General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSweet Christ what is Kim Davis wearing?
Watching the SOTU and suddenly I thought my cable was doing that crazy pixelation thing and then I realized it was Kim Davis' outfit.
avebury
(10,952 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)But what on earth is that outfit?????
complain jane
(4,302 posts)holier-than-though nonsense just begs for it.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Siwsan
(26,272 posts)So she wore them all.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)tishaLA
(14,176 posts)oh, and a cross.
And no conditioner for her hair.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)sdfernando
(4,935 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Disrespectful. She would have worn sequins if it was someone she actually liked, lol.
sdfernando
(4,935 posts)Munificence
(493 posts)that she should be a good female and make herself up for the "men" to look all pretty?
Politics aside I kind of admire people that don't give a fuck about what they look like. They are not hung up on being a "movie star". And I like to see it chap simple minded folks ass who object by belittling them and making fun of them...I thought this was supposed to be a liberal leaning site?
And I'll go ahead and apologize if you are only in the 7th grade as I am thinking by the time you hit high school that you'll grow out of needing to put people down based on their appearance. But then again, some folks never grow out of it.
Now it's time to look at the rest of the thread and use the ignore button a bit more on any judgmental assholes I see. I surely hope that by the time I am done that I can see at least a few replies besides for my own...but I am not holding my breath.
PasadenaTrudy
(3,998 posts)Glamrock
(11,802 posts)She's a bigot and an asshole so, yeah, some of us will absolutely take the low road and have some laughs at her expense. You wanna double down and call me a 7th grader? That's cool. Couldn't care less. What do you think she had to say about the president after the SOTU? If youre gonna trample people's rights because of your bigotry, you don't deserve respect.
In solidarity.....
Munificence
(493 posts)for admitting to taking the "low road"...at least you are man/woman enough to admit it. Gets my respect. But I damn sure don't approve of it. Its' childish and classless.
Glamrock
(11,802 posts)We may all strive to be perfect, but few of us succeed.
As far as the props go.....
Maru Kitteh
(28,341 posts)and what consenting adults in love do with them is childish and classless; as Ms. Davis is.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)No doubt, you said the same of Ms. Davis herself when she was busy denying equal rights. If not, I'm certain you''ll allege it as such regardless...
jmowreader
(50,560 posts)Munificence
(493 posts)church in my life 2-3 times outside of funerals and weddings so I would not know that. With that said, notice you used the word "makeup"....as in "fake", as in trying to make yourself look pretty for others....foolish. But I can see why so many have to do it as they will be judged by others and belittled.
I guess it's been pounded into the heads of females that they must look their best in order to find "the best" partner that they can and we as a society have a hard time growing out of it.
Women "burned their bras" years ago, maybe they'll burn their makeup in the future.
jmowreader
(50,560 posts)you know, lipstick and the like. The Pentecostal churches - of which there are many different denominations, one of which counts Kim Davis as a member - generally all adhere to a passage in the Book of Timothy that says women aren't to adorn themselves.
I know a lot of women who wear makeup (and quite a few who don't) and the ones who do, wear it because THEY like it.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"Women "burned their bras" years ago, maybe they'll burn their makeup in the future...."
Odd you keep it specific to only females-- as males engage in habits of vanity in the same amount, if not the same format as women do. Odd that everything you said can be applied to all sexes equally, yet you maintain a specificity to women alone.
However, as it applies to males, I suspect a creative rationalization will make itself know, justifying the unnecessary desire of shaving or (again, unnecessary) cutting one's hair every few months rather than allowing it to grow naturally for life.
Welcome back to DU, btw!!!
Maru Kitteh
(28,341 posts)in time to realize this woman was HOPING to be noticed. That's why people go to these things you know. Mission Accomplished. TM
complain jane
(4,302 posts)ohheckyeah
(9,314 posts)While shaking your finger at other posters.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)is just good manners. If you don't know what is appropriate, ask someone, for Pete's sake.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)formal wear is expected.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,513 posts)Thank you. Somebody else had that thought too:
Civilities: Stop taunting Kim Davis about her looks. Her hypocrisy is another thing.
She can wear anything she wants, as long she does her job. Isn't that our goal?
B Calm
(28,762 posts)bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)CurtEastPoint
(18,652 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)tabasco
(22,974 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)renate
(13,776 posts)But she makes a good salary, as we learned during her 15 minutes, and I'm not trying to be snotty (since I shop at thrift stores almost exclusively) when I say that she could have gotten something perfectly appropriate at Goodwill for $20. Wearing an everyday sweater (its hideousness aside) seems disrespectful for an occasion like this.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)What is disappointing in the outfit is that she disrespected the chambers and everyone in it. She didn't spend five seconds trying to look appropriate even using thrift stores which are awesome.
Munificence
(493 posts)appropriate mean?
haele
(12,660 posts)Look, I'm overweight and I can often look like a potato sack, but I can still look appropriate for a SOTU simply by wearing what I normally wear to work - in a pair of comfortable shoes, clean and pressed slacks, with a nice blouse and scarf (perhaps a casual suit jacket) - without wearing make-up and with my hair simply brushed and maybe dressed up in a braided chignon. Appropriate for a government affair is the same as looking appropriate for a professional job. Ten minutes worth of "work" to not look like I just ran to the event after finishing up a 3 hour shopping run at the mall and trying to find a place to park because I spent time at Kohls looking for a last minute birthday present for the office baby-shower tomorrow.
