General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBill Moyers: Hillary should tell Debbie Wasserman Schultz and Rahm Emanuel to step down
Time for These Two Democrats to Go
Bill Moyers
Managing Editor, Moyers & Company
They represent everything wrong with the Democratic Party. Hillary Clinton should tell them to take a hike.
There are two Democrats whose resignation from office right now would do their party and country a service.
Their disappearance might also help Hillary Clinton convince skeptical Democrats that her nomination, if it happens, is about the future, and not about resurrecting and ratifying the worst aspects of the first Clinton reign when she and her husband rarely met a donor to whom they wouldnt try to auction a sleepover in the Lincoln Bedroom.
In fact, while were at it, and if Secretary Clinton really wants us to believe shes no creature of the corporate and Wall Street money machine despite more than $44 million in contributions from the financial industry since 2000 and her $675,000 in speaking fees from Goldman Sachs, not to mention several million more paid by other business interests for an hour or two of her time she should pick up the gauntlet herself and publicly call for the departure of these two, although they are among her nearest and dearest. And we dont mean Bill and Chelsea.
No, she should come right out and ask for the resignations of Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel and Democratic National Committee Chair and Florida congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz. In one masterstroke, she could separate herself from two of the most prominent of all corporate Democratic elitists.
More: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bill-moyers/rahm-emanuel-debbie-wasserman-schultz_b_9527768.html
democrank
(11,112 posts)One of the most principled voices in our country.
djean111
(14,255 posts)to the Rahm and DWS brand of being a "Democrat". All three, again IMO, either DINOs, or else, really, the Democratic Party has firmly moved to the Third Way, corporate, Neo-con right, and left the "Democratic Wing", the progressives and liberals, behind.
Removing them would, of course, be good - but for me, they have forever tainted the Democratic brand. This is why a lot of people will not just "vote for the D".
cui bono
(19,926 posts)And they would be right.
Anyone who wants integrity back in the party has only one choice in this primary. Bernie Sanders.
.
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)He has integrity for sure...a bird told me so!
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)If Hillary is pro-corporate than so is the Party.
Goes back to the idea that the Clintons OWN the Party.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,369 posts)... and give her a better job in the cabinet.
Rahm? Rahm Who?
elljay
(1,178 posts)Perhaps to The Maldives.
zentrum
(9,865 posts).there's no daylight between the 2 of them and the Clintons. They define The Establishment of the Party.
Omaha Steve
(99,737 posts)Donate to Democratic Underground for Tim Canova FL-23 here: https://secure.actblue.com/contribute/page/du4timcanova
Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)Neo-liberal policies!
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts).... among other things.
But worry not!
She'll apologize for not doing it later.
Thespian2
(2,741 posts)Bill Moyers is once again correct...but we should not hold our breaths until she tells them to resign...
DWS's entire future depends on HRH winning...
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)How did we let these jerks take over?
tabasco
(22,974 posts)Money = power and it just seems to corrupt everybody and everything.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)Allowing corporate scammers to infiltrate the once great Democratic Party is pathetic.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)If the Democratic party wants to continue to exist without a fundamental meltdown and split, major changes need to be made NOW!
PATRICK
(12,228 posts)that people who people in place for those very purposes never heed in the slightest. Oh, she might resign as a career move to prepare for the Hillary WH and appear as a token "sacrifice" to the gutted foe, but one wonders why journalists bother with advising leopards to remove their spots.
I don't think he is naive though. This is more a satirical expression of converting a unrepentant sinner.