General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow do we get people to turn out in November?
Serious question, cause based on Primary numbers the Repubs seem far more energized than our side does, and that's a real problem. I don't think the DNC has been doing a great job- but in practical terms how do we get people to the polls? We can't afford a Trump presidency.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)TDale313
(7,820 posts)Hopefully Trump does self destruct at some point, but he's firing people up right now.
Maru Kitteh
(28,342 posts)If he is the nominee! I do happen to genuinely love them both.
And in the end I really do believe LOVE always wins over hate. Sometimes it takes a while, but love wins. We will win because the people who really love this country, love all our people and love each other will turn out to vote.
bvf
(6,604 posts)The Republican Party will be just fine with a Clinton in the White House, I'm sure.
EL34x4
(2,003 posts)They're scared shitless right now. It's a white-knuckled panic.
bvf
(6,604 posts)And while everyone's "supporting the troops," we can watch as the middle class continues to fade away.
RichGirl
(4,119 posts)....Gore was just not good enough for so many Democrats. Including Michael Moore and Bill Maher who encouraged their fans to vote Nader. How many American soldiers and innocent Iraqi lives did were lost????
Vote with your brain...not your ego.
GummyBearz
(2,931 posts)If its just another status quo pusher, we will buy wine and stay home watching to see who everyone else wants to push the status quo
TDale313
(7,820 posts)And I'm in a safely blue state so I have the luxury of not voting for the lote. OTOH, Trump is truly frightening to me and I do not want him anywhere near the White House.
cpwm17
(3,829 posts)GummyBearz
(2,931 posts)Still wouldn't vote for someone who I don't believe in though
cpwm17
(3,829 posts)A corrupt neocon and a birther troll are certainly very bad choices.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)There are many good, decent REAL Democrats down ticket who will get my vote. But not That Horrible Woman.
tblue37
(65,483 posts)forget how important the downticket is.
Retrograde
(10,152 posts)So the House seats that will be up for a vote in November aren't important to you? Or any state or local races? That's how the GOP solidified its grasp, and those IMHO are more important in the long run than the presidential race.
GummyBearz
(2,931 posts)And sometimes you have burn everything to the ground in order to rebuild
RussBLib
(9,034 posts)and where has it gotten us? Election after election, vast numbers of voters don't bother already.
Every Democrat has to come out to vote.
If you cannot check the box for Hillary (or Bernie), at least vote on all the other candidates and issues that will also be on the ballot.
You don't have to cast a vote in every race.
Retrograde
(10,152 posts)The people we vote in for state senates and assemblies are the ones who determine the voting regulations: they have enormous power, since they can -and do - influence who gets to vote. In most states, they're the people who do the districting, which is why states like Ohio with Democratic majorities are controlled by Republcans. And the GOP knows that, and manages to mobilize their base to go out and vote, no matter how "small" the election.
I don't care much for either Clinton or Sanders as a candidate, but there is no way I'm going to sit out November. I'll most likely vote for the Democratic candidate for president - and for senator, congressperson, and state assembly. It's just too important not to: I've seen assembly races in my district decided by a couple of hundred votes.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)there might be a 15 dollar initiative on the ballot in Nov. Please do show up for that. The signature gatherers are out there still. I think it has a chance to qualify.
GummyBearz
(2,931 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)It does not go as far, but it matters.
fredamae
(4,458 posts)People feel hopeless against a rigged system. The DNC does not appear to care. But then..ONLY 900 Plus Dem Seats have been lost, so far. DWS isn't finished, apparently.
Regardless the Dem victor yesterday-the Bigger issue is that barely over 12% of Dems turned out in SC and Numbers way Down in IA/NV/NH.....what Is the Dem Leadership doing to counter this trend? November Isn't That far away.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)work on getting people out. We've driven people to the polls some years, but are just saying no to driving mostly elderly conservatives from our area this time. Being a registered Democrat for 60 years does not mean you will vote Democrat. It tends to come out in all that cheerful, fun chat en route. Nice memories, but I'd prefer they stay home in 2016.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)polling places, no need to transport persons here and there. Ease of access, no ID to show, no lines, many days in which to mark that ballot.
