General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBeware the Blue State Model: How the Democrats Created a "Liberalism of the Rich"
Lets go to Boston, the spiritual homeland of the professional class and a place where the ideology of modern liberalism has been permitted to flourish without challenge or restraint.
Thomas Frank
?itok=EzkdODha
When you press Democrats on their uninspiring deeds -- their lousy free trade deals, for example, or their flaccid response to Wall Street misbehavior -- when you press them on any of these things, they automatically reply that this is the best anyone could have done. After all, they had to deal with those awful Republicans, and those awful Republicans wouldnt let the really good stuff get through. They filibustered in the Senate. They gerrymandered the congressional districts. And besides, change takes a long time. Surely you dont think the tepid-to-lukewarm things Bill Clinton and Barack Obama have done in Washington really represent the fiery Democratic soul.
So lets go to a place that does. Lets choose a locale where Democratic rule is virtually unopposed, a place where Republican obstruction and sabotage cant taint the experiment.
Lets go to Boston, Massachusetts, the spiritual homeland of the professional class and a place where the ideology of modern liberalism has been permitted to grow and flourish without challenge or restraint. As the seat of American higher learning, it seems unsurprising that Boston should anchor one of the most Democratic of states, a place where elected Republicans (like the new governor) are highly unusual. This is the city that virtually invented the blue-state economic model, in which prosperity arises from higher education and the knowledge-based industries that surround it.
(snip)
This is a curious phenomenon, is it not? A blue state where the Democrats maintain transparent connections to high finance and big pharma; where they have deliberately chosen distant software barons over working-class members of their own society; and where their chief economic proposals have to do with promoting innovation, a grand and promising idea that remains suspiciously vague. Nor can these innovation Democrats claim that their hands were forced by Republicans. They came up with this program all on their own.
ChazInAz
(2,572 posts)Is there some reason you're posting this conservative screed?
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)alarimer
(16,245 posts)as well as the poor. THIS is why so Trump is so popular. It's not racism, it's that liberals (starting with Bill Clinton) have abandoned them and the New Deal, in favor of some Third Way bullshit. This is also why Bernie resonates so much and what pisses me off most about Hillary.
moonbabygo
(281 posts)Ferd Berfel
(3,687 posts)And this is why, if the DLC candidate is the nom, she will loose.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)This what pisses me off the most about the superdelegates. We haven't been just abandoned, but exiled from the political process.
erpowers
(9,350 posts)I disagree with his premise that Boston Democrats were not forced to do the things they did by Republican politicians. Thomas Frank's position might be true if Boston was in a world all by its self. However, that is not the case. Boston Democrats had to deal with Southern Republicans. If Democrats had not worked hand-in-hand with "high finance and big pharma" those industries could have gone South and gotten better deals. In that case there would have been even more job lose and pain for Boston residents.
The real problem is that businesses learned they could pits cities and states against each other. When that happened business were able to ask for tax breaks they did not need, but states were reluctant to deny because it was know the business could move to another city or state. As a result there were Democratic leaders making deal with businesses in order to keep the businesses and the much needed jobs in cities and states. So, even the hands of Boston Democrats were forced.