, even if the billboard said "Merry Christmas from the atheists", people could see that as mocking, because it wouldn't be thought of as sincere. Then there's the Christians that force Christmas on everyone. And round and round we go.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)I wish the christians could keep it to one or two days. Or perhaps I mean the capitalists. I also think the American Atheists could make their message a little less outwardly focused.
RedCappedBandit
(5,514 posts)Laffy Kat
(16,386 posts)There is absolutely nothing obnoxious about the sentiment. Be good without the fear of going to hell? That offends you?
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)So much of the interstates in the South are dotted with billboards for Asian massage parlors, adult toy stores, anti abortion groups, and miscellaneous out of context bible verses.
It's a positive message, just be good. How is that horrible?
Mariana
(14,860 posts)Amazing the knots people will twist themselves into so they can feel persecuted.
Pretty much every billboard is telling you to do or not do something. Shop at this store. Eat at this restaurant. Buy this product. Use this service. Don't drive drunk. Go to this church. Don't have an abortion. But this particular one is "insulting".
The2ndWheel
(7,947 posts)Actually, any difference in any society will be contentious. Diversity is inefficient.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Let's say the atheists put up a similar sign but in a predominately Muslim neighborhood with the same message, but suggesting skipping going to the mosque as opposed to going to church.
Perhaps the sign could go up during Ramadan.
And there was an image of, let's say, Mohammed, presenting that message.
How would that go over?
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)In the United States, not so much.
Maybe an atheist group in, let's say, Egypt ought to give it a go.
rockfordfile
(8,704 posts)Well religion is a scam. It's just that where we live the Christian religionscam is the dominate religionscam.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)But zinging some of the other religions in a similar way ought to be kosher too.
But Christians are the overwhelming majority in the US, and certainly in this part of NC. It's reasonable to choose to present the message to them.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)But do you think it would be reasonable to present a similar message to Muslims in a part of the US that has a large Muslim population? Or do you think that because Muslims are a minority in the US that it would not be appropriate to do so for that reason?
Mariana
(14,860 posts)Maybe it's already been done. But most billboards aren't aimed at just the immediate neighborhood, they're on major roads so many people from all around can see them.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)But it's a fairly narrow swath of people who would be driving on Business Route 40 in Kernersville, NC.
I think a similar billboard directed at going to the mosque rather than to church, placed in, let's say Dearborn, MI would result in a different kind of discussion (And perhaps justifiably so).
Mariana
(14,860 posts)It wasn't in Dearborn, but it was certainly meant for Muslims as well as Christians.
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-758697
So you see, it has been done.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)They had a similar one directed at Jewish people at the time also:
http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2012/03/01/atheist-group-targets-muslims-jews-with-myth-billboards-in-arabic-and-hebrew/
What's your take on the whole thing? Do you think all are equally valid? Or do you think such things ought to be directed at Christians only since they are the dominant power in the US?
Mariana
(14,860 posts)Honestly, I'm not bothered about where they choose to place their ads, or which particular population they are trying to reach. I really don't get why you're going on and on about it.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Sorry about the redundancy!
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)To date, no one has provided a satisfactory answer as to why this is offensive. So the billboard says don't go to church, or don't go to mosque. Has it occurred to you that, perhaps, there are people in church or people in mosque who would really prefer to be somewhere else?
Is Ramadan a federal holiday? Is Ramadan season accompanied by a set of associated secular traditions? No? Well, okay, then.
Now this is an interesting proposition.
Are you suggesting Santa Claus is, in Christianity, a figure of importance akin to Mohammed in the Muslim tradition? Or are you suggesting Mohammed is, in Islam, a figure of importance akin to Santa Claus in the Christian tradition?
I don't think you're going to win many friends in either camp with that one, buddy.
H2O Man
(73,605 posts)American-born member of the Founding Fathers who is recognized by all of the world's religious faiths and political theologies. You need to read a comic book or two, before attempting to discredit him.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)If you are an atheist and can't define your beliefs without it being about what other people believe, your thinking is shallow. If your atheism is about mocking other people's religions, then you are not only shallow, but also a jerk.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,361 posts)and neither is "skip church", for that matter. That's suggesting that people don't take part in a public ceremony, which some people feel pressured to do so, even though it doesn't mean anything to them (by family or neighbours).
Why is it that you are throwing around the words 'jerk', 'asshole' and 'shallow' about atheists, but you are the one complaining about atheists being disrespectful?
