General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAll of Al Jazeera America's TV and digital operations have been terminated.edited
Last edited Wed Jan 13, 2016, 04:39 PM - Edit history (3)
Breaking news. All of Al Jazeera America's TV and digital operations have been terminated. @AlJazeera
FB posted by Steve Clemons
EDIT: Expanding Digital Services: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027526586
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)Here's the story. I guess I can understand the difficulties.
Bryant
ananda
(28,868 posts).. Low ratings and other problems seem to be the reasons.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Executives of Al Jazeera America (AJAM) today are holding a meeting at 2 p.m. Eastern Time to tell their employees that the company is terminating all news and digital operations in the U.S. as of April 2016, resulting in the loss of hundreds of jobs. The announcement marks a stunning and rapid collapse of what, from the start, has been a towering failure.
AJAM began when Al Jazeera purchased Current TV in late 2012 from founder Al Gore for $500 million, and the channel launched six months later. From the start, the project was beset with massive failures, from bitter internal strife and employee discrimination lawsuits to minuscule ratings and distribution failures. AJAM and Gore ended up in a protracted, embittered lawsuit with one another. Ratings were so low as to be almost unquantifiable; even by 2015, the network was averaging a tiny 30,000 viewers in prime-time and at some points had literally a zero rating in the key 25-54 demographic.
https://theintercept.com/2016/01/13/al-jazeera-america-terminates-all-tv-and-digital-operations/
elleng
(130,980 posts)I recall a bit about the Current and Gore stuff.
hunter
(38,318 posts)It's an obsolete business model.
brooklynite
(94,608 posts)People have to be willing to pay for the content. How many people here pay subscription fees to online sites vs. claim that "information should be free"?
hunter
(38,318 posts)Movies and television news are expensive to produce. Perhaps that sort of subscription model would work.
My wife and I and our adult children simply don't watch traditional television news. My wife and I do subscribe to the local newspaper (which is severely struggling), and pick up the local weekly. I don't watch any television at all. The only televisions advertising I see is posted here on DU, like the Campbell's Soup ad.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10027521893
Written news and internet radio or podcating are well within the means of middle class people in first world nations to produce.
My mom worked in radio, as an on-air personality and behind the scenes. The radio business is nothing like it was in the 'sixties and 'seventies. In college I was a reporter for the campus daily. (I write too slowly to make a career of it, and I really don't give a shit about style or grammar or building an audience )
What's the future of jounalism? I don't know.
Even the BBC has a YouTube channel.
https://www.youtube.com/user/bbcnews/videos
CrispyQ
(36,479 posts)We've found them to be much better than any of the other TV networks, including MSNBC. I'm really upset about this.
elleng
(130,980 posts)That has become increasingly untenable as the networks owner and funder, the government of Qatar, is now economically struggling due to low oil prices. The decision was made recently to terminate AJAM, which allows the network to terminate all of its cumbersome distribution contracts with cable companies, and re-launch its successful Al Jazeera English inside the U.S.'
https://theintercept.com/2016/01/13/al-jazeera-america-terminates-all-tv-and-digital-operations/
nt
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Reflects the luke-warm relations with the current Washington Administration more than operating losses and small market share.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)They flog and imprison people for being gay, including tourists and workers visiting from other countries. It's their royal family that owned this outfit.