General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsYoko Ono says she didn't break up The Beatles
NEW YORK
Yoko Ono has been a prominent artist for decades but at age 83 she is again answering a familiar questionNo, she says, she didnt break up The Beatles.
The Japanese-born singer, artist and widow of John Lennon defended her record in entertainment magazine Us Weekly in the form of a listicle-style interview, 25 Things You Dont Know About Me.
Number 24 on the list: I had nothing to do with breaking up The Beatles. And I think Paul (McCartney) is a pretty cool dude.
The reasons for the 1970 break-up of historys best-selling band have long been a matter of dispute among fans and historians, with some arguing that Onos constant presence in the studio aggravated tensions among the Fab Four.
Lennon and Ono met in 1966 and eventually became constant romantic and artistic companions, famously sleeping together in bed-ins to protest the Vietnam War.
http://www.japantoday.com/category/entertainment/view/yoko-ono-says-she-didnt-break-up-the-beatles
scscholar
(2,902 posts)Know the truth
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)He dragged her into recording and mixing sessions to express her opinion, which she did. Speaking as a musician who has done a lot of recording, I really don't give a shit what a bandmate's girlfriend thinks and she has no business being there.
But by the time the Beatles broke up I think they were all thoroughly sick of each other, and that was by far the main driving force. They'd been cheek-to-jowl for ten years and that gets old.
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)There was no one person to blame, but I think Paul was probably the major reason (and I think Paul is great!).
If you watch "Let It Be", you can see the friction between Paul and the other band members, OK maybe not Ringo, he was glad to be there. Paul was really upset with George, because George didn't ever want to tour again. Paul loved live gigs. That was something that could never be resolved.
I like Yoko!
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)And the ever-increasing tension between John and Paul at that time had a lot more causes than Yoko. Two equally huge talents/egos can't exist forever in the same band.
msongs
(67,412 posts)TexasProgresive
(12,157 posts)The Fab 4 were having disputes and one other factor may be Apple Records. They sold themselves to the devil by placing all Beatle material in the control of Apple and then losing control. I'm probably wrong but that's the way I remember it.
Around the same time some very talented musician friends of mind formed a band. They signed a contract to be the house band for a popular club. The contract seemed good to their non legal minds but in truth was terrible. There was only one way to break it- dissolve the band and they were so good with each other.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)yuiyoshida
(41,831 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)My mother was from Austria and my father was from the South. Both had very thick accents.
I was trying to find the clip from the Turin Winter Olympics where she opened with a speech to the effect of "If everybody think piss, then we will have piss." Yeah, well, in a stadium where people have been drinking beer for hours, I can see that happening.
I sound awful in other languages too. I was once telling a story to some folks over dinner in Argentina about an advertisement for tickets to a bullfight in Spain, and apparently my pronunciation of "boletos" (tickets) sounded a lot like the Argentine pronunciation of "pelotas" (balls), and in the context of talking about bulls, my story was outstandingly hilarious to them for reasons which were not made clear to me until they were in stitches.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)His parents were Holocaust survivors and "Gary" (his given first name) came out "Geddy" via Mom's accent. It stuck, and his name is now legally Geddy Lee Weinrib.
liberalhistorian
(20,818 posts)for what would have happened soon, anyway (as it seems to happen to most bands after awhile), although I can certainly understand the irritation of the others at her constant opinions. If I were them, I wouldn't have given two fly shits what she thought and would have been irritated as hell at hearing the constant drum of "well, Yoko thinks...." from John, and from her. But, as I said, it was about to happen anyway regardless of her presence.
But what she IS partially responsible for is her horrible treatment of Julian and how she did her best to ruin John's relationship with him, especially after Sean was born. God forbid he have ANY baggage at all before she came into his life. She had no right whatsoever to interfere, and she treated Julian like shit after John died, making sure he got almost nothing and trying to erase him from John's life altogether. Selfish, thoughtless bitch all around. Of course, John was responsible, too, for allowing her to do that and for not standing up against her attempts to interfere in that relationship.
edbermac
(15,940 posts)Everyone knows John and Paul had a tense relationship. And overlooked was George vs Paul in the end. He made that very clear in the Anthology book.
Iggo
(47,558 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)George would have been the mega-star of the group.