General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsXipe Totec
(43,890 posts)alarimer
(16,245 posts)So, not very good, all things considered.
we can do it
(12,185 posts)DawgHouse
(4,019 posts)mfcorey1
(11,001 posts)website.
Orrex
(63,213 posts):chuckle"
rock
(13,218 posts)fishwax
(29,149 posts)PeteSelman
(1,508 posts)Clicking on the answer sends you to another story.
But I am a certified grammar Nazi. I just like the ego boost a perfect score gives me.
mfcorey1
(11,001 posts)find it.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)One guess, and one disagreement with an answer (number of commas).
mfcorey1
(11,001 posts)unc70
(6,114 posts)Any idea where they think that third comma goes? I am usually heavy with them; love the Oxford comma. Like a good semicolon now and then.
(FYI I know about my title.)
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)dmr
(28,347 posts)Why, if I weren't an old lady ....
Ezra Koenig.
Probably my favorite current band.
dmr
(28,347 posts)I'm glad you posted it.
there was one for a date, a place, and an adverbial phrase.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)... the flagship name could have been separated by commas, too.
Glassunion
(10,201 posts)It's uncivilized otherwise.
fishwax
(29,149 posts)On edit: after scrolling down, I see that you already answered it
metroins
(2,550 posts)Disagreed with commas and made a few mistakes early on.
Bettie
(16,109 posts)He was playing with my mouse cord.
But, I did catch myself second-guessing, because grammar is one of those things where if I think about it, I'm wrong, but if I do it naturally, it is generally fine.
I disagreed with the comma one.
unblock
(52,241 posts)unc70
(6,114 posts)After thinking about it, I have found the third comma.
Some style books place a comma after the year when a date is mid-sentence. I think that style is becoming less common
951-Riverside
(7,234 posts)u dont need no good grammer when we the people got a gun a pocket constitution and are witts bout us.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)Which of the following is not correct?
I was sitting in the chair.
I sat in the chair.
I was sat in the chair.
I got it right because I understood what they meant. However, "I was sat in the chair" could mean someone sat me in the chair, like in timeout.
valerief
(53,235 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)I remember being sat in a chair in my ignorant youth.
valerief
(53,235 posts)seated" sounds correct to me.
RKP5637
(67,109 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Liberal Veteran
(22,239 posts)Orsino
(37,428 posts)I have the bestest words.
SalviaBlue
(2,917 posts)That phrase was marked as proper.
Thems gramer are bad.
fishwax
(29,149 posts)There are a few different ways of distinguishing may and might. One of the key distinctions is that may is a more distinct possibility, while might is a more remote possibility. I may buy a lottery ticket on the off chance that I might win the lottery. This doesn't seem to directly apply to the example. Another distinction has to do with tense--in some usages, might indicates past tense, which also doesn't seem to apply.
In some contexts, the usage may depend on whether the condition is hypothetical, and that's what I think we have here.
If you say "The watch may be very expensive, but it's much better than the others" (which is what the quiz suggests is the right answer), then you likely mean "the watch is very expensive, but it's also much better than the others." So you know the watch is expensive.
But it is also possible to use might in this sentence, in which you are saying "I don't know whether the watch is very expensive, but I do know that it's much better than the others. So I think either answer is okay.
As to "neither" as a pronoun: a singular verb is more formal, but a plural isn't necessarily incorrect, and there are cases in which notional agreement (that is to say, agreement with what the noun actually means) suggest the plural may make more sense (or that there might be subtle distinctions of meaning between the two).
16/17
libodem
(19,288 posts)88%...Stupid adverbs.