This thread is about getting the voters to vote, your post is about suppressing the vote. I oppose your post. Entirely. I have zero need to suppress anyone's vote. I am not a Republican.
Bucky
(54,041 posts)after Trump's nominated and the real mud starts to fly, someone from the Cruz/Santorum/Carson wing of their party may jump into the race. I could see The Donald polling as little as 35% of the popular vote and Clinton getting elected with just 45% of the electorate.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)The crazy would kill any Republicans that supported that challenge in the next primary. And without institutional support, that challenge will not have a big enough effect.
edgineered
(2,101 posts)maybe they are thinking that a Clinton-Romney ticket would pick up that extra 47%.
Brother Buzz
(36,458 posts)Nothing energizes voters like a good juicy wedge issue, something Republicans have known for decades.
KentuckyWoman
(6,692 posts)If you want people to follow you give them a reason. Yapping and GOTV every 4 years doesn't mean dog slobber when people just keep getting worse and worse off despite all the promises from the last election.
TDale313
(7,820 posts)You have to actually give people something to vote for.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Pretty sure that is still a thing.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,363 posts)okaawhatever
(9,462 posts)It is laughable when people compare Clinton to Republicans. (Some of which comes from GOP trolls). Don't kid yourself, the Republicans will be pushing the message that Clinton is part of the "rigged" system, establishment, etc. all in an effort to get Dems to stay home.
Educate yourself on the issues so that you can explain the differences in policy and platforms. If you can't see a mile of difference between the Obama presidency and the Bush presidency you are in denial. The facts are clear and unequivocal. Don't help elect a Republican by passing on their message.
If Sanders gets the nomination their attacks will probably be of the "he's a socialist/communist" variety, but they're keeping their mouths shut for now hoping he wins. They think he's easier to beat in the general. If Bernie wins the nom we'll figure out how to counter attack their message about him.
I am volunteering, donating and voting for whoever the nominee is. I don't agree with the sanctimonious bull about only voting if a candidate "earns my vote" or "inspires me to vote" or "it's all the same". Refusing to vote if my preferred candidate isn't nominated doesn't make me self-righteous or idealistic. It makes me a Republican supporter.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)A devotee of plutocratic Reaganomics and an imperialistic, war-crazy neocon foreign policy.
Case closed.
okaawhatever
(9,462 posts)means prove how Hillary has shown her devotion to plutocratic Reaganomics. War-crazy is a joke and she isn't a neocon. But I'm all ears if you want to issue proof of your claims.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)War Criminal Henry Kissinger. It all speaks for itself.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)We've had 4 states vote so far. In all 4 of them, Democratic turnout has been bad.
You can be as educated and pro-Democrat as you'd like. That doesn't get anyone else to the polls.
donna123
(182 posts)That's what's driving me. Seeing what the GOP is putting up scares me to death.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)That's for damn sure.
Skittles
(153,185 posts)ENOUGH!!!!!!!!!
elana i am
(814 posts)i'm in brownbackistan, and it's all trump all the time in my small world (with a side of sanders - me and my mom). most of my acquaintances are die hard repugs, and not ashamed to say it. clinton is universally loathed. and i imagine if i pressed the issue with them i would find sanders is too.
TBF
(32,086 posts)If people think their vote doesn't matter they are not going to bother.
ripcord
(5,507 posts)TBF
(32,086 posts)and yet he is really a bad idea. I think we're gonna have to raise the bar a little higher than that.
ripcord
(5,507 posts)And Democrat voter registrations went through the roof. People aren't excited about HRC and too few are excited about Bernie and it could cost us. Is the talent pool really that shallow or did the DNC just decide it was Hillary's turn?
TBF
(32,086 posts)Julian Castro was too young. That's my guess.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)And I no longer care which party a candidate represents. I've been voting for Democrat party candidates for 50 years simply because they were Democrats, that will no longer matter. I will vote for the candidate who in my opinion, will do the most for me, regardless of party affiliation. I'm too old to worry about anybody else. They can look out for themselves.
