Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 01:59 PM Feb 2016

Michele Bachmann Just Said That POOR PEOPLE Should NOT Be Allowed To Vote

Not. The. Onion.

http://bipartisanreport.com/2016/02/25/absurd-michele-bachmann-just-said-that-poor-people-should-not-be-allowed-to-vote-tweet/

This twat has really gone too far this time. What on earth was Michele Bachmann thinking last night when she tweeted that 45% of American citizens should be banned from taking part in the electoral process because they were too poor to pay federal income taxes.

For those who live in the real world, unknown to Bachmann, this way of thinking is not only sad and ignorant, but dangerous as hell. What happens when the rest of the blowhards in her party jump on this segregation bandwagon as a feeble attempt at gaining control of elections? Bachmann posted this to Twitter just 17 hours ago:




To confirm the notion that Bachmann is suffering from mental illness and slight retardation, people on Twitter immediately let her know that her kind of rhetoric was, in no way, okay. Below are just a few of the comments Bachmann received to the post above:




So good luck to that whole being a moron on the internet thing, Michele, but outside of your land of make-believe, there is a whole country of people who work their fingers to the bone just to barely scrape by. Should those people not take advantage of the tax breaks that are offered by the government to people who would be unable to get by without them? You are a hideous creature, Ms. Bachmann, go back to your bridge.
35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Michele Bachmann Just Said That POOR PEOPLE Should NOT Be Allowed To Vote (Original Post) KamaAina Feb 2016 OP
I think you meant "twit" not "twat." HassleCat Feb 2016 #1
Not the language I'd use, but it's a direct quote from the article. n/t backscatter712 Feb 2016 #2
OK, then some *** in place of the word would be good. Thanks. (eom) HassleCat Feb 2016 #4
What would that really accomplish? Wilms Feb 2016 #10
"Twat" is the word used in the linked article. Arkansas Granny Feb 2016 #3
You do realize the OP didn't use that term, the author of the article did, right? nt TeamPooka Feb 2016 #5
Why is she still in the news? Blue_Roses Feb 2016 #14
She isn't. She's just tweeting for attention. Like Palin. nt TeamPooka Feb 2016 #19
I'm fine with the former. Lizzie Poppet Feb 2016 #12
I think 'twat' is the past tense of tweet. trof Feb 2016 #24
Isn't that most of the Republican voting base? datguy_6 Feb 2016 #6
I dunno, does a double-wide and a pink flamingo count? n/t malthaussen Feb 2016 #8
Not really, no YoungDemCA Feb 2016 #18
This "study" was the topic on local RW radio yesterday underpants Feb 2016 #7
I'm pretty much OK with whatever nasty label they hang on this person. mountain grammy Feb 2016 #9
The GOP is using voter id laws to try to keep poor people from voting Gothmog Feb 2016 #11
Right on, Wellstone ruled Feb 2016 #15
Nothing unusual about that. malthaussen Feb 2016 #13
I've seen the same argument here on DU noamnety Feb 2016 #16
Ugh. Where? KamaAina Feb 2016 #20
I didn't bookmark the specific posts noamnety Feb 2016 #22
Just another clueless elitist that never worked an honest day in her life. Rex Feb 2016 #17
In other words, a typical GOP politician robhalf4369 Feb 2016 #21
If that were the case, old guy Feb 2016 #23
Sarah Palin's stunt double. hifiguy Feb 2016 #25
Incredible. The Donald might wind up approving. n/t Herman4747 Feb 2016 #26
Why are you linking to someone calling Michelle Bachman a "twat?" LuvLoogie Feb 2016 #27
Bipartisan Report isn't exactly known for holding their tongues... backscatter712 Feb 2016 #28
I always thought she was ultimately powerless. People tend to pile on. She's done. LuvLoogie Feb 2016 #33
I've been known to link to the Rude One from time to time as well KamaAina Feb 2016 #29
Rude Pundit! OMG! LuvLoogie Feb 2016 #31
Well... Rider3 Feb 2016 #30
She's not in jail yet? Wounded Bear Feb 2016 #32
This bulb was bright at one time, but...... imanamerican63 Feb 2016 #34
This might not have the desired effect that she is searching for. Glassunion Feb 2016 #35
 

Wilms

(26,795 posts)
10. What would that really accomplish?
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 02:13 PM
Feb 2016


I think their using the term is, at best, unfortunate. But ^(*& just doesn't make sense to me.
 

YoungDemCA

(5,714 posts)
18. Not really, no
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 02:41 PM
Feb 2016

Republican voters tend to skew middle to upper income, white-collar, and are often self-employed. Those who are more blue-collar tend to be either self-employed or in some sort of management or supervisory position (e.g. owners and managers of construction companies, foremen, etc.). Lots of fairly affluent retirees vote Republican, as well. And among working class people without college degrees, it's typically the higher income ones that are the most Republican.

Of course, there are plenty of exceptions to all of this, but these are some general trends that I have seen.



underpants

(182,843 posts)
7. This "study" was the topic on local RW radio yesterday
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 02:04 PM
Feb 2016

No surprise it's the talking point for the right. Repetition repetition repetition

Gothmog

(145,353 posts)
11. The GOP is using voter id laws to try to keep poor people from voting
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 02:13 PM
Feb 2016

The GOP is pursuing this goal

malthaussen

(17,205 posts)
13. Nothing unusual about that.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 02:16 PM
Feb 2016

Internet outrage aside, that's the way it was for most of history. Just not, you know, the past couple hundred years. Well, we know conservatives don't novelty.

-- Mal

 

noamnety

(20,234 posts)
16. I've seen the same argument here on DU
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 02:35 PM
Feb 2016

that millennials perhaps shouldn't be voting because it's not their tax dollars paying for social programs.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
17. Just another clueless elitist that never worked an honest day in her life.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 02:38 PM
Feb 2016

Fuck Grifter v.2 she and Palin are two of the most worthless people I've ever seen.

old guy

(3,283 posts)
23. If that were the case,
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 03:03 PM
Feb 2016

she would not be able to vote. She is one of the poorest excuses for a human being ever.

backscatter712

(26,355 posts)
28. Bipartisan Report isn't exactly known for holding their tongues...
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 03:19 PM
Feb 2016

I can't say I'm inclined to expend any energy defending Michelle Fucking Bachmann. Bigger fish to fry...

LuvLoogie

(7,014 posts)
31. Rude Pundit! OMG!
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 03:25 PM
Feb 2016

He's kind of the only one I would give a pass. He is definitely the king, the pro. I'd have to grant him artistic license. But it's kind of a sole position don't you think? Like President, only ruder....

Rider3

(919 posts)
30. Well...
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 03:22 PM
Feb 2016

Many of the top companies and the filthy rich don't pay any taxes. So, is Bachmann also saying that THEY shouldn't be able to vote? Or, just those people who are not wealthy?

imanamerican63

(13,802 posts)
34. This bulb was bright at one time, but......
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 04:08 PM
Feb 2016

when the doctor dropped her on her when she was born, it cracked and never was replaced!

Glassunion

(10,201 posts)
35. This might not have the desired effect that she is searching for.
Fri Feb 26, 2016, 04:32 PM
Feb 2016

A lot of wealthy people and corporations don't pay taxes. Just sayin'

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Michele Bachmann Just Sai...