Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

malaise

(269,056 posts)
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 09:19 AM Feb 2016

Sandra Day O'Connor: Obama should name Scalia's replacement

http://edition.cnn.com/2016/02/17/politics/sandra-day-oconnor-obama-scalia-replacement/
<snip>
Retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor says President Barack Obama should name Antonin Scalia's replacement.

O'Connor, a nominee of President Ronald Reagan who became the court's swing vote until she retired from the bench in 2006, broke with Republicans who say they plan to block Obama's nominee, and want his successor to name the next justice.

"I don't agree (with Republicans)," O'Connor said in an interview with Phoenix-based Fox affiliate KSAZ. "We need somebody in there to do the job and just get on with it."

She noted that it's unusual to for a Supreme Court opening to exist in an election year, saying that the proximity to the presidential race "creates too much talk around the thing that isn't necessary."
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sandra Day O'Connor: Obama should name Scalia's replacement (Original Post) malaise Feb 2016 OP
If I never hear from that ex-justice again, it will be too soon JimDandy Feb 2016 #1
True re Bush v Gore but at least she got this one right n/t malaise Feb 2016 #2
"I don't agree (with Republicans)" . . . said Mrs. 5-4. HughBeaumont Feb 2016 #3
Didn't she do that Proud Liberal Dem Feb 2016 #5
Yes, which makes it even more despicable. HughBeaumont Feb 2016 #6
Duty, job, requirement... Wounded Bear Feb 2016 #7
K&R for exposure MagickMuffin Feb 2016 #4

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
1. If I never hear from that ex-justice again, it will be too soon
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 09:45 AM
Feb 2016

for me. She is persona non grata after Bush v Gore.

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
3. "I don't agree (with Republicans)" . . . said Mrs. 5-4.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 10:11 AM
Feb 2016

The "swing vote" that installed the Shithead Scion gets no love.

Here's a Brillo pad, Sandy. Clean the blood off yer hands.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,414 posts)
5. Didn't she do that
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 12:11 PM
Feb 2016

because she reportedly wanted to retire under a Republican President?


How magnanimous of her to be supportive of President Obama doing what he is supposed to be his right and privilege as POTUS- and something, I might add, has NEVER been called into question before.

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
6. Yes, which makes it even more despicable.
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 02:08 PM
Feb 2016

It's not like she didn't know about his benefitting from serial wingnut welfare thanks to Poppy and his various cronies (to that note, the Failure Fuhrer dished out some of that welfare during his presidency).

She knew better and did the wrong thing. She knew Bewsh was a partying, sociopathic, do-nothing dry drunk incompetent with a horrible political record and even worse business resume. Mrs. 5-4 did the wrong thing for purely selfish and partisan reasons. But hey, she can sleep at night, unlike thousands upon thousands of families worldwide whose loved ones were killed thanks to his "decidin'".

To top that off, her replacement was a dozen times worse (Sam Alito, who we're stuck with for decades).

Wounded Bear

(58,670 posts)
7. Duty, job, requirement...
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 02:17 PM
Feb 2016

not "right and privilege" damn it. Duty. It's his job and he will do it.

Sorry, but calling it a "right and privilege" is RWer-speak to weasel out of it.

MagickMuffin

(15,943 posts)
4. K&R for exposure
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 12:02 PM
Feb 2016

Even though she played a critical part in the Bush V Gore debacle, at least she is correct in this fight!

I don't believe the Great Obstructionist Party will give 2 ratsass about it though.

Thx for the thread, malaise

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sandra Day O'Connor: Obam...