Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

madguy

(51 posts)
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:09 PM Feb 2016

It's so DAMN easy...why can't we just do this!

With treasonous Republicans threatening the state of our nation by ignoring their constitutional duty and refusing to hold hearings for any Obama nominee to the Supreme Court:

President O should make a recess appointment (but he might have to hurry as the repukes will probably play games to pretend they are never on recess again for the rest of the year); that appointment will last until the the end of 2017 (Congressional elections mark the cycle) and should be of someone extremely well qualified and highly progressive.

Then, suit should be brought on all the important issues that the right-wingnuts on the Court have rammed down the throats of our people and including the redistricting process. Keep on pressing until they reach the Supreme Court.

The idea is that we have time to overturn some of the worst bullshit, and MAYBE even get a ruling for drawing perfectly acceptable, rational districts which will make it much easier for the Dems to retake the House. Then we can close down, once and for all, the voter suppression and all other fascistic moves these assholes have cursed us with!

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It's so DAMN easy...why can't we just do this! (Original Post) madguy Feb 2016 OP
With today's Wellstone ruled Feb 2016 #1
The Supreme Court ruled against Obama (9-0) in a recess appointment case... PoliticAverse Feb 2016 #2
I think I tend to agree with you. Up to now, I was of the COLGATE4 Feb 2016 #3
The Senate is not in recess. former9thward Feb 2016 #4

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
2. The Supreme Court ruled against Obama (9-0) in a recess appointment case...
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:19 PM
Feb 2016

previously, and sharply limited the President's recess appointment power. The current recess doesn't appear to meet
the required "recess" appointment-wise.

(See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NLRB_v._Noel_Canning )

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
3. I think I tend to agree with you. Up to now, I was of the
Thu Feb 18, 2016, 04:20 PM
Feb 2016

opinion that Obama would be better off facing it head on and submitting a nomination to the Court. However the more I think about it the more I am concerned that, if Obama goes that (as he has said he will) his nominee will be a lukewarm Democrat just barely palatable to the Rethugs who will turn out to be a very unreliable swing vote in 4-4 cases of major importance pending in the court right now; Right to Choose, Voter Suppression, etc. etc. I don't believe it's in Obama's nature to nominate a strong reliable Democrat to the post, even though we have several exceptionally good candidates. So, given that, I thnk I'd prefer an interim apointee, with the full-timer to be appointed by the next Democratic President.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It's so DAMN easy...why c...