Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How good is your grammar? (Original Post) mfcorey1 Mar 2016 OP
I graduated from the Derek Zoolander Center For Kids Who Can't Read Good nt Xipe Totec Mar 2016 #1
My grammers are both dead alarimer Mar 2016 #2
LOL. GoneFishin Mar 2016 #10
mine, too... we can do it Mar 2016 #33
I think you mean how "well" is your grammar... DawgHouse Mar 2016 #3
I would have written, How correct is your grammar? I just copied the post topic from the mfcorey1 Mar 2016 #5
:thumbsup: Orrex Mar 2016 #16
Only if it were sick rock Mar 2016 #20
man, that's what I was going to post fishwax Mar 2016 #32
It doesn't work. PeteSelman Mar 2016 #4
Try msn.com and scroll through the pictured headlines until you mfcorey1 Mar 2016 #6
17/17 Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #7
I also disagreed with that one. mfcorey1 Mar 2016 #8
Me 2, not 3 commas unc70 Mar 2016 #12
The oxford comma. Ah, yes... one of my favorite songs. Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #14
Oh, he's cute. dmr Mar 2016 #21
Oh, yeah. Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #22
I'm going to check the band out. I enjoyed that video. dmr Mar 2016 #25
iirc, unblock Mar 2016 #15
indeed, but... Buzz Clik Mar 2016 #23
I always use the Oxford comma. Glassunion Mar 2016 #24
commas before the year, after the year, and between toronto and canada fishwax Mar 2016 #34
13/17 metroins Mar 2016 #9
16/17 with feline assistance Bettie Mar 2016 #11
i had more luck getting through this with chrome. internet explorer couldn't handle it, lol unblock Mar 2016 #13
Third comma after year in date unc70 Mar 2016 #17
Typical liberal snobs always thinking there better then every body else 951-Riverside Mar 2016 #18
All three sentences in Number 6 could be correct. morningfog Mar 2016 #19
But that would be "I was seated in the chair." nt valerief Mar 2016 #27
In that case, I'm glad I didn't miss it! morningfog Mar 2016 #28
Maybe it's a regional difference. I was seated. I don't know what's correct. I just know "I was valerief Mar 2016 #29
Not bad! (OK for DU, lol!) n/t RKP5637 Mar 2016 #26
Me and my wife both did real good on it (nt) Nye Bevan Mar 2016 #30
I done gooder then y'all I bets. -nt Liberal Veteran Mar 2016 #31
The goodest. Orsino Mar 2016 #35
I was sat in the chair?!? SalviaBlue Mar 2016 #36
I disagree with the may/might answer (and to a lesser degree, with the neither answer) fishwax Mar 2016 #37
Agree malaise Mar 2016 #39
15/17 libodem Mar 2016 #38

PeteSelman

(1,508 posts)
4. It doesn't work.
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 11:09 AM
Mar 2016

Clicking on the answer sends you to another story.

But I am a certified grammar Nazi. I just like the ego boost a perfect score gives me.

unc70

(6,114 posts)
12. Me 2, not 3 commas
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 11:22 AM
Mar 2016

Any idea where they think that third comma goes? I am usually heavy with them; love the Oxford comma. Like a good semicolon now and then.

(FYI I know about my title.)

fishwax

(29,149 posts)
34. commas before the year, after the year, and between toronto and canada
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 02:41 PM
Mar 2016

On edit: after scrolling down, I see that you already answered it

Bettie

(16,109 posts)
11. 16/17 with feline assistance
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 11:20 AM
Mar 2016

He was playing with my mouse cord.

But, I did catch myself second-guessing, because grammar is one of those things where if I think about it, I'm wrong, but if I do it naturally, it is generally fine.

I disagreed with the comma one.

unc70

(6,114 posts)
17. Third comma after year in date
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 11:54 AM
Mar 2016

After thinking about it, I have found the third comma.

Some style books place a comma after the year when a date is mid-sentence. I think that style is becoming less common

 

951-Riverside

(7,234 posts)
18. Typical liberal snobs always thinking there better then every body else
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 12:22 PM
Mar 2016

u dont need no good grammer when we the people got a gun a pocket constitution and are witts bout us.





 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
19. All three sentences in Number 6 could be correct.
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 12:34 PM
Mar 2016

Which of the following is not correct?

I was sitting in the chair.
I sat in the chair.
I was sat in the chair.

I got it right because I understood what they meant. However, "I was sat in the chair" could mean someone sat me in the chair, like in timeout.

valerief

(53,235 posts)
29. Maybe it's a regional difference. I was seated. I don't know what's correct. I just know "I was
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 01:54 PM
Mar 2016

seated" sounds correct to me.

fishwax

(29,149 posts)
37. I disagree with the may/might answer (and to a lesser degree, with the neither answer)
Fri Mar 4, 2016, 03:25 PM
Mar 2016
The watch ____ be very expensive, but it's much better than the others.

There are a few different ways of distinguishing may and might. One of the key distinctions is that may is a more distinct possibility, while might is a more remote possibility. I may buy a lottery ticket on the off chance that I might win the lottery. This doesn't seem to directly apply to the example. Another distinction has to do with tense--in some usages, might indicates past tense, which also doesn't seem to apply.

In some contexts, the usage may depend on whether the condition is hypothetical, and that's what I think we have here.

If you say "The watch may be very expensive, but it's much better than the others" (which is what the quiz suggests is the right answer), then you likely mean "the watch is very expensive, but it's also much better than the others." So you know the watch is expensive.

But it is also possible to use might in this sentence, in which you are saying "I don't know whether the watch is very expensive, but I do know that it's much better than the others. So I think either answer is okay.

As to "neither" as a pronoun: a singular verb is more formal, but a plural isn't necessarily incorrect, and there are cases in which notional agreement (that is to say, agreement with what the noun actually means) suggest the plural may make more sense (or that there might be subtle distinctions of meaning between the two).
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How good is your grammar?