Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 08:04 PM Jan 2016

Americans Get Offended By Statues Of Naked People, Too

--CLIP

For all the international furor over the statues, a more mundane fact was also being covered up: Statues depicting nudes can and often do cause offense all over the world. The situation in Rome may be unusual, but it's hardly unique. In fact, this wasn't the first time in recent months that Italy has covered up statues: When the crown prince of Abu Dhabi visited Florence in October, a statue of a nude man by U.S. artist Jeff Koons had a windbreaker placed around it to protect its modesty.

Ancient statues depicting naked bodies have also caused problems when they travel abroad. In 2013, Greece's ministry of culture cancelled plans to exhibit two ancient statues in Qatar after it emerged that the Qatari government was planning to cover up the statues. "In a society where there are certain laws and traditions, authorities felt women would be scandalized by seeing such things, even on statues," a culture ministry official explained to the Guardian at the time.

The prudishness about nude statues isn't limited to the Islamic world. Here are just a few other examples: In 2012, a five star hotel in Shanghai covered up two statues of a man and a woman after Internet users criticized them as pornographic. In 2005, the mayor of Canadian city Penticton insisted on covering the genitalia of a newly installed nude statue with a metal plate (even after the plate was taken off, persistent attempts to vandalize the statue's genitalia led to it being moved). In 1995, Hong Kong, then still a British colony, covered up a statue of a life-size nude man after a court declared the artwork obscene, outraging art lovers. "The emphasis is on the face, not the genitals," a frustrated legislator told reporters at the time (the decision was later reversed).


Unsurprisingly, Americans can get offended by statues depicting naked people, too. In 2004, a garden center in Tennessee covered up a number of classical-style nude statues with what the Associated Press described as "two-piece crimson velvet sarongs" after complaints from the public (the center later said that the newly-clad statues were helping sales). In 2002, the U.S. Justice Department was reported to have spent $8,000 on curtains to hide a number of nude statues from photo ops, only to have them removed in 2005. There were calls, ultimately unheeded, to clothe two nude statues outside the entrance of the L.A. Coliseum ahead of the 1996 Olympic games.

The District, home of this publication and the U.S. capitol, has sometimes been singled out as a particularly nude statue-heavy place. In 2008, a Texas man even tried to get the GOP to take action. "You don't have nude art on your front porch," rancher Robert Hurt was quoted as telling the platform committee at the state party convention. "So why is it important to have that in the common places of Washington, D.C.?"

MORE...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/01/27/americans-get-offended-by-statues-of-naked-people-too/

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Americans Get Offended By Statues Of Naked People, Too (Original Post) Purveyor Jan 2016 OP
And not just naked statues. Statues in underwear, too. Nye Bevan Jan 2016 #1
Spirit of Justice has been hidden by both the Bush and Obama administrations Major Nikon Jan 2016 #2
American prudes. No understanding of art. sinkingfeeling Jan 2016 #3
john ashcroft JI7 Jan 2016 #4

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
1. And not just naked statues. Statues in underwear, too.
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 08:07 PM
Jan 2016
A realistic-looking statue of a man sleepwalking in his underwear near the center of Wellesley College has created a stir among the women on campus, especially as more than 100 students at the all-women's college signed a petition asking administrators to remove it.

The statue, called Sleepwalker, is part of an art exhibit featuring sculptor Tony Matelli at the college's Davis Museum. The exhibit, New Gravity, features sculptures that are often reversed, upended or atomized.
However, the statue of the sleepwalker -- which is hard to miss in a high-traffic area by both pedestrians and drivers near the campus center -- has caused outrage among some students in just one day after its Feb. 3 installation. Zoe Magid, a Wellesley College junior majoring in political science, started a petition on Change.org with other students asking college president H. Kim Bottomly to have the statue removed.

"This highly lifelike sculpture has, within just a few hours of its outdoor installation, become a source of apprehension, fear, and triggering thoughts regarding sexual assault for many members of our campus community," says the petition. "While it may appear humorous, or thought-provoking to some, it has already become a source of undue stress for many Wellesley College students, the majority of whom live, study, and work in this space."

...

“I think art’s intention is to confront, but not assault, and people can see this as assaulting,” Wang said. “Wellesley is a place where we’re supposed to feel safe. I think place and a context matters, and I don’t think this is the place to put it.”

http://www.boston.com/yourcampus/news/wellesley/2014/02/realistic_statue_of_man_in_his_underwear_at_wellesley_college_sparks_controversy.html
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Americans Get Offended By...