General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsU.S. to Put 'Boots on the Ground' in Iraq to Combat ISIL.
Here we go boys and girls...
By Adam Johnson / AlterNet January 22, 2016
In an op-ed in Politico and in an appearance at Davos World Economic Forum Friday morning, Secretary of Defense Ash Carter announced the U.S. will deploy "boots on the ground" in Iraq to help local forces fight the so-called Islamic State. The policy shift is a turnaround from the Obama's White House's previous stance of not deploying combat troops in Iraq and one sure to shape the foreign policy debate in the 2016 election.
Though the U.S. military presence in Iraq has been steadily growing over the past year-and-a-half this marks the first time an express acknowledgment of ground troops has been made by a senior official. The first of such deployments will, according to Sec. Carter, be the 101st Airborne Division
"Soldiers in the storied 101st Airborne Division will soon deploy to Iraq to join the fight against ISIL," Carter wrote in Politico. "They will head there with the support of the American people and armed with a clear campaign plan to deliver the barbaric organization a lasting defeat, which I personally shared with them last week at Fort Campbell."
http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/us-put-boots-ground-iraq-combat-isil
Ash Carter's Op-ed in Politico: http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/01/ash-carter-isil-fight-213554
The storied 101st Airborne Division will soon deploy 1,800 troops to Iraq to aid in the fight against ISIL. They will head there with the support of the American people and armed with a clear campaign plan to help our allies deliver the barbaric organization a lasting defeat, which I personally shared with them last week at Fort Campbell. I also traveled to U.S. Central Command in Tampa, Florida, where I discussed the plans implementation with our top commanders. And this week I visited Paris, a city of determination and resolve, to discuss the plan with our allies.
In Paris, French Minister of Defense Jean-Yves Le Drian and I co-hosted our counterparts from Australia, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Britain. Those countries have been the biggest contributors to the counter-ISIL campaign. The military actions that the United States and our partners have taken in recent months have applied unprecedented pressure on ISIL in Iraq and Syria. In recent weeks, ISIL has lost territory, lost key leaders and even lost some of its cash and oil. We are gathering momentum on a number of fronts and are determined to put ISIL on an irreversible path to lasting defeat. Now is the time to do even more.
ISIL is a cancer that threatens to spread. And like all cancers, you cant cure the disease just by cutting out the tumor. You have to eliminate it wherever it has spread, and stop it from coming back. The coalition military campaign plan the United States has developed, and which our key allies support, focuses on three military objectives: One, destroy the ISIL parent tumor in Iraq and Syria by collapsing its two power centers in Mosul, Iraq and Raqqah, Syria. These cities constitute ISILs military, political, economic and ideological centers of gravity, which is why our plan has big arrows pointing toward both. Two, combat the emerging metastases of the ISIL tumor worldwide wherever it appears. Three, our most important mission: Protect the homeland.
elias49
(4,259 posts)TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)TM99
(8,352 posts)Well, legacies and all are important, I guess.
Mufaddal
(1,021 posts)this will be an utter disaster. Now, you might say, "Well, it will be an utter disaster either way," and you could very well be right. But without a green light from Baghdad, we will probably end up with a situation where US forces are taking on both ISIS and the Sadrists.
elias49
(4,259 posts)Abadi seems to do things his own way. Headstrong character.
Apparently he's not very happy with the way the US is dealing with ISIL.
Maybe this is supposed to be the beginning of Obama's coup de gras - 'wiping out ' ISIL and making nice with Iraq. Again.
Mufaddal
(1,021 posts)I'll grant you my experience is inherently subjective--though if polling in Iraq existed, I bet you'd find this tracks with reality--but Iraqis overwhelmingly view Obama and the US as one of the main sources of the ISIS problem. Many believe the US government is actively supporting ISIS, and it's not hard to see why: everything we touch in Iraq goes horribly wrong. The US has messed up Iraq so badly that anything the American government does there now will be perceived unfavorably at best. Obama could walk into the Iraqi parliament with bags full of gold for good will, and it would be viewed as a conspiracy to undermine the nation (the Iraqi nation, I mean). After crippling sanctions, two wars, and non-stop bombing raids throughout the Clinton administration, Iraqis are united on at least one thing: they need a serious break from the US.
Rex
(65,616 posts)said ALL invaders would be treated as hostile.
I guess we don't have to follow any laws...we are America after all, we pave the way.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Ford_Prefect
(7,925 posts)I have no doubt this is only the 1st visible escalation of many yet to obtain so-called military stability of our "ally".
It may sound tired to some of you to mention that they haven't really learned anything since Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia. Sadly it seems they insist on never acknowledging the real lessons of that era.
Gung-Ho indeed.
