Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

UCmeNdc

(9,600 posts)
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 05:18 PM Mar 2016

Donald Trump is incredibly dangerous.

Top liberals and leading progressive groups perceive the GOP front-runner as a dangerous and unprecedented threat.

Leading liberals and progressive groups are turning their gaze away from the Democratic primary and toward efforts to unite the left against Donald Trump, framing him as a dangerous and unprecedented candidate who poses an existential threat to the progressive movement and the nation.

Ad campaigns are in the works. There are calls for massive voter mobilizations and screeds from leading donors circulating within liberal circles. Major labor groups are organizing their members on the ground in swing states. Within the Democratic Party apparatus, top elected leaders are beginning to speak out both collectively and individually in ways that reach beyond standard presidential-year posturing. The sense of urgency in some corners of the left is high enough that Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a progressive icon who has gone to great lengths to avoid being part of the Democratic presidential conversation in 2016, hinted on Monday that she might soon get involved with the effort to stop Trump.


Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/democrats-donald-trump-alarm-220910#ixzz43CIZNRKJ
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook






Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/democrats-donald-trump-alarm-220910#ixzz43CIHojQC
Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Gregorian

(23,867 posts)
2. He's a billion dollar threat.
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 05:23 PM
Mar 2016

Is it just me, or does his money power frighten anyone else? I mean, he can do things other people can't. He could conceivably finance some illegal arm of the Pentagon out of his own pocket.

I don't know, and I don't want to find out. Which brings to mind, Dems must run our strongest candidate. I think you know where this is going. It's about Trump.

world wide wally

(21,749 posts)
4. It's too bad we don't own the media
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 05:30 PM
Mar 2016

The worst thing you could do to Trump is ignore him.
But since we have no control over the media, I think the way to get under his skin at a debate would be to not react to him and just pretend he isn't there.
I am pretty sure he would turn a bright red just before he exploded.

pampango

(24,692 posts)
5. "Signed by leaders of more than 20 leading liberal groups that support Clinton or Bernie Sanders,
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 05:33 PM
Mar 2016

the letter described Trump in the harshest of terms and called for a massive organizing effort against him.

The letter, released Tuesday, served as a public acknowledgment of the heightened apprehension surrounding Trump’s candidacy, as well as a sign that leaders in the party’s left wing are now setting their sights more squarely on Trump than the protracted Democratic nomination battle between Clinton and Sanders.

“As more and more progressive groups were with each other in the early primary states and talking about our general organizing, we decided to link our fights and invite others to join us,” explained Henry.

The question of what to do about Trump has gone from a bad joke to a topic of frequent conversation among leading Democrats including members of Congress. As Trump has stormed toward the GOP nomination, confounding the Republican establishment and steamrolling veteran officeholders in his path, liberal leaders have come to conclude that the time has come to more seriously confront Trump — whom, they warn, could actually win the White House."

LongTomH

(8,636 posts)
8. Imagine if Hitler had nukes!
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 05:57 PM
Mar 2016

With all the comparisons of Trump and Hitler, we miss the fact that Hitler didn't have nukes, even the rather primitive nuclear weapons of the 1940s. The United States currently has 4,760 nuclear or thermonuclear weapons, almost all of them many times greater in yield than the ones used on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Needless to say, using a fraction of these weapons, perhaps 1%, would probably produce a nuclear winter, along with millions of people killed directly by blast and radiation.

The President, in his capacity as Commander-in-Chief, has the go-codes[/blockquote to unleash these weapons on real (or in Trump's case: imaginary) adversaries.

felix_numinous

(5,198 posts)
9. Bill Clinton encouraged Trump to run for president
Thu Mar 17, 2016, 06:03 PM
Mar 2016

I wonder what sort of deal was made, if any? I'm sure we'll find that out shortly.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Donald Trump is incredibl...