I make less than Kim Davis and live in California - where the cost of living is higher. And I can easily fall under the same stereotype that Kim Davis does - an older, lumpy, hard-working woman in glasses with poor teeth and work-damaged hands who buys clothes for their utility, doesn't wear make-up, lives in a double-wide trailer with four cats, a grandchild and a disabled spouse who isn't working.
The only difference between me and her on the surface is that I don't hide any personal fears or nastiness behind a religious façade.
As casual as I am, I still would respect myself and my hosts enough never go to an event like that looking the way she did. Hell, I wouldn't let myself be blackmailed into going to a boring office social get-together looking the way she did.
Sorry if it sounds shallow, but there it is. Clean and Neat is always the default for appropriate for a professional, be they man or woman.
Haele
fleur-de-lisa
(14,627 posts)Agree with every word you wrote!
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Dictionaries are both available and convenient. Might I suggest you use one if your grasp of simple English is far too elusive to have knowledge of the simple and the basic...?
Punkingal
(9,522 posts)Kingofalldems
(38,460 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)Did she behave herself after she got there?
Orrex
(63,216 posts)And not everyone can go to the SOTU, either. Since the trip was no doubt paid for by her salivating sponsors, it seems clear that someone made the conscious choice to deploy her in an outfit that wouldn't count as "business casual."
Given her salary, we can dismiss outright any bullshit speculation about her poverty. If she can't dress like a grown-up, then she should watch the proceedings from a monitor in the kiddie room.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Who specifically implied everyone can afford to shop at Nordstrom's? Or was that merely a point you wanted to argue against but were never given the opportunity to do so, hence you simply made it up as such. I used to do that too...
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Another thing is making fun of people for what they wear is kinda juvenile. One woman notin agreement out of a hundred attendees is not a big deal. There were a wide variety of liberals at that SOTU and one former Democratic Party member turned Repug. Big whoop!
trueblue2007
(17,228 posts)backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Kim Davis's facial expressions match her demeanor. She's as nasty as she looks.
Grumpy Cat has the feline equivalent of "bitchy resting face", and is apparently actually a sweetheart of a cat.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)that's the first thing my brother said about her.
Warpy
(111,282 posts)I'm no snappy dresser, since if I tried to dress for success I'd be assured of failure, I chose a profession that featured uniforms. However, even I would have made a stop at Hecht's for something a little more appropriate than my favorite shopping at Walmart outfit.
She did, however, look consistently disapproving. It's why she was invited. She does it so well.
.
shanti
(21,675 posts)they sell some pretty nice stuff, designer even. that outfit is neither.
derby378
(30,252 posts)Mira
(22,380 posts)because she has nothing else to offer to make her interesting
Blue Owl
(50,435 posts)justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)Or was it macramé?
More bothersome than her clothes is that she looks like she has absolutely no joy in her life and I speak from a place where I battle depression daily.
LuvNewcastle
(16,847 posts)That's what I dislike the most about people like her.
tavernier
(12,393 posts)Did anyone get a pic?
starroute
(12,977 posts)lpbk2713
(42,760 posts)I hate to appear judgemental ...
so I won't say anything.
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)The jet black mullet is another story.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)Glamrock
(11,802 posts)It's Joe Dirt's mom!
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)the poor dumb ass doesn't have a coat. She looks like she always does every time I've seen her. I don't think she went to show off her wardrobe. I'm glad she left her boom boom stick at home. Has she showed up in Oregon yet?
progressoid
(49,991 posts)Of the many complaints to have about her, her clothing choice is at the bottom of the list.
immoderate
(20,885 posts)--imm
progressoid
(49,991 posts)This shouldn't even be an issue here.
immoderate
(20,885 posts)I could remark ambiguously that Kim does plain, well. But so do I.
--imm
snooper2
(30,151 posts)call fundies out the world will be a better place
progressoid
(49,991 posts)Retired teacher and union member too.
Regardless, why is her appearance worthy of scorn? Is this any different than the RW making fun of Hillary or Michelle Obama clothing or hair styles?
jmowreader
(50,560 posts)All kidding aside, you should wear a little nicer outfit than that when you're going to the State of the Union Address.
840high
(17,196 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)tammywammy
(26,582 posts)CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)The silly woman lost. Let it go and try taking the high fucking road for a change.
Addressing the comments in this thread more than the OP itself.
Hekate
(90,719 posts)I'm kind of with you -- there's no need to go on the way some people are.
Maru Kitteh
(28,341 posts)I'm pretty fucking sure she went to the SOTU address for the exact purpose of being NOTICED. She is likely running a wee low on positive cash flow since marriage equality was enacted and yet behold! the LAWD hath not smote this sinner nation as of 2340 MST.
