Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MBS

(9,688 posts)
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 06:11 PM Mar 2016

Charles Pierce: time for Debbie Wasserman Schultz to go

http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/news/a42611/debbie-wasserman-schultz-resign/

. . . It is time for her to go. More important, it's time for Hillary Rodham Clinton to insist that she go.

In addition to putting the Congress behind some of the worst predatory bastards in America, this move also gives the lie to anything HRC says about her dedication to reigning in financial crimes. Moreover, this puts the DNC squarely on the other side of the issue from both Bernie Sanders and Senator Professor Warren and, therefore, on the other side of the issue from about 90 percent of some voters she is going to need desperately in the fall.

. . . This is nothing new for DWS, who's been looking out for these creeps for quite some time because they nest in thousands of seedy strip malls up and down Florida. But to have her presiding over a presidential campaign that has as its driving force the financial crimes that tanked the economy, crimes that reach all the way from Goldman Sachs down to Sunrise Gotcher Money Here on Route 4 in Lakeland, is bad politics on all angles.
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Charles Pierce: time for Debbie Wasserman Schultz to go (Original Post) MBS Mar 2016 OP
Yeah, her "leadership" has been disasterous Bradical79 Mar 2016 #1
I totally agree. MBS Mar 2016 #2
Turd Way . seaotter Mar 2016 #3
Schultz is trying to give the whole election to the GOP. nt TeamPooka Mar 2016 #4
There's a good new candidate running for her seat. He needs support. Gregorian Mar 2016 #5
No arguments here! LW1977 Mar 2016 #6

MBS

(9,688 posts)
2. I totally agree.
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 06:19 PM
Mar 2016

This latest bad move on her part is just one of a long list of disastrous moves.

I think it was Charlie Pierce himself who, in an earlier piece about the question of her limiting Democratic primary debates, described DWS as "clumsy and devious." I'd also add "incompetent". She is the worst DNC chair in my memory. Given the stakes of the 2016 election, we need someone who is smart, competent and principled.

PLEASE can we get rid of DWS, NOW?!

Gregorian

(23,867 posts)
5. There's a good new candidate running for her seat. He needs support.
Wed Mar 2, 2016, 06:34 PM
Mar 2016

Unfortunately I also need support. I have googled, and even posted about the guy, and can't find him. Now I'm too busy to research it. But I don't see any other way. It's a bit late to be lamenting what's going on. Shit, we're still running electrons through a republican owned voting machine. Someone, I think it was hifiguy, has a great phrase along the lines of fox-based hen house protection?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Charles Pierce: time for ...