There are 300 million people in this country. If the best we can do as a choice for president is either Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton, we have truly reached the bottom of the barrel.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)A corrupt neoliberal neocon bootlicker of the banks and the MIC or a borderline fascist. Fuck the system in the ear with a red-hot poker.
spanone
(135,862 posts)davidn3600
(6,342 posts)And the primary that had few contenders and debates doesn't help.
The GOP has unlimited airtime. Trump is even dominating MSNBC. They can't stop talking about him since June. Meanwhile, Hillary hides from the media on the tarmac, and the DNC rigs the system in her favor.
And you want us to be excited about her?
shanti
(21,675 posts)is on the ballot here in california. hopefully, that at least will bring voters out!
jeff47
(26,549 posts)OH, CO, FL, VA, and PA on the other hand....
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)For reasons other than gender.
craigmatic
(4,510 posts)push some kind of policy to benefit black people. She has to adopt Sander's ideas about free college to get the young people. We need to soak the rich. She needs to campaign in places not usually gone to by democrats.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Her "trust" numbers are abysmal. So no one will believe her sudden reversal. And there's no way to fix those trust numbers quickly.
kentuck
(111,110 posts)That should get their attention.
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)2008 Illinois Presidential votes cast: 5.4 million
2008 Illinois US Senate votes cast: 5.1 million (we didn't have a senate race in 2012)
difference: -300,000, -5.6%
My guess is, fewer people vote at the congressional level, and so on.
blogslut
(38,010 posts)...there are many Democratic voters who are content with either Clinton or Sanders as their candidate and therefore are not showing up at the polls for the primary.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)And then asking ourselves why that is from a policy perspective.
http://www.statesmanjournal.com/story/news/politics/elections/2014/08/20/democratic-party-supports-marijuana-legalization-gmo-labeling/14359551/
napi21
(45,806 posts)If we enumerate the horrible decisions that were made during Scalia's tenure, and keep repeating "If we don't elect a Democratic President, we'll have to live with horrible decisions like those fore another 30 to 40 YEARS! That takes away the like or dislike of either candidate and gets people to concentrate completely on how they want to shape their future.
I don't know if it will work or not, but I've been thinking about how to do this for YEARS...long before Obama was running, and it's the best I can come up with. I don't feel too guilty though because every politician, advisor, and strong Party activists has agonized over this issue for eons and haven't solved it very well either.
EdwardBernays
(3,343 posts)One of the least trusted people in politics?
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)Depaysement
(1,835 posts)Metric System
(6,048 posts)Bernie. If he can't beat her in the primary, why would he do better than her in the general?
tabasco
(22,974 posts)and a full-blown socio-economic meltdown like the Great Depression.
After the Democrats regain control to clean up the mess, something must be done about right-wing/plutocrat control of the mass media.
basselope
(2,565 posts)The GOP has a LARGE number of people involved and thus much more interest. They are front and center, so people are more interested in weighing in.
Heck, I vote in every drudge poll saying Donald Trump won the debate (even if I didn't watch it). Its a fun circus side show.
The Democratic primary (if you pay attention to the media) is not really contested. There is an inevitable candidate and the one trying to play spoiler. The fact that the spoiler is doing as well as he is, is a miracle, given the lack of attention paid to the contest.
The fact that people are voting in the GOP primary doesn't mean they will vote GOP in November or even vote.. and just because people skip the Democratic primary doesn't mean they will skip in November.
IF we give them a candidate they can get behind (Sanders) they WILL turn out, because the media can't ignore the 1v1 contest the way they are ignoring the dems now.
If Clinton is the nominee, you will see the democratic apathy and likely be saying hello to President trump.. the only good news is that it is followed by President Simpson (at least according to the Simpsons.)
Glitterati
(3,182 posts)Not just Republican threats to vote against.
INSPIRE people. Remember, Barack's "Yes, We can?"