Can we PLEASE quit referring to Mitch as a "strict Constitutionalist" ??

[KentuckyWoman]

That jackass would not know the Constitution if it bit him on the ass.

Mitch has always been and will always be nothing but an opportunist. He's for sale to the highest bidder. That's all he is. He gives no fucks for you, me, the US of A generally or gawd ferbid the US Constitution. Hell, wiggle a Holy Bible under his nose and he would still give no fucks unless it was stuffed with $100 bills.

The man does not give a single solitary fuck about whether or not Scalia's seat is filled or not, or when. Political posturing brings in a money flow. That is all.

Sorry for the rant but it's driving me batty.

[onecaliberal]

1. Agreed. The republicans have no fucks to give when it comes to the constitution.

They wipe their collective ass on it daily.

[eppur_se_muova]

2. He's a facultative Constitutionalist, like Scalia was a facultative Originalist.

fac·ul·ta·tive
ˈfakəlˌtādiv/
adjective
adjective: facultative

Biology
capable of but not restricted to a particular function or mode of life.
"a facultative parasite"

[book_worm]

3. He's a strict constitutionalist when it doesn't affect the GOP

[randys1]

4. Mitch doesnt care about the constitution, the law, the American people, not at all.

Now there are dems who dont also, who are in it for themselves only

B U T

the difference is a Dem, by definition, supports average people at least more so than the other side.