Gung ho /ˈɡʌŋˈhoʊ/ is an English term used to mean "enthusiastic" or "overzealous".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gung-ho
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Works every time.
polly7
(20,582 posts)TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)rather than this bureaucrat fuckface in a political-gossip blog? I am so over Obama.
Ford_Prefect
(7,925 posts)GeorgeGist
(25,324 posts)when he finds out.
Ford_Prefect
(7,925 posts)TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)I mean, that's what they tell us. We're winning so hard, we now need to launch a ground war, which we've gradually been building up to, without anyone actually ever coming out and saying so.
Cayenne
(480 posts)It always appears that Carter, Kerry, and Obama are never on the same page.
randys1
(16,286 posts)TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)I respect him despite various disappointments. However, I don't respect some of his staff and cabinet at all.
Bigmack
(8,020 posts)I prefer the more descriptive term "our sons and daughters".
Boots are easily replaced and don't have families.
(You Marines: I don't mean those kind of "boots"... they are easily replaced, too, I know... but I mean the footware.)
Ford_Prefect
(7,925 posts)I'm tired of no one noticing who dies when others decide to escalate, to cut the budget, or change the water. I don't have an eye-catching sound-bite headline phrase for it that won't get me banned for being too forthright and descriptive.
I can't tell if its time to cry for the victims, or sharpen the pitchforks for the congressmen.
Fairgo
(1,571 posts)uppityperson
(115,681 posts)pinboy3niner
(53,339 posts)By Sgt. William White
FORT CAMPBELL, Ky. - U.S. Secretary of Defense Ashton B. Carter visited 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault) Soldiers at Fort Campbell. Jan. 13, 2016.
Carter wanted to speak to 101st Airborne Division Soldiers directly prior to their upcoming deployment in support of Operation Inherent Resolve, in which they will work to train, advise and assist the Iraqi army to defeat the ISIL.
"Frankly, I know the 101st has taken Mosul before, and you could do it again," Carter said while speaking to more than 200 Screaming Eagle Soldiers set to deploy in the coming weeks. "We could deploy multiple brigades on the ground and arrive in force, but then it would likely become our fight and our fight alone."
He also reaffirmed that we cannot leave Syria and Iraq to their fates.
"That kind of indirect approach simply cannot succeed in today's connected and volatile world. That would just give ISIL a safe haven for which to spread its destructive influence and it would surrender the strong and global leadership that the United States stands for. So we can't ignore this fight and we also can't win it from the outside in. That's why our strategic approach is to help local, motivated and capable forces in every way that we can without taking their place. That's why your mission is central to our strategy."
Carter explained to the 101st Soldiers that the U.S. presence has adapted and no longer calls for a significant ground combat role, but requires us to work closely with Iraqi forces as they fight ISIL.
"Training advising and assisting, rather than trying to substitute entirely, is the right approach," Carter said. "We are going to enable local, motivated forces and an international coalition with a clear campaign plan, with American leadership and with all of our awesome capabilities from airstrikes, special forces, cyber tools, intelligence, equipment, mobility and logistics, training, advise and assistance from those on the ground, including you."
...
Photo Credit: Sgt. William White
U.S. Secretary of Defense Ashton B. Carter speaks to 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault) Soldiers during a visit to Fort Campbell, Ky., Jan. 13, 2016. Carter visited Fort Campbell Soldiers to talk about the division's upcoming mission and to thank deploying Soldiers for their sacrifices. (U.S. Army photo by Sgt. William White)
http://www.army.mil/article/160958/Secretary_of_defense_provides_insights_into_ISIL_fight__101st_mission/
uppityperson
(115,681 posts)I know, it's the jargon used to indicate military but it pisses me off to dehumanize people.
Aside from that, ARGH
randys1
(16,286 posts)And he has made his own mistakes, no doubt.
There is no good answer, what W did was so bad, so terribly destructive to that region, that we are now faced with terrible options.
I think ANY involvement there in this manner is wrong, but I dont get a vote.
One_Life_To_Give
(6,036 posts)No doubt the US Military will Crush ISIL in any direct confrontation. So their fighters can be expected to melt away into the civilian population. If the same people who dropped their weapons and ran at ISIL's approach are to be left to maintain the Peace. ISIL will retake the country before the last of our people make it home again.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)I'm glad we are committing some troops to help the Iraqis rid their country of these vermin. Iraq's ISIS infestation is the fault of the corrupt Cheney/Bush regime. The least we can do is help them eradicate this scourge.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)upwards of 5000 "advisors" and "trainers". But it's so incremental, no one seems to notice. I guess that's the plan.
Ford_Prefect
(7,925 posts)thereismore
(13,326 posts)Do you support our President in sending troops to Iraq.
JonathanRackham
(1,604 posts)ISIS is bad but we can't win. Another war of attrition brewing I fear.