Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

WhiteTara

(29,721 posts)
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 03:59 PM Mar 2016

NC Man Arrested for Not Returning Rental VHS Tape 14 Years Ago

http://abcnews.go.com/US/nc-man-arrested-returning-rental-vhs-tape-14/story?id=37897366

A North Carolina man says he was arrested for not returning a video cassette tape he rented 14 years ago.

James Meyers Jr., a single dad from Concord, said he was driving his 10-year-old daughter to school at around 7:30 a.m. Tuesday when police pulled him over for a broken brake light. Meyers gave the police officers his driver’s license and was shocked when they said there was a warrant out for his arrest for not returning a VHS rental, "Freddy Got Fingered," from 2002, he said.

"They were chitchatting with me and talking about how ridiculous this is," Meyers told ABC News today. "Then they arrested me.

"Because I had my daughter in the car and we were on the way to school they said that I could take my daughter to school and go to work and then find a babysitter, and then come into the police and turn myself in."
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NC Man Arrested for Not Returning Rental VHS Tape 14 Years Ago (Original Post) WhiteTara Mar 2016 OP
There must be a statute of limitation on petty crimes like this. Vinca Mar 2016 #1
They have to use up their jail cells, perhaps, or all that money paid to the private firm is wasted? Baobab Mar 2016 #5
As petty as it is, The crime is immaterial, there is no statute of limitation on an active warrant. Heeeeers Johnny Mar 2016 #10
So they can still find him guilty? Nt Logical Mar 2016 #15
IANAL - If they want to be real dicks about it? Heeeeers Johnny Mar 2016 #22
I first read about this on FB this morning liberalhistorian Mar 2016 #2
I'd punish him too for watching that junk. Hoyt Mar 2016 #3
I was going to say - maybe he was just embarrassed to take it back underpants Mar 2016 #6
Good defense. Hoyt Mar 2016 #7
That one wasn't too bad, the followup "Freddie Got Fingered 2" was the really crappy one snooper2 Mar 2016 #9
That's the finger that keeps on giving. Hassin Bin Sober Mar 2016 #14
Given that the video store has been out of business for DURHAM D Mar 2016 #4
I'm pretty sure Roger Ebert said that was the worst movie he ever saw. Nye Bevan Mar 2016 #8
I started to read the review. You should put a trigger alert on that. NT mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2016 #17
At least all of the authorities involved realize the idiocy flying rabbit Mar 2016 #11
The officers did play it well 1939 Mar 2016 #18
And for being in one particular demographic rather than another. LanternWaste Mar 2016 #20
the warrant should have been civil Mosby Mar 2016 #12
Must have had the same reaction to that film I did ProudToBeBlueInRhody Mar 2016 #13
I was at a Goodwill (actually two of them) on Tuesday. Videotapes are now four for a dollar. mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2016 #16
I don't understand... skypilot Mar 2016 #19
Renting Freddie Got Fingered should be a crime in and of itself. Initech Mar 2016 #21

Vinca

(50,300 posts)
1. There must be a statute of limitation on petty crimes like this.
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 04:02 PM
Mar 2016

Of course, it is North Carolina . . .

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
5. They have to use up their jail cells, perhaps, or all that money paid to the private firm is wasted?
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 04:16 PM
Mar 2016

just hypothesizing, i don't know anything about the situation and too disgusted to look it up.

nt

Heeeeers Johnny

(423 posts)
22. IANAL - If they want to be real dicks about it?
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 01:19 PM
Mar 2016

Possibly, I'm not certain how the system plays out in a situation like this where the person(s) whom filed
the original complaint are long gone and are unavailable (or unwilling), to testify or drop the charges.

Not mentioned in the article is if there's a failure to appear in court charge stemming from the original charge.

As messed up as the legal system is, I would expect the charges to be dropped and the case dismissed,
but... I also have zero faith in the courts doing the right and/or sensible thing.

liberalhistorian

(20,819 posts)
2. I first read about this on FB this morning
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 04:04 PM
Mar 2016

and it's the stupidest most inane fucking thing I've heard in a long time. And given what we've been dealing with lately nationally, that's saying a lot.

Did the now-defunct store ever hear of civil collections actions to recoup property or of, perhaps, letting shit go after a certain amount of time? This should be immediately dismissed.

How many of us have forgotten about library books or rented tapes? Almost every single person I know. I guess everything is criminalized now. Fucking ridiculous.

DURHAM D

(32,611 posts)
4. Given that the video store has been out of business for
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 04:15 PM
Mar 2016

a decade won't this just be dismissed?

Waste of tax payer dollars.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
8. I'm pretty sure Roger Ebert said that was the worst movie he ever saw.
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 04:44 PM
Mar 2016

Yep:

This movie doesn't scrape the bottom of the barrel. This movie isn't the bottom of the barrel. This movie isn't below the bottom of the barrel. This movie doesn't deserve to be mentioned in the same sentence with barrels.

http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/freddy-got-fingered-2001

flying rabbit

(4,636 posts)
11. At least all of the authorities involved realize the idiocy
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 09:44 PM
Mar 2016

and seem to be hassling him as little as possible(within the limits of what they are required to do). The arrest is probably going to get thrown out of court.

1939

(1,683 posts)
18. The officers did play it well
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 09:35 AM
Mar 2016

If they wanted to be assholes, they could have had him up against the hood getting cuffed with his daughter turned over to child protective services and the car towed.

One of the bennies he got for not getting hostile with them when they pulled him over.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
20. And for being in one particular demographic rather than another.
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 09:51 AM
Mar 2016

"One of the bennies he got for not getting hostile..."

And for being in one particular demographic rather than another.

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
13. Must have had the same reaction to that film I did
Thu Mar 24, 2016, 10:31 PM
Mar 2016

Stopped on it one night on HBO. Began to feel numb, then slipped into a coma.

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,567 posts)
16. I was at a Goodwill (actually two of them) on Tuesday. Videotapes are now four for a dollar.
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 09:29 AM
Mar 2016

They're down to the Tom Hanks rom-coms. I doubt that they had anything this bad.

I'm not going back to look.

skypilot

(8,854 posts)
19. I don't understand...
Fri Mar 25, 2016, 09:40 AM
Mar 2016

...how it could even get to the point of an arrest. How do/did video stores operate in NC? Every video store I've ever dealt with required you to leave a credit card number on file. If you didn't have a credit card you'd leave a deposit. If you didn't return the video after a certain amount of time your credit card was debited for the cost of the video or the amount was taken from your deposit. What the fuck is going on in NC?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NC Man Arrested for Not R...