Matariki
(18,775 posts)My criticism was directed at people who think that mocking other people's beliefs is acceptable, not at atheists. I would have thought that was clear, apparently not. Coercing and pushing one's beliefs on others is something fundamentalists do.
Second, the "skip church" part clearly makes it about what other people believe and value - specifically Christians. It makes it very clear that the billboard isn't about the very worthy atheist message (that morality and decent behavior is better when motivated for it's own sake than a fear of punishment) but instead makes it a dig at Christians. I only ask why that part is necessary. If you bother reading what I wrote, you'll notice that I didn't attack atheists for their beliefs. I simply asked why some atheists tend to define their beliefs only through mocking other people's religions.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,361 posts)It's suggesting that there's no need to go to church. You can find some Christians who think that too.
Matariki
(18,775 posts)I was referring mostly to the "skip church, I'm too old for fairy tales" message in the image that Earthside posted. It's obvious that the message is a poke at christians, and it seems gratuitously petty. I find it amusing that suggesting respect for other people's beliefs is met with doubling down on the disrespect. Not you, just a lot of responses in this thread. So anyway, I'm done with this.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)I'll ask you the same question: has it occurred to you that some people sitting in church don't really want to be there?
oberliner
(58,724 posts)I was seriously wondering if a billboard suggesting that people not go to the mosque on a Muslim holiday and instead just be good to one another would engender a similar response as this one encouraging people not to go to church on Christmas.
I don't think that it would - but I could be wrong.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)not sure what's wrong with the message.
In fact, most of the Atheist billboards are callings to closet atheists and other non-believers to stop pretending to believe for society's sake.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)It might be helpful to those individuals to get the message out in those communities as well, where, potentially, people also feel a lot of pressure to believe for the sake of their community.
Mariana
(14,860 posts)If you think there should be more atheist billboards in Muslim neighborhoods, by all means go raise the money, rent the space and have them put up.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)I thought that this was an interesting topic to discuss.
I don't want to put up any billboards and I am not in the least bit obsessed. I was just curious to hear different perspectives on this question that I find somewhat thought-provoking.
Thoughtful discussion is what I like most about DU.
JI7
(89,264 posts)Would be offended if it referred to Muslims instead.
Solly Mack
(90,785 posts)Warpy
(111,338 posts)and are terrified the neighbors are going to think they're atheists.
ieoeja
(9,748 posts)Part 1 of 2: an explanation for my fellow Atheists.
They were trying to decide: do we tell young children that Santa is not real, or that he was just a nice person?
Most common reply by Atheists to, "when did you stop believing in God," is, "same time as I stopped believing in Santa Claus." Christians have heard this so many times they now realize that Santa is a problem. So they feel the need to break the Santa Claus news early while the children are still young enough to trust their parents unquestionably.
One of those family members still ran into the problem as her son immediately started questioning his belief in Jesus when she told him Santa was not real. She was the one who started the thread looking for ways to explain the difference. Apparently, there are several books out there on how to do this as other relatives recommended a few.
This billboard ties the two together just when Christians combat that tie. So while there is absolutely nothing remotely insulting about this billboard, it pisses off Christians. And some seem to define "insult" as "that which pisses me off".
With great difficulty I refrained from commenting in the Facebook thread that maybe she should think about what her 5 year old was telling her instead of just dismissing his comments.
--------------------------------------
Part 2 of 2: a Christian message from an Atheist friend because you guys seem to have difficulty dealing with these issues.
How to explain this billboard to your children:
The philosophy taught in the New Testament does not merely call for people to "do" good. It calls for people to "be" good. Jesus wants you to be genuinely good. This billboard is emphasing that going to church is not enough. You need to be good at heart.
It is like the man who kills another man because he can legally kill him, but he does not have to. Is that man good? No. He chose to kill someone he did not have to. He may not be a criminal, but he is unquestionably a bad person.
That, or ask yourself, "which is worse, a 5 year old thinking about it or you not thinking about it?"
LeftishBrit
(41,210 posts)why don't they put up one of their own, exhorting people to attend church at Christmas, rather than demand that other people avoid putting up signs that disagree with them?
They have a right to their views, but not to suppress other people's free speech.
Mariana
(14,860 posts)that exhort people to attend church that yet another one wouldn't draw any attention!
Democat
(11,617 posts)And anyone who doesn't agree should shut up?
jeff47
(26,549 posts)The "insult" is that someone dared to put up a billboard that did not threaten me with eternal torture.
Sivart
(325 posts).....Axial tilt.
I'm just saying.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Heathen!