She needs to make money, and there are many who find her a perfect spokesgirl and a useful rallying point. The perfect mixture of angry, bitter and (fake) demurely "knowing her place." It is remotely possible she picked her own clothes; but certainly those who let her in that way, knew damn well what they were doing.
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)I apologize to those I've offended. Esp you Mr Black.
elleng
(130,980 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Not that I could blame it.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Quit discriminating against same sex couples and start consulting them for what to wear to fancy gatherings.
I'm not in danger of being invited to the State of the Union speech, but I'd like to think that I'd make some kind of effort in case someone in a position of power totally loses his mind and asks me to attend.
Glorfindel
(9,730 posts)Maybe she borrowed one from her husband? Poor dowdy thing.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)Someone must have told her ixnay on the blue eyeshadow, so that's a plus.
shanti
(21,675 posts)gotta put another layer under it for modesty's sake.
kelly1mm
(4,733 posts)bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)kelly1mm
(4,733 posts)JI7
(89,252 posts)kelly1mm
(4,733 posts)JI7
(89,252 posts)Response to JI7 (Reply #50)
Post removed
JI7
(89,252 posts)is absolutely nothing about your arrogance that is "presentable".
JI7
(89,252 posts)Munificence
(493 posts)the God of "No Class".
JI7
(89,252 posts)ronnie624
(5,764 posts)Orrex
(63,216 posts)that if Scalia had shown up in Bermuda shorts and flipflops, we wouldn't be making fun of an inappropriately-dressed man instead? And what does Davis' now-abandoned political affiliation have to do with it?
People mock Kim Davis because she's a bigot and a hypocrite and a horrible person, and because she prepared for an internationally prestigious event like the last day at the outdoor rummage sale. There are many deserving people who weren't invited (or able) to attend, and you can bet that they'd have treated the event with appropriate seriousness.
Davis makes almost 2.5X the median income for her fine county, and you can bet that she hasn't paid a penny on fines or legal fees. She (or her handlers) made a conscious choice to put her in clothes inappropriate to the venue. We would equally mock a man who'd done the same, even if (gasp!) he were a Democrat.
kcdoug1
(222 posts)a shopping trip at wall-mart is in her future...
KentuckyWoman
(6,688 posts)longship
(40,416 posts)renate
(13,776 posts)rusty quoin
(6,133 posts)It was another Republican "in your face" type of thing. She is another tool, and it has gone to her head. There is nothing important about her other than boosting up the hate by the right.
They treat her like a religious leader for the time being. I guess she can tell stories to her grandchildren about how important she was.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)arthritisR_US
(7,288 posts)ladyVet
(1,587 posts)We have some religious people like that around here, and they don't look like a color-blind homeless person who has to wear all of their clothes to keep them from being stolen.
I'm fat, plain and frumpy -- and poor -- but believe me, if I were to be invited to attend the SotU address, I'd find something nice to wear. Nothing fancy. Nothing that would make me uncomfortable. But nice. Not because of what anyone would say, but out of respect.
Oh, and I'm pretty sure the thing about women not adorning themselves applies to hair color and eyebrow plucking. Just sayin'.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Which is odd because I thought Christian fundamentalists were against contraception.
Whiskeytide
(4,461 posts)... the wallpaper behind her. It's how she gets away with receiving a paycheck while not doing her job.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)allowance?
Like they did for Palin?
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)"Hey, look at that ugly cow. She's disgusting. Who'd ever like her."
She is a horribly bigoted person. Let's stick to things that matter and not how she looks/dresses/does her hair.
backscatter712
(26,355 posts)When she struts around acting like a bigoted asshole, guess what, people are going to make fun of her.
Including how she dresses.
As far as I'm concerned, it's open season.
Goblinmonger
(22,340 posts)Nice.
Empowerer
(3,900 posts)A voice of reason
olddots
(10,237 posts)A speach is supposed to be listened to .
BuelahWitch
(9,083 posts)Vinca
(50,279 posts)I don't either, but if I ever look like that feel free to smother me and hide the body.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Do people actually feel good after insulting how someone dresses?
Smh
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)People would make great sport of my garb.
Beacool
(30,250 posts)Shameful.......
The first time this hypocrite made news I wondered how she could be so religious and have married four times (twice to the same man). What kind of man marries someone like her? Then I saw a pic of her current husband and thought, nevermind............
She could at least have found something more presentable to wear to the SOTU.
complain jane
(4,302 posts)That wasn't my intention. I don't like to make fun of people either. But she's a self-righteous, self-aggrandizing, showboating hypocrite.
Her attendance was "intended to be a visible reminder that his policies have not encompassed all of American citizens and, particularly, Kim Davis with respect to religious freedom and marriage," Staver told The Associated Press. "So she's there as a visible reminder of that, his policies have actually hurt religious freedom and marriage and to encourage people to stand for these values."
Your job is your job and the church is the church and you don't get to mix the two because your hypocritical self thinks you're entitled to marry and divorce at whim but prevent gays from marrying.
So... screw Kim Davis and the sweater, scarf, knit coverup, afghan, burlap sack, 2 pot holders, sleeping bag and Bumper Bully she seemed to be wearing.
Mendocino
(7,495 posts)she chose poorly.