Nicholas Kristof: The Party of ‘No Way!’
The last sentence is the kicker, and in the NYT, no less!
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/25/opinion/the-party-of-no-way.html?smid=tw-share&_r=0
The Party of No Way!
Nicholas Kristof
FEB. 25, 2016
snip//
The larger issue here is obstructionism. When I was growing up, the G.O.P. was the serious, prudent, boring party, while the Democrats included a menagerie of populists, rascals and firebrands. Today its the G.O.P. that embraces the George Wallace demagogues, and its aim is less to govern than to cause gridlock. Thats not true of everyone the House speaker, Paul Ryan, seems to have genuine aspirations to legislate. But to be a Republican lawmaker today is too often to seek to block appointments, obstruct programs and shut down government. Politics becomes less about building things up than about burning them down.
Both parties are open to expanding the earned-income tax credit, to early childhood programs, to better approaches to heroin addiction, to supporting women with obstetric fistula, to reducing violence against women worldwide. Yet practical measures to address these issues stall in Congress. The party of Lincoln is now the party of No, refusing even to invite the presidents budget director to testify on an Obama budget, as is customary. Congress is expected to accomplish next to nothing this year.
Donald Trump and Ted Cruz are the apotheosis of this disregard for governing. Cruzs entire congressional career has involved antagonizing colleagues and ensuring that nothing gets done. And Trump barely bothers with policies, just provocations.
All this is ineffably sad. I expect politicians to exaggerate and bluster. But I also expect them to govern, and that is what many in the Grand Old Party now refuse to do.
In that case, should they really be paid? Just as we have work requirements for some welfare recipients, maybe its time to consider work requirements for senators.