A business case for a wealth tax
The most interesting examination of economics over the last three decades has been Thomas Pikettys Capital in the 21st Century. But hardly anyone has taken Pikettys policy proposals seriously, mainly because Piketty himself framed them as overtly redistributional and described them as utopian.
In America today, arguing in favor of redistributional taxes on wealth may be factually, logically, and even morally supportable but such arguments are counter-productive. Confiscatory tax policies pose a lethal threat to the rich and powerful, demanding their aggressive resistance.
Redistributional policies also hold little appeal to the American voting public. Who among us really wants to go to war against a class we all aspire to join? Even progressives, who often embrace and utilize redistributional rhetoric as part of the inequality debate, have largely dismissed Pikettys proposed wealth tax.
But Piketty nearly got it right. A properly structured annual wealth tax could equalize effective tax rates between labor and capital, while simultaneously stimulating more productive capital allocations and, in the process, job creation.
MORE HERE: http://yonside.com/a-business-case-for-a-wealth-tax/